Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    48,303

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    337

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    Facts, what are they good for?
  2. Mike Sixel
    We really have nothing left to talk about?
  3. Mike Sixel
    Kepler over .300? I'll take the under.
  4. Mike Sixel
    I don't know..... Three years of Polanco (above average 2B signed to a good deal) Trade Kepler for a prospect in the 4-10 range for Boston. A guy that should fill the back of your rotation for 6 years (Varland). For one year of a player? Heck, they can likely deal Polanco for 2 good prospects if they really want. I'd do that if I'm Boston all day. Three years of Polanco and 6 of Varland is a lot of certainty compared to getting a couple highly rated prospects. That said, if Boston is punting the next couple years, I'd rather get Lee and Varland than Polanco and Varland. But I think people are over-estimating what you can get for 1 year of a player (unless you are dealing with a team that is certain to extend him, like SD or Seattle or NYY).
  5. Mike Sixel
    I don't think 11 MM is the issue, it's three years for a RP that was hurt the last two.
  6. Mike Sixel
    snowflakes? Ugh.
  7. Mike Sixel
    At this point? I probably go with the young guys. This roster isn't constructed to win it all, I don't think. May was well see what they have. Also, guys with options allow them to send guys up and down when there are issues, whereas these guys don't. But, if they sign a couple, I'm also ok with that.
  8. Mike Sixel
    A three year deal for a RP that was hurt the last two years is not a deal I'd make.....
  9. Mike Sixel
    You quoted my response to someone talking about Buxton. As for CC, they if they felt there was an issue, they likely didn't fear it given it was really a one year deal.
  10. Mike Sixel
    We are trading for one year of a player that they likely won't sign to a long term deal. Why?
  11. Mike Sixel
    Ok. But the post you responded to was about Buxton, so I'm not sure your point.
  12. Mike Sixel
    Bassit is the one I'd want from that list. I would have preferred one of last year's starters.....
  13. Mike Sixel
    What makes you think the Twins will pay that? And, it blocks Miranda and Lee.
  14. Mike Sixel
    Three or four years of Arraez, plus Kepler and a prospect for one of Devers? To what end? They won't pay him for an extension.
  15. Mike Sixel
    Buxton? That post is about Buxton.
  16. Mike Sixel
    Because he gets his clients big money? How?
  17. Mike Sixel
    Nothing.
  18. Mike Sixel
    100%
  19. Mike Sixel
    100%
  20. Mike Sixel
    And yet, it wasn't.
  21. Mike Sixel
    Except they won't pay Devers. Also, how do you get him without giving up Lee or Lewis, plus?
  22. Mike Sixel
    They didn't sign Rocker. They let DeGromm go. He's a free spender, but do we know he ignores medical advice? I have no idea at this point. I'm guessing a three year deal for 105....
  23. Mike Sixel
    Your narrative didn't cast the Twins in the worst light, sir.
  24. Mike Sixel
    Some people just have to assume the worst about the Twins, in every situation.
  25. Mike Sixel
    Why would they look foolish for backing out when two others did?
×
×
  • Create New...