Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,296
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    337

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. If they trade a guy, or guys, with four or more years of control for a guy with two, I don't see how this is sustainable.. This signing only makes good sense if Kepler is dealt, at least for me. I guess it's possible they think both larnach and AK are too hurt to start the year, otherwise they are blocking at least one of them if Kepler is still here.
  2. Ryan, Ober, Varland not enough for you in a two year period? Add SWR at some point this year. How many are you expecting?
  3. You might have to search pretty hard to find that pitcher being available. Like, really, really, really hard.
  4. That's a pretty great outcome so far. If even one of AK or Larnach can stay healthy......I think there are at least three good RPs that haven't emerged yet either.
  5. Martinez is a DH only. I'm not sure I get the angst over this.
  6. Sure. He might be. He also might be the guy that hasn't played center for some reason..... Which is very different than a guy moving to first base. I agree, his defense is one reason he's in Minnesota. I don't understand how pointing out he hasn't played center is so bad..
  7. You're comparing a second year player transitioning to the least difficult position, to a long time veteran playing center?
  8. You keep arguing against the opposite of what I say. Over and over. You keep posting they should sign great players, then when I say that, you argue. I really don't get it.
  9. No. I want them to sign one elite player, not three bad ones. I want them to supplement the team with a great player, not put bad filler on the roster. Or, take a chance on a Bassitt type, because I'd rather take a chance on Bassitt and a rookie, over Haap and Shoemaker type.
  10. Then I don't get the AK question.
  11. They weren't desperate. They paid Turner, seager, money. That's the market.
  12. One elite player and two rookies, or three bad to risky players. Which is more likely to be helpful year after year?
  13. Sure. He could be great. For one year. Then what? Because all their young OF are now in the minors....
  14. How has signing bad players worked? Like Happ, Shoemaker, et. al.? That doesn't work either.
  15. Are you suggesting Gallo will play first?
  16. Who has a top end pitcher they don't want, but wants two older players?
  17. Actually, no. Nearly every one of them was better. Gordon was much better. Had Wallner been up all year, he'd have been twice as good.
  18. 40 home runs? How many players did that last year? Wow.
  19. I'd give up nothing to get a guy that you want Lewis to replace by June. Well, money. But not players.
×
×
  • Create New...