Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

EGFTShaw

Verified Member
  • Posts

    408
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by EGFTShaw

  1. Do Twins Daily Caretakes get this list all at once? Asking for a friend...😉
  2. Two at the moment: Nelson Cruz C4 These are signings and not trades then signing longer term.
  3. Monetary: Is overall cash revenues greater than before player X was traded? With the recent LArraez trade I think they will be. But I don't think is an indicator of his popularity. This may simply be the Twins overall are better to watch and winning more. Fan Morale: I think it will dip a bit, but not to far when it comes to Arraez simply because we netted a need that every Twins fan knew needed. Quality Pitching. Had the return been Archer/Pagan then you might see a difference. Team Morale: This will dip among the Tres Amigos, Miranda, Arraez and El Otro Muchacho (can't remember his name...), but for the full clubhouse? I don't think so. Similar way to measure any fan favorite that gets traded. If we had done Puckett for Greg Maddox (I think their timelines crossed properly) that would have been interesting. HUGE favorite in Puckett and Maddox HoF pitcher's pitcher. (NOTE: don't debate the trade idea, it was to illustrate that the bigger the fan favorite the bigger the prize coming back has to be.) If you want to investigate this more, go outside of baseball and into the Wayne Gretsky Trade to LA Kings. It should provide more extremes to help answer your question and refine your metrics.
  4. On another thread I said if Twins injuries regress back to the norm for MLB teams they will run away with the division. Guardians are good, but very gettable. I think the depth and potential with a year of normal health for the players, they will win the division easily. So, I'll take the over on your 5+. 💪
  5. If by developing your "own" is drafting them (or international signing), and seeing them until they make the Big Leagues, then the best MN Pitcher of this century doesn't qualify. Neither do the best relievers of this century. I think the key here is, how do you build your team and can you repeatedly do this. So, despite the prospects we have sent out, (perhaps with the exception of of Perry), we have plenty still in the pipeline. It can be argued that this is sustainable because they are getting prospects (draft, Int signings, trades) that either develop into quality players or are used to attain quality players. So, after sending prospects to the Reds and the Marlins (along with the reigning batting champ) when you see the prospect list being put out by either Twins Daily, The Athletic, MLB Pipeline you will find that there are pieces in the play that can continue to improve this team. Plus, we have the #5 draft pick. After signing C4, making a move to add quality depth to our pitching staff AND the prospects both knocking at the door and those who will be knocking at the door in a few years, I am very happy with where we stand vs the past 20 years. Now for a Lefty Reliever...
  6. D@mn near identical to what I was thinking. I initially slid Gallo in at the 4-spot pushing AK47 and Miranda down one spot each. But I am good with this as well.
  7. This team is setup as better talent than the 2019 team. Which is exciting. Everything about baseball is about health. My prediction, if the Twins regress to the norm for days missed to injury, this team runs away with the Division. Not that this is a high bar, but after the past 2 seasons this is euphoric. 💪
  8. Data is incomplete. Your use of examples started last year with Paddock. The FO is simply doing what they can since 2021, because I never really saw it before although it may have been a case that you needed to prove to the owners the previous path wasn't going to work, of going after good pitchers via trade vs the pervious scrap heap/reclamation type. Maeda could be lumped in with the others, I guess. Gray - Trade Paddock - Trade Mahle - Trade Ryan - Trade although he hadn't been an established MLB pitcher at the time.
  9. This is what I have been telling everyone, especially friends in fantasy baseball leagues...take Polanco every other year.
  10. I think what has BITTEN us over and over again is the idea of being able to pull miracles out of the scrap bin. I'm all for bargain shopping and hoping you strike lightning in a bottle, but it cannot be your primary way of fixing your problems. Starting last off season with Buxton, this is the first time I have seen the Twins in the course of 12 months seriously try to improve the team. Say what you want about how C4 fell into our lap last spring, but if our FO had not been creative we would not have C4 now. After the bad taste left by SFG and NYM, C4 and his family appreciate the MN Nice. And C4 is the trailblazer. The Twins could continue, with proper restraint, this trend.
  11. This is much ado about nothing. Seriously. Paddock? Keeping a pitcher on staff while he recovers at $2.5M. Big Mike was a good example of doing this. FrankieM - I was not on board with this, (and I am NOT the FO...LOL), but he didn't move the needle enough to warrant swinging a trade. If I had Garret Cole, sure because the Frankie fills in a need of a quality 3-4 starter. Donaldson - it wasn't his injuries that BIT the Twins. Correa - this speculative bashing of Correa over 1 Drs report, (SFG and NYM used the same Dr), is ludicrous. Dyson - bad example as there was no indication of an injury. The point of the thread was, at least as I interpreted it, was the Twins investing in players with a known injury history. The only ones listed here that really fits that premise is Paddock and it's for $2.5M for a player that could be an MLB starter and Buxton who everyone agrees that if he performs as at his injured rate is still a bargain.
