Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Cory Engelhardt

Verified Member
  • Posts

    3,287
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    29

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Cory Engelhardt

  1. Agreed, I do hope the Twins pivot to a move like this if the trade market isn't where they can find a move. They have to go for it in this window somehow. The payroll, for many reasons, doesn't matter as much. But not adding talent to go for it right now in some form or fashion is not acceptable.
  2. He is only 28, which is good. And really, if he hadn't had those terrible seasons before last year, he would be getting a LOT more money. I'm not saying I think the Twins can get him. But I can absolutely understand the reasoning for spending free agent money on him compared to someone like Snell (for example.) I LOVE Snell, but that walk rate is hard to ignore.
  3. They do have 38 players on the 40 man, and that's before potentially trading any of their veterans that have been rumored. There will be more additions, guaranteed. I just don't what kind of additions :)
  4. If they were to get Bellinger, I'd have to imagine the relationship with Boras was helped by a number of things, including the Correa deal and even keeping Gallo on the roster as long as they did. He is an obvious positional fit, and I do agree that spending payroll money on position players (while trading for pitching) makes sense. I'm not certain it will happen, but put me in the camp that this would be a fantastic move. Even if he doesn't do what he did last season again, he would still be a great addition to our lineup.
  5. It’s hard to get worked up now when the offseason is nowhere close to over though right?
  6. My order of preference in terms of the deals would be... 1) Jeremy's deal 2) Jamie's deal 3) Theo's deal Luzardo and Meyer coming back would be electric. I'm not sure Seattle would trade Gilbert, and I'm not really too enamored with Theo's deal and how that would help in the 2024 season. Fun talker!
  7. Just off and on with kids and work and stuff. Hopefully they make a move asap :)
  8. I certainly hope not. :) I guess I would leave him in the role he is, but if this IS an option, he certainly has the arm talent to be good as a starter too right?
  9. I prefer to keep Vazquez. This move doesn't move the needle for me.
  10. I'm sorry, I can't put Severino above Woods Richardson. I just can't do it. I'd probably also, easily, have Danny De Andrade and Connor Prielipp (if his shoulder is healthy) and Pierson Ohl well above Severino too. And now that I think of it, possibly another 5 or 10 guys. Severino at 15 is probably 10 spots too high for him in my opinion.
  11. What is the difference in draft allotment money going from 71 to 38?
  12. Agreed. It would be nice to know what is going on, if something is going on still
  13. I read it as, Kirilloff’s pretty major surgery a few offseasons ago (the same one that Kirk Gibson had) COULD be an issue at some point again at any point in his career. That said, for right now today, I haven’t read anything to suggest it is an issue right now. If it is an issue right now, then getting a different full time 1b, or at least someone to platoon with Miranda, makes a world of sense. Maybe that’s Julien? Maybe that’s someone else. But IF Kirilloff is feeling ok, then he should perform, right?
  14. We will see if all of these guys are still on the roster in a month. But you are right, they will have a strong lineup.
  15. I’ll just add, I don’t want anything to do with Clevinger. I know he has Cleveland ties, but I don’t want his personality added to the twins clubhouse
  16. This makes me think, maybe the Twins will target someone who is closer to average in terms of extension to be able to build them up?
  17. Do you think Seattle would accept Royce for Gilbert? I’d imagine both fanbases would hate that move, which means it probably would be fair. I don’t see it happening, just curious. At least as the parameters of a deal, maybe not a 1 for 1
  18. I know Brock, you are great. Sorry for the snark. That said, I do watch mostly the Twins. That is why I probably undervalue our guys more than other team’s players, when comparing. Or at least that’s what I tend to do generally.
  19. Jamie, it was awesome. Thank you! Curious, is there a starter out there who doesn’t score well with this extension list/data that you like and/or think the Twins would target because they could improve that player’s extension?
  20. This would be outstanding. Do you think Seattle would trade him at all? I have my doubts, but would absolutely love to hear what it would take. If it wouldn’t include Royce or Jenkins, I’d be in
  21. I also like to rate my teams players worse because it’s the team I follow the closest
  22. I don’t know if ace level is the need, now or at the deadline. They should have a really strong bullpen regardless, and I think the need would be someone you can comfortably trust to start a playoff game. I’d prefer it now, because you never know who may or may not be available at the deadline with teams possibly still in playoff races. The pitching staff should be really good with the goal of having Varland be your 6th starter (I think they use 6 guys even to start the year, especially to help watch Paddack’s innings if everyone else is healthy) and that’s a really good thing.
×
×
  • Create New...