Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Can Aaron Hicks Be Fixed?


    Parker Hageman

    One of the more critical openings the Minnesota Twins will have this year is in center field. If all goes well, that job will be Aaron Hicks’ to borrow. What are the odds that he meets expectations in 2015?

    Twins Video

    The offseason did not start off well for Hicks: In November he was released from his Venezuelan winter ball team after hitting just .220/.381/.280 in 16 games. The explanation from his team was that he was released because of the poor production but there were rumblings from local media that the Venezuelan team was also upset with his attitude. Whatever the case might be between him and Bravos de Margarita, earlier in the offseason general manager Terry Ryan was emphatic that the Twins organization had no concerns over Hicks’ drive and makeup.

    Meanwhile, during his introductory conference call with season ticket holders manager Paul Molitor reiterated his hopes that Hicks will be able to hold the center field job. That, of course, will depend on how much he can do with the stick. Since coming up to the Twins in 2013, Hicks has posted an OPS+ of 69 (heh) which is 79 out of 89 hitters who have played at least 25 games in center. Ahead of him? Sam Fuld (76), Jordan Schafer (82), Alex Presley (83) and Danny Santana (130). With the exception of Santana those other three players were readily available, making Hicks the epitome of a player below replacement-level.

    It is a shame considering Hicks has the requisite tools necessary to be a solid contributor. All that is, except hitting. If the baseball saying goes " Hit and we’ll find a position for you" is true, the opposite is certainly valid for those who cannot hit.

    There does not seem to be any reason to blame bad luck for the low offensive numbers, either. According to ESPN/TruMedia’s database, since 2013 Hicks’ hard-hit average has been at .115 -- well below the average of .155, and qualifies as 31 of 36 center fielders with 400 plate appearances. Because of this, it is easy to see why he wound up with the second lowest batting average on balls in play in that pool.

    Part of what makes him so volatile at the plate is being a switch-hitter who has not found comfort at either side of the plate -- particularly from the left-hand side where he will find the bulk of his plate appearances. Ted Simmons, the former switch-hitting catcher who eventually became the San Diego Padres bench coach, offered this up to ESPN’s Tim Kurkjian about hitting from both sides: It’s difficult.

    "Six percent of all players is a very small sample,'' Simmons told ESPN regarding having success when hitting from both sides. "And how many of that 6 percent are even capable of hitting .300? Now that 6 percent goes down to maybe 2 percent. So now we're talking about a very, very, very small sample. I also have yet to find a person that completely, totally, unequivocally has bilateral symmetry. One side is always dominant. People can't write right-handed and left-handed with the same physicality.”

    Hicks shares Simmons’ sentiments on switch-hitting as well. Even before his decision to drop the left-handed swing in 2014, he knew the sinister swing was his weaker side.

    “I play golf right-handed. I do everything right-handed,” Hicks told Alan Maimon and Chuck Myron in their book Hits and Misses in the Baseball Draft before the start of the 2012 season. “I think one of the main reasons I’m good at hitting baseball right-handed is because of the eye-hand coordination I developed playing golf. I never felt the same confidence hitting left-handed. And neither did my coaches. In high school, they’d say, ‘Hey, we’ve got the bases loaded. Can Aaron please hit right-handed, so we can win this game?’ [before the 2012 season], I fooled around with playing left-handed golf. I think it helped my left-handed baseball swing come along.”

    Beyond the strains of switch-hitting, what is happening in his swing that is hindering his ability to make quality contact? In 2012 Hicks said to the Star Tribune’s Phil Miller in a Baseball America article that he had been tinkering too much with his swing the previous season.

    “I never got any consistency last year because I was just tweaking my swing too much,” the Hicks said. “I tried my hands high, then tried them low. I tried holding my bat still, then I tried letting my hands move more freely. I was constantly changing it up.”

    Despite trying multiple swings along the way, it appears that the bulk of the modifications were focused on his hands. Judging from recent video, the problem could be a few feet lower.

    Watch his swing up to the point of contact from the left-hand side.

    http://i.imgur.com/JHhf3Jt.gif

    At the end of the clip, keep an eye on his front foot as it begins to turn and roll. For the majority of hitters, the process of turning over their front foot begins after contact, not before (with Jason Heyward being one of those outlying exceptions). While there are almost unlimited examples to compare to, below is a comparison of Hicks to teammate Joe Mauer before contact.