  12. Exactly. it wasn't a debate over who to keep or trade, but if there was a parallel between Duran (or anyone) and Arraez when it comes to trading them at the peak of their value. We have some history with Arraez. He can hit and he has skeptical knees. We have less history with Duran, he was LIGHTS OUT this year as a reliever but problematic staying healthy the previous years. Also, relievers are notoriously unpredictable. You're are banking on this being the best time to trade Arraez. Not everyone agrees with you. But simply saying trade because his value is high now was what sparked the initial remark. (That wasn't me)
  13. The parallels are there. You cannot say what value Duran or Arraez is going to have next year or two years from now. Meh.
  14. He was responding to the Sell When High comment about Arraez. Duran's value is HIGH, therefore should we sell? The answer is No. But you DO, or would rather, sell when a players value is high (Arraez) vs low (Kepler). So selling Kepler after his 35+ HR season is better than this offseason since his batting has taken a nose dive.
  15. Instead of comparing Arraez to other .300 plus hitters over the years. But from an article by ESPN this past summer. You may have heard of this guy name Ichiro and as a Twins fan Carew is on your Mount Rushmore. "His biggest boosters include Twins legend Rod Carew, winner of seven batting titles, owner of a .328 lifetime average and, as Arraez recently learned, Suzuki, who copped to Arraez being his favorite left-handed hitter in baseball today. Neither Carew nor Suzuki lavishes praise willy-nilly. Their stamps of approval say as much as Arraez's numbers."
  16. This is better. But then again, I am not sold on Lopez. I know we have some FA pitchers after this year, but Lopez isn't moving the needle enough for me. He is like Gray. If he was a Gray++, siginficant upgrade then maybe.
  17. As far as I can tell, the FO is taking the right stance with Arraez. He is a keeper, unless we get some worth the value. The Twins turned down a 1:1 trade for Lopez, not the Marlins per Dan Hayes on The Athletic. But if the Marlins, (and they won't, or at least I wouldn't), bumped it to Alcantara, I am sure the Twins would include Arraez and +1 or +2. But not Lopez. And the FO is right to not give Arraez away. It is not always HRs that you need. If you need to bring home the runner from 3rd or 2nd, I want Arraez in the box and not Gallo.
  18. Interesting point. On one hand Cutch isn't the defender he once was and Gallo profiles better as a defender. On the other hand, Gallo is YALHOF, (Yet Another Left-Handed Outfielder) and the Twins are trying to corner the outfield market on LFOFs... LOL Don't think Cutch would have helped much, but still don't understand the Gallo signing really.
  19. AGAIN, I would not trade for a pitcher that is not a significant upgrade to Sonny Gray. The article itself is very good. I just don't understand this lack of confidence, or maybe it is simply years of having sub-par pitching, that so many people want to trade for anyone who is not going to be a significant upgrade. With not lockout, they HAVE to have an understanding where Maeda and Mahle stand in being ready for pitching in the spring. If not, they are not doing their job. Same is true to lesser degree with Gray and Ober. In addition, doubling down on Pagan as they did, they damn well better be in the loop on how he is progressing in eliminating the mistakes of 2022. To a lesser degree the same is true of Lopez. The FO is not dumb. You do not get to the point they are on any MLB team without knowing what you are doing to some degree.
  20. I knew they tried, but not how, to get him in better shape. Again, in the minors, he does not take a roster spot on the Twins. If he gets fixed, lottery long shot to be honest, then the Twins can decide WHAT to do. Keep him, trade him, etc... But if they unlock his full potential of his bat, I suspect 99.44% of this is in his head, then he is truly worth taking a minor league flyer on him. Note: This is not going to happen. I think the business side of the Twins are just going to let him go.
  21. also, I take exception to how this was worded: "His biggest long-term injury concern has become his lower leg, which was surgically repaired in 2014." It has never been an issue as a player in the Majors. Didn't this happen while he was in the minors? I think the issue with Carlos that should concern you was his back issues. But I think he addressed that with his conditioning and preparation.
  22. If Buxton is healthy enough to play 120-130 games the Twins run away with the Division. But this is rarified air, if not a unicorn. I am not a concerned about C4's health. Unless he gets plunked in the hand again. I think it would be great for the Twins and MLB in general if Buxton can stay healthy and produce for a full season along the numbers he has been teasing. What was it 4WAR in 50% of the games? 8 WAR and you are in the MVP conversation.
  23. This is the right position to take. First it is NOT about a fit for this team NOW. He has to earn it again. But as put here, a minor league deal. If they can right him then they can figure out where to slot him. I would assign him to St Paul if only because you can keep an eye on his progress and tantalize/motivate him with being so close physically to the majors. BUT and this is key to helping him succeed. Nutritionist dedicated to Sano. I know it cost but I think caring about your "family" and giving him all the help to succeed. Dedicated hitting coach as well, or at least one that is dedicated to helping Sano. With his power, if he dropped his SO rate to 30% or below, look out. I think he is salvageable. I really do. Surprisingly optimistic position for a Twins fan I know but blame my Mom. ;) The ultimate key is, does Sano Want It. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make the horse drink.
  24. They could produce a 10K game by themselves... LOL
×
×
  • Create New...