Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    24,960

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    126

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by nicksaviking

  1. nicksaviking
    Adding the sinker isn't going to help the strikeout numbers. I think he can be good, but without missing bats, he's giving off some Josh Winder vibes.
  2. nicksaviking
    Terry Ryan's reluctance to give out long term deals to Santana and Hunter was likely a big reason he was pushed out in favor of Bill Smith. The Twins were getting a new stadium and wanted to make sure Mauer and Morneau were still there long term and Ryan clearly couldn't stomach such contracts. But I'm not sure a long term deal for Santana wouldn't have worked out better for the Twins. Yes, he was out for the 2011 season which may have been unavoidable, but when he returned in 2012, he was back to his dominant self. He was probably the Cy Young front runner after throwing his infamous 134 pitch no-hitter on June 1st. That no hitter was important to the Mets as they had never had one, but Santana never recovered. His shoulder was shot and he limped out a couple of more months before having to shut down his career for good. I know pitch counts aren't popular, but no way the Twins would have been that irresponsible. Heck, they took him out during his 17 strikeout game when he had a chance to tie the all time record of 20.
  3. nicksaviking
    I don't want Baldelli as manager. Are you asking what is the Pohlad's argument against firing Baldelli? Apathy. Sorry, for as much as fans on this board care and want a new manager, the general public doesn't care and firing a manager would look like waiving a white flag to those people, further signaling a lost year to them and dysfunction to prospective buyers. They won't get more fans nor more buyers by firing the manager, so it's not important to them. If Baldelli is fired, it will be because Falvey talks ownership into it, in a desperate attempt to save HIS job.
  4. nicksaviking
    Seems like something you might want to do BEFORE they make a dozen errors.
  5. nicksaviking
    I can find a dozen players I'm OK removing from the 40-man.........
  6. nicksaviking
    Well written. Great article Matthew.
  7. nicksaviking
    Miranda, Julien, Buxton, Lewis, Jeffers. The drastic year-to-year strikeout increase/decrease and the drastic year-to-year offensive production increase/decrease is NOT isolated to just Larnach; this seems to be systematic. I applaud the team for seeing an issue and trying to remedy the situation. But they are TERRIBLE at it. They clearly do not have the remedy.
  8. nicksaviking
    Right, but none of your bullet points will improve attendance or TV ratings. Hence, there is no impetus for doing any of them other than selling the team.
  9. nicksaviking
    "When an aggressive hitter gets even more aggressive, then there’s probably overaggressiveness," Rocco Baldelli
  10. nicksaviking
    The impetus is selling the team at an inflated price, not winning a World Series. Firing the manager probably isn't even close to a thought for them right now.
  11. nicksaviking
    Yeah, I'll tune that nonsense out. I want to hear Correa had player X, Y and/or Z crossing home plate. If the coaches and manager don't have those guys that need it in the cages instead of the freakin' shortstop, what the hell are they even doing?
  12. nicksaviking
    Right, hence the 'regrettable contract' caveat to my post. I also always like the Mauer 'leads by example' bit we always heard. That one was a classic.
  13. nicksaviking
    Right, even if a pitcher had to hit, he would have at least laid down a bunt on the 3B side, not the 1B side like Gasper did!
  14. nicksaviking
    Man, that was close. Gasper had a real shot to make me eat my words.
  15. nicksaviking
    I have and will never praise a player for their leadership. With this club, that trait seems to be used almost exclusively to excuse either a bad player or a regrettable contract. I only care what these guys do on the diamond, and that's how it should be.
  16. nicksaviking
    It's funny that the Twins always have their OWN Micky Gasper, whether it's Keirsey, or Michael Helman or Jair Camargo or Chris Williams or Mark Contreras, but they have no interest in giving those guys a look unless they absolutely have to. But you get some other team's Gasper or Andrew Stevenson or Ryan Lamarre, oh boy, we found a diamond in the rough here fellas, wait until the league sees what we do with this guy! The grass is always greener with this club.
  17. nicksaviking
    Why would anything need to be in print? I don't see this team firing Baldelli even if they lose their next 20 games, but in every other clubhouse, the manager would clearly be on the hot seat. He should be worried, the players should be worried, but they clearly aren't, which to me is not an endorsement of Baldelli.
  18. nicksaviking
    I can't stand the hand wringing about having a game where you are forced to lose the DH. This is a complete lack of critical thinking. Oh, no, we lose the DH for one whole at bat! The DH in this case being Mickey Gaspar, who has two whole hits this year makes it even more of non-issue. Not. A. Big. Deal.
  19. nicksaviking
    These guys have to know their manager is on the hot seat, yet they still play like.....they don't care? That probably says all we need to know about this team right now.
  20. nicksaviking
  21. nicksaviking
    Wait, I'm not watching the HS game right now on Friday night?
  22. nicksaviking
    Fingers crossed, I'm still hopeful of all of them, but this team has had that caliber of offensive prospects in the system for about a decade and it's not paying off. I'd like them to keep at it until it does. By them, I mean generically the Twins; I don't need the same people running the show making the same decisions any longer.
  23. nicksaviking
    With the sorry state of this team's offense, I'm really not thinking about rankings because rankings are going to take positional adjustments in to play. A CF or a Catcher who can stick at the position but has a lesser bat will get a boost in the rankings. I know no one wants to go back to the corner-bat frenzy days we had about five years ago, but this team desperately needs a perennial .850+ OPS (really .900+) hitter. And really, outside of Wallner, does this team even have corner players anymore? Runs, runs and more runs please.
  24. nicksaviking
    Golden is a decent ways away from Coors Field. Tons of craft breweries in the area though. Really good ones too. I'm a foodie and like craft beer (did I mention that?), so I like the River North (RiNo) district northeast of the stadium. Also, there is an absolutely gonzo interactive modern art attraction called Meow Wolf over by Mile High Stadium. Kids will love it, adults will be amused by it, and adults who partake in the types of consumption that Colorado has become known for, will likely enjoy it the most.
  25. nicksaviking
    The Twins don't have a specific position of need, they have specific lineup spot needs. I know they've tried and failed with many picks, but this team absolutely HAS to start finding middle of the lineup bats. And they need them for more than just the middle of the lineup. I don't think this team can be cute trying to draft a position they want, they have to draft the best hitters. And I know that's not a popular sentiment. But they aren't winning anything meaningful until they can start to put together a lineup other teams dread facing.
×
×
  • Create New...