    AH_LHB.jpg

    JM_LHB.jpg

    When this was presented to hitting instruction Bobby Tewksbary, who has worked with Jason Donaldson and Chris Colabello, Tewksbary said he believes this to be the symptom of a larger issue with his swing. This is an indicator that his front side is pulling out. In the video clip above, it is clear that his front side is drifting well below the point of contact.

    The planted front foot ensures a strong leverage point and keeps the hips from opening up too soon. If the front side opens up, the swing as a tendency to lag through the zone and the outer-half of the plate becomes a safe haven for pitchers. This is why pitchers likely targeted Hicks in that location:

    strike-zone (6).png

    Perhaps even more disheartening is that pitchers threw plenty of pitches over the heart of the plate with which Hicks has been unable to produce.

    Hicks’ practice of turning over on his foot before contact happens from the right-side as well. As he stated before, he is a much more natural hitter from the right so he demonstrates better contact and more power. That said, he still drifts:

    AH_RHB.jpg

    AJ_RHB.jpg

    ****

    Twins hitting coach Tom Brunansky has been credited with working wonders on a handful of his players. Hicks, on the other hand, has been a complete mystery. Gifted with the tools to succeed at the highest level, the ability to hit consistently has eluded him. To this point, Brunansky and the rest of the organization’s coaches have not been able to figure out that problem either.

    If the Twins have spotted this and have tried to get him to stop turning off his front side, then it would seem that he has not been unable to replicate the work in the cages into the game. It is also possible that he was working on it in Venezuela, hence the low yield at the plate. If they have not, it could pay dividends to attempt to have Hicks try to work on keeping his front foot firm up to the point of contact. Either way, progress needs to be made.

    As much as Hicks could use a good season at the plate, the Twins could really benefit from having a strong contributor at a key position.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    What Riverbrian stated 100%.

     

    For the Twins to go in to 2015 with nothing more in place in CF than Hicks and Schafer, a pair of failed and failing prospects, with nothing else for contingency for a third straight season is beyond odd or frustrating, but borders on apathy or incompetence. There absolutely has to be a third option added to this mix.

    I've always been partial to Hicks. but he is perplexing and I don't have a clue.  I do agree with Dantes about not sending him to AAA for the main reason of when/if he figures it out he will likely be a 4th OF.  It's time to see if he has it or not.

     

    With his exposure to MLB pitching and with Hunter on board I think it be best to give him the job this spring in CF.  Platoon with Schafer on the tough RHP if you like, but give the bulk of time to Hicks.  By mid-season see what's there.  If he has improved great, if not send him down or packing. 

    People keep typing he is a good MLB defender....that is not what I saw, heard on the radio, or see in the stats.....where do people get this idea?

    I thought he passed the eye test in general but he did have some perplexing bad games where everything seemed to drop around him.  His arm is legit, for sure.  

    People keep typing he is a good MLB defender....that is not what I saw, heard on the radio, or see in the stats.....where do people get this idea?

     

     

    I think he is still has some things to work on but I tend to agree with Ryan's assessment of Hicks' defense in the Offseason Handbook

     

    "[H]is defense and his throwing and his range and his jumps and his angles are pretty good. In fact, a lot of people will tell you it is better than pretty good."

     

    I'm not confident the 480 innings in center this year tells us much in terms of UZR performance. Inside Edge's fielding stats are a little more favorable towards him. I would consider him a "good" defender. The problem is, the Twins need a "great" defender in the outfield to work between Arcia and Hunter.

    People keep typing he is a good MLB defender....that is not what I saw, heard on the radio, or see in the stats.....where do people get this idea?

     

    I'd guess much of it is based on who was around him.  It might be impossible to look bad when you're sandwiched between Willingham and Arcia.  By default you're the best outfielder on the field. 

     

    Also, most of his mistakes seemed to be of the mental variaty.  People probably assume those can be corrected with coaching, experience, focus or repetition.  Same reason most people aren't closing the book on Arcia just yet.

    "[H]is defense and his throwing and his range and his jumps and his angles are pretty good. In fact, a lot of people will tell you it is better than pretty good."

     

     

    I am genuinely confused how anyone comes away with that positive of an assessment.

