markos Provisional Member Posted May 20, 2014 Posted May 20, 2014 I think 90% of this discussion has come down to a debate about floor and ceiling of each player considered at #5, and the risks and likelihood associated with them meeting the ceiling. Maybe a relevant discussion would be to get a list of players considered at #5 and a rough framework of how that player projects. For the sake of this, I don't want to get into the business of predicting injuries. It is certainly an implied risk with pitchers more than position players. Here is a quick overview of Aiken, based on about 10 minutes of research: Best asset - 6'4 lefty. His stuff right now is 65 FB, 60 curve, 60 change, 60 control. Ceiling - Front line starter, tall lefty with 2-3 plus pitches and a mid 90's fastballFloor - If the scout ratings above are correct (where he is right now), #2 starter, very good #3 starter with no improvement to these.Key Risk - He is a high school pitcher List of players considered: Aiken, Rodon, Freeland, Jackson, Gordon, Touki, Nola, and Kolek. I don't have time to look at them all Quick overview of Gordon. Best asset - Legitimate shortstop. Ceiling - League average offense, plus baserunning, plus defense at SS. Think Jimmy Rollins.Floor - Hit and power tools don't develop. Ends up as a no-hit utility infielder.Key Risk(s) - Will the bat/approach develop? It will be the difference between him becoming a starter or a backup. Will any power develop? Difference between him becoming an All Star or just a guy. Non-zero risk that he won't stick at short, but that is less of a risk than the questions about his bat.Wildcard - Hit 90+ with a decent curve. May be able to salvage career as a bullpen arm if everything else goes to hell.
Jeremy Nygaard Twins Daily Contributor Posted May 20, 2014 Posted May 20, 2014 I'll take the J-Roll comp. I took a lot of crap yesterday with the Simmons comp. Offensively, they're relatively similar, though Gordon will never steal 40 bases or hit 30 home runs (both things Rollins did). But I think that's a fair assessment. I'd put Gordon's defensively ceiling higher than Rollins too...(but four Gold Gloves might be too much to ask). That's the thing with comps, they're never perfect. (Did you know that Rollins won a 2012 Gold Glove with a 0.0 dWAR?)
tobi0040 Verified Member Posted May 20, 2014 Posted May 20, 2014 I'll take the J-Roll comp. I took a lot of crap yesterday with the Simmons comp. Offensively, they're relatively similar, though Gordon will never steal 40 bases or hit 30 home runs (both things Rollins did). But I think that's a fair assessment. I'd put Gordon's defensively ceiling higher than Rollins too...(but four Gold Gloves might be too much to ask). That's the thing with comps, they're never perfect. (Did you know that Rollins won a 2012 Gold Glove with a 0.0 dWAR?) Jeremy, I think the "crap" yesterday got a little twisted. You said offensively he could become Simmons, I pointed out that Simmons bat isn't very impressive. Then others tried stating I didnt' see the value in Simmons, which is almost all based on his glove. If I came off as attacking your comp, that wasn't my point, sorry.
cmb0252 Provisional Member Posted May 21, 2014 Author Posted May 21, 2014 Miley McDaniel's new draft board: http://sbb.scout.com/story/1404313
cmb0252 Provisional Member Posted May 21, 2014 Author Posted May 21, 2014 Pentecost ahead of Jackson? I guess he likes the fact he is a true catcher. Pentecost has been killing the ball as of late and is a rare catcher who can steal bases.
markos Provisional Member Posted May 21, 2014 Posted May 21, 2014 I'll take the J-Roll comp. I took a lot of crap yesterday with the Simmons comp. Offensively, they're relatively similar, though Gordon will never steal 40 bases or hit 30 home runs (both things Rollins did). But I think that's a fair assessment. I'd put Gordon's defensively ceiling higher than Rollins too...(but four Gold Gloves might be too much to ask). That's the thing with comps, they're never perfect. (Did you know that Rollins won a 2012 Gold Glove with a 0.0 dWAR?) Good point about Rollins. The comp was focused on the normal Rollins seasons (10-20 HR, 30+ SB), not his 2006-2007 peak where he was hitting 25+ HRs with 40+ SB. I haven't seen anyone project Gordon with that kind of power. Though I don't think anyone projected Rollins to have that kind of power either.
