Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,924
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. A bit early, but fangraphs is suggesting it's part of an underslot ploy.
  2. Of course they say that now. He seems to be the kind of guy they pick a lot, but more athletic.
  3. Wow. Fangraphs thinks crews could be in the majors next year. That's fast. Had Skenes made the Twins, I'd think this year was possible
  4. Definitely the top guy on the board. With a draft this deep, just taking the top guy makes the most sense.
  5. Just take the most likely best player, thank you.
  6. I don't understand their unwillingness to move on from the two corner OFs at this point.
  7. It's not their job to only trade bad players. No one would ever trade with them again. The post said they should keep all the prospects until they were certain which were the good ones ... That's impossible, not even Tampa does that.
  8. No idea what that has to do with what I quoted. I've called for their heads, so I'm certainly not here to defend them.
  9. And then trade the bad ones? It doesn't work that way.
  10. Yup. I've pointed that out before. I agree, they are shorting themselves pool money, all to save a few hundred K in a league where teams flush millions every year.
  11. Good god. Miranda was a top prospect. At some point you have to trust them. This is a ridiculous article.
  12. Can't seem to clear this, so I'll just add that I vacuumed and didn't find anything going on, which I'm this case is likely good, unlike the FO fiddling while the season burns
  13. There is no evidence of that coming. I hope to be wrong.
  14. Ya. It's very consistently bad. But the FO is doing nothing about it, so we got that going for us.
  15. This just shows how deep this draft is...... And I'm less high on Lee than I have been. Fifth in his league among SS in hitting. I'm not seeing progress. I think any of the top 5 are higher than him. By top five I mean ranked in this draft, not your five projected picks. I agree with your overall ranking
  16. It only works if a great talent falls ...I think in the deepest draft in memory, you take the best players. We'll see soon....
  17. It should be. Their other locations are great....and this is only 3 blocks from my house. We are excited for good beer and pizza that close.
  18. OPS under .700 again.....a couple hot games do not offset 3+ bad years of data.
  19. Right, Polanco does not fix the offense, because he and Julien are nearly the same on offense. We were talking about offense...not sure how to make that more clear. If you want to fix the offense, then subbing Polanco for Julien does not do that. They need to fix 3B and all three OF spots (well, those are the spots most fixable anyway, no one expects to fix all three). No place did anyone anoint Julien a STAR. No place did anyone say he was an overall better player than Polanco.
×
×
  • Create New...