alarp33 Provisional Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 I'm saying he's a useful player who, when used right, has value. At his age, are you really going to cut him when you could demote Polanco or someone for a couple weeks to let Plouffe regain value? Useful, how? He can't hit, field or steal bases. Value in which way? He's been the least valuable player in baseball since the start of 2015. Yes, I am.
Brandon Warne Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 Not playing them well.....and I guess we should ignore the last two years? Do people really think Santana is a good MLB player now? He's a 25th man who plays all over. I wouldn't call that a good player, but it's useful.
Brandon Warne Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 Useful, how? He can't hit, field or steal bases. Value in which way? He's been the least valuable player in baseball since the start of 2015. Yes, I am. OK.
Brandon Warne Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 what is two years going to tell you that the last 55 PAs won't? :-) That you're choosing to leave out the year before, which -- while heavily BABIP-influenced -- still happened.
jimmer Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 Santana plays all over because Molitor tells him to. Any player can play all over if their manager wants them too. Doesn't mean they should or that they are competent at doing so.
alarp33 Provisional Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 He's a 25th man who plays all over. I wouldn't call that a good player, but it's useful. I love the "25th man" argument that we see around here on occasion, like that somehow is a positive.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 Santana also pinch runs a lot and tries to steal a lot.....that makes him more valuable I guess....
Brandon Warne Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 He's 25, a career .274/.308/.393 hitter and gives you a body who can play all over. There's zero percent chance he'll be DFA'd, whether people like it or not. And again at 25....you can hate on him all you want but guys can and do get better from that age. Sort of like how he has from last year to this year, at least so far.
Brandon Warne Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 Santana also pinch runs a lot and tries to steal a lot.....that makes him more valuable I guess.... Well, no. But in a ****ty season you might as well see what you have and see if a guy with good physical tools can learn to make himself a better player, rather than outright cutting him and letting someone else do it. I'm not a big Santana fan. Not at all. But this is preposterous.
jimmer Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 Santana also pinch runs a lot and tries to steal a lot.....that makes him more valuable I guess....except he keeps getting thrown out. he's completely negated what little value stolen bases have.
jimmer Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 I love the "25th man" argument that we see around here on occasion, like that somehow is a positive. right up there with the 5th starter argument., gets used for like 6 starters a year :-)
Brandon Warne Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 except he keeps getting thrown out. he's completely negated what little value stolen bases have. I'm aware of that. But because it's been that way in the past doesn't mean it's going to stay that way.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 I'd 100% more see what Polanco has to offer, since we don't know much, and he was MUCH better in the minors, than see what Santana can maybe do in the next month. If my choice is more Santana or more Polanco, that's an easy choice of Polanco for me. Does anyone think he'd get claimed if they tried to send him down?
jimmer Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 That you're choosing to leave out the year before, which -- while heavily BABIP-influenced -- still happened. when it's completely non-repeatable (as the last two years have predictably shown), it's easy to discard. Like Hughes 2014, for example.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 except he keeps getting thrown out. he's completely negated what little value stolen bases have. Uh, that was my point.....
drivlikejehu Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 So wait - we want to give a sub-replacement-level player lots of ABs in the Majors, but have Sano try to get back on track in AAA? Hmm, ok, going to have to disagree with that one.
alarp33 Provisional Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 Well, no. But in a ****ty season you might as well see what you have and see if a guy with good physical tools can learn to make himself a better player, rather than outright cutting him and letting someone else do it. I'm not a big Santana fan. Not at all. But this is preposterous. I'd rather see what I have got with players who have a future on this team. Its preposterous to want to cut the worst player in baseball, rather than continue to start him. Just a reminder, his Minors track record isn't much better than his Majors
jimmer Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 So wait - we want to give a sub-replacement-level player lots of ABs in the Majors, but have Sano try to get back on track in AAA? Hmm, ok, going to have to disagree with that one.no WE don't. A select few think Santana should be on a major league 25 man roster.
Brandon Warne Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 I'd 100% more see what Polanco has to offer, since we don't know much, and he was MUCH better in the minors, than see what Santana can maybe do in the next month. If my choice is more Santana or more Polanco, that's an easy choice of Polanco for me. Does anyone think he'd get claimed if they tried to send him down? All that is cool until you consider that the move to make is bringing Plouffe back. Where are you putting Polanco after that
Brandon Warne Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 So wait - we want to give a sub-replacement-level player lots of ABs in the Majors Nobody made that argument, but nice try.
Brandon Warne Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 no WE don't. A select few think Santana should be on a major league 25 man roster. It's comparing apples to oranges: Jorge Polanco is an every day player. Danny Santana is not.
Brandon Warne Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 I'd rather see what I have got with players who have a future on this team. Its preposterous to want to cut the worst player in baseball, rather than continue to start him. Just a reminder, his Minors track record isn't much better than his Majors Cut the worst player in baseball rather than start him? You've lost me there.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 Polanco plays 80% of the games between 3B, 2B, DH, and maybe even OF (not my top choice at all). Plouffe plays 3B when Polacno isn't, some DH, and sits around a lot.
alarp33 Provisional Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 Cut the worst player in baseball rather than start him? You've lost me there. You called it preposterous to want to cut him. He's the worst player in baseball (by WAR). He starts nearly every night.
Brandon Warne Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 Polanco plays 80% of the games between 3B, 2B, DH, and maybe even OF (not my top choice at all). Plouffe plays 3B when Polacno isn't, some DH, and sits around a lot. OK, so then you're sitting Sano and Dozier way, way more than you want to. Again, not trading Plouffe put you into this problem, but the fact of the matter is you've got to fix it one way or another. Sending Polanco out -- or Vargas, whatever -- is probably the move they'll make.
Brandon Warne Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 You called it preposterous to want to cut him. He's the worst player in baseball (by WAR). He starts nearly every night. No way. Alexei Ramirez, Prince Fielder.....those guys are all way worse. By fWAR, Santana is about neutral.
jimmer Verified Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 You called it preposterous to want to cut him. He's the worst player in baseball (by WAR). He starts nearly every night. When you take into account his time on the DL, he has started a pretty high percentage of games
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 I hope not......I'd just waive Plouffe at this point and hope someone takes him. If not, cut him. Cold to be sure. If Sano is here, Plouffe should not be here next year. I'm assuming Sano is here.I agree, the combo isn't perfect.....but there should be room to keep Sano, Dozier, Vargas, Polanco all playing 80% or so of the time. Dozier doesn't need to play every day.
alarp33 Provisional Member Posted August 3, 2016 Posted August 3, 2016 No way. Alexei Ramirez, Prince Fielder.....those guys are all way worse. By fWAR, Santana is about neutral. Sorry for not clarifying, the worst player in baseball since the start of 2015.. not just this seasons small sample. -2.8 bWAR
Marek Houston Wichita Wind Surge - AA SS Houston went 3-for-4. He's hitting .333/.415/.505 (.920) since joining the Kernels. He added his fifth and sixth doubles. Explore Marek Houston News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.