nicksaviking Community Moderator Posted May 21, 2014 Posted May 21, 2014 Interestingly he has Justus Sheffield, Jacob Gatewood, Monte Harrison and Michael Gettys lower than pick 46. I'm still inclined to think guys like this will be gone, but maybe the Twins will have a shot at one of these high upside HS kids.
kab21 Verified Member Posted May 21, 2014 Posted May 21, 2014 Interestingly he has Justus Sheffield, Jacob Gatewood, Monte Harrison and Michael Gettys lower than pick 46. I'm still inclined to think guys like this will be gone, but maybe the Twins will have a shot at one of these high upside HS kids. The problem is that you need to pay them top 15 or top 20 money or else they usually go to college. With the new slotting system that means that the Twins need to go a lot underslot with their first pick.
tobi0040 Verified Member Posted May 21, 2014 Posted May 21, 2014 The problem is that you need to pay them top 15 or top 20 money or else they usually go to college. With the new slotting system that means that the Twins need to go a lot underslot with their first pick. Going under slot at #5 isn't the only way. Kohl received a bonus right at slot last year and we still were able to give Gonslaves $700K, much more than his $460K slot. We did that primarily by giving only 40K to our 9th round pick. I understand Gonslaves was a 4th round pick, but you can be creative.
kab21 Verified Member Posted May 21, 2014 Posted May 21, 2014 Going under slot at #5 isn't the only way. Kohl received a bonus right at slot last year and we still were able to give Gonslaves $700K, much more than his $460K slot. We did that primarily by giving only 40K to our 9th round pick. I understand Gonslaves was a 4th round pick, but you can be creative. Try coming up with an extra 600K-1M using these methods. That's what they need to find to sign some of these overslot HS'ers.
tobi0040 Verified Member Posted May 21, 2014 Posted May 21, 2014 Try coming up with an extra 600K-1M using these methods. That's what they need to find to sign some of these overslot HS'ers. The 46th pick is has a value of 1.21M. The 20th pick has a value of $2.03M. We came up with $240K in savings last year through later rounds. So we are $580K short. Last year Appel signed for $1.44M less than slot, Gray signed for $800K less than slot. Frazier signed for $280K less than slot. So not paying at slot at #5 and being creative in the later rounds seems feasible to me. The bigger issue is who will be available at #46? Houston and the Marlins have used this strategy in the past and have multiple picks before us, so do the Royals and Indians.
diehardtwinsfan Old-Timey Member Posted May 21, 2014 Posted May 21, 2014 keep in mind that there's a certain overall percentage that you can go overslot with without penalty. That adds some wiggle room there.
maxisagod Verified Member Posted May 21, 2014 Posted May 21, 2014 Interestingly he has Justus Sheffield, Jacob Gatewood, Monte Harrison and Michael Gettys lower than pick 46. I'm still inclined to think guys like this will be gone, but maybe the Twins will have a shot at one of these high upside HS kids. All 3 I'd love at pick 46.
cmb0252 Provisional Member Posted May 22, 2014 Author Posted May 22, 2014 Callis answered a few questions about top prospects today. Here is a link: http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article/mlb/pipeline-inbox-whose-draft-stock-is-rising?ymd=20140522&content_id=76362818&vkey=news_mlb
cmb0252 Provisional Member Posted May 22, 2014 Author Posted May 22, 2014 BA's new board: 1. Aiken2. Kolek3. Rodon4. Jackson5. Freeland6. Hoffman7. Gordon8. Fedde9. Finnegan10. Nola Interesting board with Hoffman/Fedde still that high. Here is the link: http://www.baseballamerica.com/draft-preview/
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted May 22, 2014 Posted May 22, 2014 SI's mock draft is a bit different than most - http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/mlb/news/20140522/mlb-mock-draft-2014-carlos-rodon-dave-perkin/?eref=sihp Twins take Beede, Nola falls to #9, Gordon #10 and Gatewood goes #7 to Philly. But he does have Burdi going to Detroit.