    Barring a complete ST collapse, this scenario is spot on.

     

    I agree that is what will happen.

     

    If you read the history on Hicks and switch hitting, it is telling.  He hit right until he was about 11.  His Dad, who did not want him to play baseball made him take up switch hitting as a means of testing his desire for the sport. 

     

    I don't know about you guys, but I was always right handed. If someone forced me at 11 to start hitting from the left side I would struggle big time. I don't ever think I would be competent, it is not my natural side.  Let alone ever be a competent professional from that side.

     

    For my two cents, I bet he puts up better than a .548 OPS against righties if he batted from the right side, where he hits lefties to the tune of .750.   But the Twins keep forgetting to ask me. 

    Edited by tobi0040

    I wonder how well Rosario can play center field. I'm thinking it would be overly optimistic to think Buxton gets to the show this year but there is probably an outside chance it could happen. IDK I'm not too excited about Hicks/Schafer in center. I hope I'm wrong though.

    I find this thread very interesting and I also see quite a divergence of opinion about Aaron Hicks.  First of all, as usual, an absolutely wonderful analysis of Hicks by Parker.  I think it is important to note that he isn't Miguel Cabrera from the right side either.  Let's also acknowledge that there are definite advantages to switch hitting and definite advantages to batting left handed.  At 25 years of age, one would have to be a really lousy left handed hitter to give up those advantages.  Also a word about Hicks' tools--he is regarded as a fast runner, but he isn't off-the-charts fast.  He had one good stolen base season, but otherwise hasn't been a huge threat on the bases.  The power hasn't developed either and last year I was truly disappointed with the lack of power he showed, he just didn't hit many balls hard--on a line, fly balls or grounders. 

     

    I agree that a prospect (and I still consider Hicks to be one) should not be platooned, especially as the RH half of a job share. I wholeheartedly agree that for the player and the team, Hicks must be sent to Rochester to start the season.  Let him master a level he hasn't yet mastered, build his confidence, and if he is the best outfield option by sometime in May, bring him up. 

     

    Regarding the lack of a Plan B, perhaps that is Danny Santana.  It could happen either way, if the current candidates can't perform at replacement level or if Santana struggles as a shortstop, then he could return to the outfield where he made real strides and hit very well.  I wouldn't rule out Rosario either.  It is still a long shot for him to make the club out of ST, but in my mind he should be rated on a par with Hicks, since Aaron has not proven very much as a major leaguer.     

    I find this thread very interesting and I also see quite a divergence of opinion about Aaron Hicks.  First of all, as usual, an absolutely wonderful analysis of Hicks by Parker.  I think it is important to note that he isn't Miguel Cabrera from the right side either.  Let's also acknowledge that there are definite advantages to switch hitting and definite advantages to batting left handed.  At 25 years of age, one would have to be a really lousy left handed hitter to give up those advantages.  Also a word about Hicks' tools--he is regarded as a fast runner, but he isn't off-the-charts fast.  He had one good stolen base season, but otherwise hasn't been a huge threat on the bases.  The power hasn't developed either and last year I was truly disappointed with the lack of power he showed, he just didn't hit many balls hard--on a line, fly balls or grounders. 

     

    I agree that a prospect (and I still consider Hicks to be one) should not be platooned, especially as the RH half of a job share. I wholeheartedly agree that for the player and the team, Hicks must be sent to Rochester to start the season.  Let him master a level he hasn't yet mastered, build his confidence, and if he is the best outfield option by sometime in May, bring him up. 

     

    Regarding the lack of a Plan B, perhaps that is Danny Santana.  It could happen either way, if the current candidates can't perform at replacement level or if Santana struggles as a shortstop, then he could return to the outfield where he made real strides and hit very well.  I wouldn't rule out Rosario either.  It is still a long shot for him to make the club out of ST, but in my mind he should be rated on a par with Hicks, since Aaron has not proven very much as a major leaguer.

    Excellent post!

     

    Still talented, filled with a lot of potential, having shown at least some of that potential off previously in the minors, being rushed to the majors and then pulled and pushed about like Stretch Armstrong...and still only 25...there is no reason to give up on Hicks yet. For those who say he has nothing to learn or prove at the AAA level at this point, I'd say he hasn't proved anything at that level yet, and unless we're watching two completely different players in CF for the Minnesota Twins named Aaron Hicks, he hasn't proven he can play at the ML level enough to warrant any consideration there to be sure.

