Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
35 minutes ago, jmlease1 said:

The Twins traded their best two right-handed hitters? Byron Buxton would like a word. :P

 

He should have stated that they were the two best "full-time" righthanded hitters. Part-time players usually aren't included in discussions.

Knowing the Twins way they will opt for Pathway #4.

Posted
18 hours ago, Jamie Cameron said:

That got me too. It's an insanely narrow path, though.

 

18 hours ago, LastOnePicked said:

Thoughtful pathways here. Good stuff. We'll see if any of these options are taken.

Personally, I can't wrap my head around the idea that a pathetic 73-89 team can:

a) lose it's two top starters

b) lose it's three top sluggers

c) become defensively weaker in the IF

d) sign not a single impact FA pitcher

e) face improved competition in its division

and still be projected for an 11-win improvement. Now that's fun with numbers! Let the games begin and these projections can be put to the test.

EXACTLY what I was thinking. Well said

 

Posted
14 hours ago, h2oface said:

We? Just an example. Check all you want. It will just confirm it. (The link shows all the divisions for 2021. Plenty more right there for starters. Braves, Giants, Padres, Diamondbacks, Cubs, Cardinals, Mets, Red Sox, Angels, Mariners, Nationals, Rays..... about half the predictions not even close...... )

League-wide, they did VERY well.  I think it came out almost exactly at .500, just as predicted.

Posted
6 hours ago, rv78 said:

He should have stated that they were the two best "full-time" righthanded hitters. Part-time players usually aren't included in discussions.

Knowing the Twins way they will opt for Pathway #4.

Byron Buxton has played more games over the past three seasons than Mitch Garver (admittedly, it's close).

Posted

Fangraphs now has them at 80. I'd split the difference.

In @John Bonnes, "gun to my head" fashion, I'll take the under on 84, but I'm not putting money on it.

There are much better over/under bets on the table that you don't have to lay money on a such a narrow margin as PECOTA offers. 

Now, the Yankees under 98 and the Red Sox over 83, those are good bets. And the annual Angels under is looking strong once again. The Tigers over looks good too. PECOTA doesn't seem to have any glaring misses in the NL from a quick glance. Maybe an over on the Giants?

Twins Daily Contributor
Posted
9 hours ago, RDLARK said:

LOL. I literally just put (and then deleted when I saw yours) this same comment.

Embarrassing! lol. I feel like it happens to me a lot where I forget basic facts!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...