Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

mikelink45

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    10,236

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by mikelink45

  1. mikelink45
    making the playoffs is not a really high standard
  2. mikelink45
    If he was Montas this would be a different conversation
  3. mikelink45
    Now we can see Pressly, Hendriks, and Rogers all closing! I am not looking forward to it. Imagine if we had all of them, Graterol (67 games), Chargois (10 - 6 3.73 and 1.6 WAR), and Zack Littell (10 - 2 3.73 1.2 WAR) could fill out the pen. Sometimes what you have is better than the shiny toys somewhere else.
  4. mikelink45
    In an era where the BP seems to be gaining more value than the rotation I am not on board with this trade. If Paddack was performing well I would be okay, but he has not. The Padres saw him as excess now that they have Manaea. We say that Rogers has only one year because we seem to accept that everyone will be gone at the end of arbitration, but that did not have to be true. Paddack is not a sure thing, Pagan is not a sure thing, the rotation might be better, but maybe Winder would have been just as good and the bullpen is now shifted to a chaos where no one is sure of their role. I see lots of positive responses, but I will be the curmudgeon in this discussion.
  5. mikelink45
    I like the idea of Contreras as a 4th OF, but he has a lot of obstacles with Celestino and Larnach well ahead of him. Cano is my biggest question mark. With all the BP intrigue it does not seem like the Twins are interested in him. He is getting too old to be a prospect - he needs a chance. The same is true with Mason.
  6. mikelink45
    I like this - you did a really nice job of grouping and ranking. The catcher position is now the weakest and the one with the most question marks. Your choice of putting them almost in the middle of the rankings was good. Your ranking of Paddack is the most questionable of all the names. I guess you are expecting the rookie to come back - I hope he does, but right now he ranks with Bundy and Archer.
  7. mikelink45
    The Olympics was as big a stage as you can get and I think it really prepared Ryan to be more than a normal rookie. Let's hope he continues to grow as a key part of the rotation.
  8. mikelink45
    Nice start for the Saints. I will be interested in how they use Winder because he would be better off starting in St Paul than rusting in the BP. I hope they are aggressive with him. Sands looks really good to start the season and he should be in line for a call up as the season progresses too.
  9. mikelink45
    I think you got all the questions right. Now we ask - are the expectations for this team a mirage or a miracle?
  10. mikelink45
    Okay - the only thing I can say is -I don't like it. We know what Rogers is and we need it. We don't know what Paddock will be and I am not sure we need it.
  11. mikelink45
    And what are the facts that you use to decide Urshela is a better fielder?
  12. mikelink45
    That's fine. Kiriloff at 1B, Kepler sitting - no problem.
  13. mikelink45
    We had that many starters because they weren't any good so I guess we might need that many again.
  14. mikelink45
    Check out his BR page
  15. mikelink45
    I will take your opinion, I do not know much about him or any of the other 15 coaches. What do they all do? Anyway Paddack was 4 - 5 4.73 era and 7 - 7 5.07 during Tingler's two years in SD. Wow.
  16. mikelink45
    Who is going to get high leverage? The BP was coming together, now we have confusion in both SP and RP - what did this solve? Did Rocco go to the FO and tell them that the pitchers that they signed stunk? This just pushed Winder further from the rotation and I would take him over any of these others. Fourth OF should be Larnach!
  17. mikelink45
    Well time to recalculate - the Rotation now has a proven leader, two good young pitchers and three reclamation projects. The BP has lost its predicted closer and best reliever in the trade - do we now go get another RP or are we promoting from within and will they be as good as Rogers. I do not see the Twins making the WS - sorry, but Paddock, Bundy, Archer do not make a championship rotation. I would have expected Kepler to be in the trade they just did, but I think the Padres value Paddock a lot less than the Twins do. I am fine if he is traded, but I want real value back. I am all in on the first three predictions.
  18. mikelink45
    Those RP better be ready and good - someone has to replace Taylor Rogers and that is a big hole in the BP. When Larnach was pulled many thought he was traded instead of Rooker, but I thought maybe they were going to make him the fourth OF and drop both Rooker and Garlick - I would like that and now Rooker is gone.
  19. mikelink45
    And the Padres fired him! We are full of reclamation projects already. The TWINS clinic is open send us all your pitchers who have lost velocity, gotten confused, been mediocre for a few years - we are ready and Dr Wes will fix them unless they are Perez, Albers, Gant, Shoemaker, Happ, Bailey...
  20. mikelink45
    Nice attitude. I like seeing the players believe.
  21. mikelink45
    Which is better - flexibility or quality? I am high on the quality scale! I like a Verlander who takes the game into his own hands instead of three or four okay pitchers all hoping to be good that day. Baseball is slipping into my rear view mirror with the changes it is making and I do not want to lose it.
  22. mikelink45
    For the sake of debate I would reverse all your takes - let's check in at the end of the season! Thanks for starting a good line of debates. I did enjoy reading the article and your takes.
  23. mikelink45
    I know we tie Donaldson to Correa, but I don't. For a year the Twins could have had them both. Our spending is not crazy wild. If they wanted to save money from Donaldson they should have signed a good pitcher. We could have had Garver, Donaldson, and Correa - now that would be fun.
  24. mikelink45
    By the way - Cueto was signed by the sox as a backup precaution. Smart move - no guaranteed spot, just another arm in the system.
  25. mikelink45
    I know it is a popular stance to always see the Twins in the best light, but Donaldson leaves Urshela in the dust. He is a place holder and that is fine. We dumped a salary and filled a void. That is as far as I can go until I see the season play out.
×
×
  • Create New...