cmb0252 Provisional Member Posted May 22, 2014 Author Posted May 22, 2014 SI's mock draft is a bit different than most - http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/mlb/news/20140522/mlb-mock-draft-2014-carlos-rodon-dave-perkin/?eref=sihp Twins take Beede, Nola falls to #9, Gordon #10 and Gatewood goes #7 to Philly. But he does have Burdi going to Detroit. Wow....what an odd mock. A lot of strange picks.
nicksaviking Community Moderator Posted May 22, 2014 Posted May 22, 2014 That is a unique mock. Looking at the cover pic, Rodon should be the clear choice. Just think how good he could be after someone teaches him to pitch with his eyes open! http://i2.cdn.turner.com/si/dam/assets/140518122503-carlos-rodon-ap2-single-image-cut.jpg
cmb0252 Provisional Member Posted May 22, 2014 Author Posted May 22, 2014 From Law: White Sox in heavy on Nola today - I saw Kenny Williams Jr and I was told reinsdorf is here too.
cmb0252 Provisional Member Posted May 22, 2014 Author Posted May 22, 2014 A note on the Law tweet, with how few top talents are left playing it shouldn't be that much of a surprise.
twinsfanstreif Provisional Member Posted May 23, 2014 Posted May 23, 2014 Does Nola remind anyone of Radke? Control guy, several slightly above average pitches, even their wind up looks similar. Although not spectacular I would take another Radke at #5 to pair with Meyer!
John Bonnes Site Manager Posted May 23, 2014 Posted May 23, 2014 That is a unique mock. Looking at the cover pic, Rodon should be the clear choice. Just think how good he could be after someone teaches him to pitch with his eyes open! http://i2.cdn.turner.com/si/dam/assets/140518122503-carlos-rodon-ap2-single-image-cut.jpg He's breathing through his eyelids, like the lava lizards of the Galapagos Islands.
tobi0040 Verified Member Posted May 23, 2014 Posted May 23, 2014 SI's mock draft is a bit different than most - http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/mlb/news/20140522/mlb-mock-draft-2014-carlos-rodon-dave-perkin/?eref=sihp Twins take Beede, Nola falls to #9, Gordon #10 and Gatewood goes #7 to Philly. But he does have Burdi going to Detroit. This would be a huge shock, Beeds has walked 4.5 guys per 9, to see the Twins take him over Gordon or Nola, I don't see this happening.
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted May 23, 2014 Posted May 23, 2014 This would be a huge shock, Beeds has walked 4.5 guys per 9, to see the Twins take him over Gordon or Nola, I don't see this happening. Yeah, me neither - unless he falls to #46
2wins87 Verified Member Posted May 23, 2014 Posted May 23, 2014 Matt Garrioch of Minor League Ball has compiled his list of the 350 best draft prospects: http://www.minorleagueball.com/2014/5/23/5743674/2014-mlb-draft-top-350-prospects He often has pretty different opinions from other analysts.
cmb0252 Provisional Member Posted May 23, 2014 Author Posted May 23, 2014 New mock draft from BA is up and there is a shake up in the top 5 picks. Twins end up taking kolek. Here is the link: http://www.baseballamerica.com/draft/2014-draft-preview-shakeup-atop-mock-draft-3-0/
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted May 23, 2014 Posted May 23, 2014 I'd be happy with Kolek, that's for sure. First time I've heard that Rodon might not be a starter. That's scary. Seems like a deep draft but no elite super high end talent.
Twins Twerp Provisional Member Posted May 23, 2014 Posted May 23, 2014 i'd be happy with kolek, that's for sure. First time i've heard that rodon might not be a starter. That's scary. Seems like a deep draft but no elite super high end talent.boing!!
Billy Amick Wichita Wind Surge - AA 1B/3B Despite hitting just .194, the 23-year-old ranks fourth in the Texas League in Home Runs (17) and sixth in RBI (50). Explore Billy Amick News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.