     

    Again, talented and only 25, the smartest thing the Twins could do would be to make a move for a fill-in/stop gap CF...such as a member of the St Louis Cardinals that we have mentioned on several occasions...to a) help the 2015 ballclub :cool: be a nice role player on the bench when Buxton arrives c) remove pressure off Hicks and allow him to play a year in AAA, work on his game, gain/re-gain confidence, and rewind his career a bit in hopes that he can actually have one.

     

    As far as the initial function of the post, breaking down his swing, I'm no Parker, but rolling of the foot or not, his hips and whole lower half seem to bail out before the ball even arrives as though Nolan Ryan were pitching and pi**ed off. How could you ever hope to drive the ball with any authority with that opening movement?

    If he wasn't handed the job last year, what was the other option, exactly?

     

    He didn't HIT that well even in the minors. Who, here, said "give up on him".....and, the Twins did not give up on Gomez, they traded for a starting SS.

    If you thought Gomez was going to be an all-star you don't make that deal.  There weren't a dozen Twins fans in the state who were sad to see him go either.  Most of those same people would love to see the Twins trade Hicks for a starting anything right now.

    Should have added an "honest" next to that assessment.  

    You'll buy respected, but want honest specified too?   :confused:   OK, consider it added.

     

    Anyway, Ryan has been known to slip the needle, or at least damn with faint praise, so I'm inclined to take him at face value here.  I'm certainly not enough of a fundamentals scout, to try to dispute his words.

    We used to have a platoon of Leius and Pags at 3rd.   Platoon of an outfield position actually makes a lot more sense since the being able to do more part includes late inning defensive or baserunning replacement which considering out outfield defense otherwise has a fair amount of value.     I am one of the few that would be fine if they just put him out there every day all season but being realistic and logical about it.   Its hard enough to hit major league pitching without it being from your non dominant side.   I never liked that he even started out being a switch hitter but with Buxton coming and possibly Rosario, if he goes down to work on his skills his callup will only be as 4th outfielder anyway.   I would think platoon is greater than 4th outfielder in terms of value and every team needs a 4th outfielder.  I get what you are saying though.  If the solution were clean cut we wouldn't be on here talking about it.      I have always like the idea of platooning one or two positions where it makes sense based on splits and this seems to be one of those cases. 

     

    The Pags-Leius platoon we really only effective the one year.  In 1992 they stunk - when you put their OPS+ together it was 101, which would have been fine if you put them together by averaging rather than by adding 75 (Leius) and 26 (Pags.)  The real combined OPS+ was closer to 75 than 26 because Pags only had 108 PA due to injuries, but still, the race that year might have been interesting longer if they had repeated the '91 performance.  In 93 it was Leius' turn to get hurt - 10 games, 22 PA - and Pags got traded to the O's in August that year to break up the duo.

     

    The 12 and 13 -man bullpens have really cut into the platooning possibilities, and the Twins really just hit on an ideal match in 1991.  In today's game, Leius would really have to play some SS and 2B, too (because there's no way Pagliarulo was going to do it.)  The platoon did help both, although it helped Pags more.  

    Here are their 1991 PA & OPS both with and without the platoon advantage:  Pags - 374 PA/.712 OPS vs.19 PA/566 OPS   Leius - 161/.872  vs. 74/.640. 

    Edited by gil4

    You'll buy respected, but want honest specified too?   :confused:   OK, consider it added.

     

    Anyway, Ryan has been known to slip the needle, or at least damn with faint praise, so I'm inclined to take him at face value here.  I'm certainly not enough of a fundamentals scout, to try to dispute his words.

    Perhaps Ryan's scale for good outfield defense is broken. For further evidence consider his Hunter comments.

    The more I think about it, the more I believe the Twins will keep him in the majors. I'm guessing his locker will be next to Hunter's locker.

     

    Agree completely. The Twins didn't bring in Hunter just to turn around and send Hicks to Rochester.

    I think he is still has some things to work on but I tend to agree with Ryan's assessment of Hicks' defense in the Offseason Handbook

     

    "[H]is defense and his throwing and his range and his jumps and his angles are pretty good. In fact, a lot of people will tell you it is better than pretty good."

