Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

KirbyDome89

Verified Member
  • Posts

    4,562
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by KirbyDome89

  1. NY has been without one of the best pitchers in baseball all season....
  2. The Sox are clearly worse than last year. I think Detroit finishes with a worse record than 2023 as well. KC isn't going to lose 106 games but I think there's a correction coming their way. Cleveland is the wildcard. I'm more interested to see whether they can maintain average offensive production for the entire season. I know their pitching is erratic at the moment, but I guess I have more faith that'll work itself out. I honestly don't know what to think about the Twins at the moment. They're hot, which is great, but their lineup still has massive question marks, and as has already been pointed out, they need last season's SP luck again. All in, the division is better with KC not being a doormat and Cleveland being a tbd team rather than one struggling to stay at .500. This feels like the ALC we know and love, mediocre at best, but not historically awful.
  3. Separating pitching and hitting is where I'd start since this thread is about a pitching pipeline. Where are the arms ready to establish themselves so the Twins aren't scraping the bottom of the barrel for guys like Happ, Bundy, Archer, or Shoemaker to fill out a rotation? Why are they gambling on Tyler Mahle midseason, or making a move for Paddack, who also had know durability issues? Why are they trading for DeSclafani this offseason? The rotation has been healthy (sans the dubious DeSclafani gamble) this year yet they're one injury away from choosing between rushing Varland back for his 3rd shot at sticking or plugging in another washed up vet a la Keuchel last year. None of this touches on the players acquired via FA or trade in just the last few years that weren't disasters but fail to meet your criteria.
  4. If you have to use 4 SWR starts this season as evidence of a "pipeline," then I'd argue you don't have one... I've seen a lot of "why does it matter how they acquire pitching," comments throughout the thread. Falvey's pitch upon hire was building a sustainable winner. Consistently having to dip into FA, or trade for SP isn't sustainable for this organization. Also, naming the next X number of guys on the way up is something every other fanbase can do. Just go back a few years, guys like Winder, Balazovic, Thorpe, yada yada were all being talked about the same way. Quality is what's in question.
  5. If the Twins are getting blown out and playing like ****, am I trolling if I finally chime in to point out that random reliever X had a good inning in the 8th? I'd vote no. If you think they're posting comments they themselves don't believe to elicit a reaction from others, ok. I doubt that's the case often, if ever. I think the "fire Rocco," crowd actually wants him fired. Ditto for any other tiresome talking point or in game criticism. TD is a pretty niche spot to troll. I'm not saying it's impossible, but the ROI for devoting your own time to trolling game threads has to be pretty terrible. You can put that drunk in a soundproof box, and make him invisible, whether through site tools or your own filtering. The flick of a middle finger works wonders. I don't find the experience as grating, or oppressive, but different strokes for different folks, there are certainly posters, comments, or articles on this site that annoy me to no end. You're right, game threads aren't regular topic threads, which is why I expect them to be more volatile.
  6. And when things aren't going poorly, those posters aren't nearly as prevalent. I think that is the natural flow. I'm not implying in any way this topic isn't worth discussion. Conducive, constructive, ect are just as subjective as positive and negative. No matter your disposition, you'll find a way to be annoyed, or entertained in those threads. I don't view them any differently than the articles/comments on the rest of the site. If you feel that the effort that goes into filtering doesn't provide an acceptable return, fair, I'm not sure I agree though.
  7. I can only speak for myself, but I think this is just the nature of the beast with game threads. Baseball is so much about the macro; sometimes it's nice to just live in the moment so to speak. I might ignore 2/3 of what's posted, depending on who posts it, but the overall tone of the thread ebbs and flows with how the game is going, and I'm ok with that.
  8. This is the key. Margot's perceived ceiling, and his role on this team, doesn't justify waiting around and hoping he bounces back. Keirsey could be a total flop, but he at least has options remaining. If the Twins can't rotate through internal candidates, they no doubt could scour the streets for a LF/RF who is average at best with the glove and provides nothing offensively.
  9. Incompetent ownership, failed development, "rebuilding," again probably have a lot more to do with it.
  10. Every team has ****y games. We've seen plenty from this Twins squad over the last few years, but my god how the **** can a team (Chicago) be this consistently awful, in every way.
  11. Defensively it'd make sense to have an actual CF'er. That of course assumes he can be at least passable with the bat. Good thing they went out and got Margot...
  12. Don't worry folks, the Sox still have to trot their bullpen back out there....
  13. I think they're still driving nails in. LaRussa back with org in any sort of role is a joke. Struggling with player development and then promoting the director of that department to GM is hilarious as well. They're a clown show.
  14. So much this. They're so laughably bad that I fully expect to watch their bullpen to implode and toss this game tonight, then their lineup will bottom out against Ober tomorrow.
  15. Just died laughing. The Sox announcers: "The ALC is tough this year, 4 teams with winning records so far. The Sox are 2-16 vs. the Central." Holy ****. No chance Chicago is just historically awful and buoying the W/L records right? The mental gymnastics are actually kinda impressive.
  16. Lol at that being scored a triple. Also, the Sox broadcast is bemoaning Castro "tormenting," their team. I can barely watch a few innings of this dumpster fire as a Twins fan. Can't imagine 162 games....
  17. This. The double standard is laughable at times. The end was bad (it's rarely, if ever, good) and Sano didn't meet expectations for most of the fan base, but he was a top 10 prospect in baseball at a time when the Twins were losing 90+ games annually, so good luck delivering on that level of hope.
  18. There's a Sox fan who has started betting $100 daily against Chicago. Probably the most interesting thing for that base to follow at the moment. He's up nearly $200 btw... Also, they're trying to get a posse together to vote Maldonado into the ASG. Low key I hope it happens.
  19. I think the better question is how, not when. I mean call me when they get there, but it obviously isn't happening right now. They'll be lucky to finish April with 5 wins. They're playing at a sub replacement level. The Sox are a major league team in name only, so yeah, I'm going to dismiss any sort of meaning others want to attach to these wins, and no, I don't expect you to convince me otherwise. Like I said, luckily for the Twins every W carries the same weight. Neither implication was intended if that's what you took from my response.
  20. The Sox are averaging less than one win per week. Highly unlikely that pace lasts all year, but that's who they are right now, ****ing terrible not just run of the mill bad, and that matters too. May 1st is one week from today, and they've won 3 games. That's enough to diminish any sort of excitement for me personally. Luckily for the Twins, all wins count the same. Ok, now double the number of games against Texas, and Houston, and Seattle. Each of those divisions had at minimum three teams fighting for playoff spots. Every team in the ALC folded by the trade deadline. Hell, Cleveland led the division at the All Star break and couldn't be bothered to even stand pat. You mentioned margin for error earlier, no division last year provided a wider margin than the ALC. The Twins would've been all but buried in either the East of West if they played like they did for the first 2/3 of last season. They weren't catching the easiest schedule in baseball to save their asses post deadline. We do agree on one thing; the Twins need to show up every game.
  21. They're 28th in team ERA. I think they just suck all around...
×
×
  • Create New...