     

    I'm not confident the 480 innings in center this year tells us much in terms of UZR performance. Inside Edge's fielding stats are a little more favorable towards him. I would consider him a "good" defender. The problem is, the Twins need a "great" defender in the outfield to work between Arcia and Hunter.

    I see a guy who CAN be a good defensive outfielder and in most situations is.  Again, I still think most of his issues start just below his hat.  I've spent a lot of time in my life working with young kids.  Each of  them responds differently to teaching/training/coaching/management.  Hopefully, the current staff will be the one able to get the message accross.

    I wonder if Hicks has reached point of where he needs fresh start with different organization. The problem with that for the Twins is that  they will get nothing for him. I wonder if somebody like Pittsburgh, Baltimore, or some other team couldn't fix him. I think his hitting has effected all of his game and now he's not playing very good baseball. The Twins trade of center fielders I believe in long run has been good the pitchers they have received could very well turn this franchise around. I believe we will see some of that this year when we get new pitching coaches and change in philosophy along with that from manager. The Twins have had several pitchers that were thought to be washed up and now have performed very well for Pittsburg. There organization has done wonderful job with Lariano and Worley in last couple of years the numbers speak for themselves. Also they were revaluating there organization after Mornea was there wondering why they couldn't get him to hit the way he was in Colorado. I have heard nothing of this from the Twins on their failures of Lariano or Worley and also Morneau. I think the Twins could be spending some time on this to as way to improve their team.

    Hicks is a useful player. He has a good arm. His acceptable CF play would be a plus on a corner. He had an OBP over 340. His career OPS against lefties is .758 (792 last year).

     

    He is young and will get better even without fixing. He could platoon with Arcia right now and be valuable.

    Honestly, I don't see anything in Hicks' past or present that says he will ever be a major league player.  Seriously, his swing from the left side is that bad and he got to the Majors?  IF management actually signed Tori Hunter to mentor Hicks, that's a pretty big waste of $10mil. There are coaches to do that.

     

    At this point in time, Hicks belongs in the minors.  Good defense does not makeup for the bad attitude, horrible batting skills and apparently not taking direction from the coaching staff, i.e.  he decided on his own to stop switch hitting.  He deserves to be at AA, where Doug M. can get him back on course. 

    I think Aaron Hicks will play 120+ games at CF. He doesn't need to get fixed. He's a human being. Maybe an attitude adjustment, maybe just another chance. I don't know, but he'll play at the MLB level, and that makes him a major league player. Everyone loves to talk about how Torii is a great clubhouse guy and a mentor. If that's the case, then Hicks should be on the way to getting "fixed" (but not losing his balls like my poor dog, Alfred).

    Am I the only one watching that swing of Hicks from the left side and seeing sooo many flaws?  His weight is shifted early, his bottom half is bailing toward first like a left handed curve ball was thrown and his top half is desperately reaching to the third base slide.  He'd be lucky get a foul ball on that swing.  Granted, it is only one really bad swing, but if my 11 year old swung like that, I'd stop and correct him.

    I think this is Aaron Hicks last chance to prove that he can play at the MLB level. I'm of the belief that Torii Hunter was offered considerably way more money to sign here rather than Texas and Hicks is the reason why. If I'm right Hicks is out of options, isn't even the future center or right fielder, and is on his last leg in the organization with his attitude.  If Torii cannot get him turned around, Hicks is done.  Plenty of other options remain for a future left fielder including Rosario, Kepler, Walker II, or even Travis Harrison.  Aaron, it's time to ^&*$ or get off the toilet dude. 

    It may be his last chance to be a regular CF, but he has demonstrated skills that can help a major league team.

     

    He can hit left handed pitching. He would be an above average defender on a corner. He is adequate in CF. Some team will give him a role platooning in RF with a guy that doesn't hit left handed pitching well and is limited defensively.

     

    His skills play well on a bench. Defensive replacement, pinch hitter against a LOOGY, pinch running and a platoon option on a corner.

     

    I would give him two more months to see if he can hit righties well enough to be a regular CF. Meanwhile Rosario is the AAA CF and Buxton is the AA CF. On June 1 if either is dominating while Hicks is struggling, they come up and take over and Hicks slides into a bench role and start him on a corner against lefties.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...