Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    40,844

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    463

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. ashbury
    I continue to believe what I did when Sano was stationed at third: he's a little shy of the ball. A terrible thing to have to say (especially with no expertise to back it up), and I don't mean it in some extreme way, but at third he almost always approached a hot grounder in a way that kept a little extra distance between himself and the ball, fielding with the glove outstretched rather than stepping toward the ball and being ready to block it with his body if need be. By contrast, he excelled at slow-rollers, which he could barehand and then rocket to first base - no chance of a bad hop leaving an owie. That play yesterday brought back those memories. I know those plays happen fast, but something doesn't look right, a lot of the time, and maybe a quality coach could tell me I'm imagining things. (I can't find the video that I saw yesterday, to double check my thoughts on this.)
  2. ashbury
    It's a sad case, because the player is seemingly angry at the organization, but honestly what else could the front office have done if he isn't breaking panes of glass with regularity? So they DFAed him (and he passed through waivers unclaimed) because he was out of minor league options. Humiliating, because this never happened to Clayton Kershaw, but it is what it is. This first game at AAA does nothing to deny that decision.
  3. ashbury
    Boston series so far: one step forward, two steps back.
  4. ashbury
    The primness about referring to the team the way it was named when he was with them, is a bit reminiscent of some people's discomfort with the name of the leagues Satchel Paige pitched in before the American League belatedly allowed him entry.
  5. ashbury
    Good game for Winder, and good games at the plate for Larnach and Arraez and Sano. The others.... not so much.
  6. ashbury
  7. ashbury
    I hate to see the word "tip" in a headline concerning pitchers. For that brief moment I thought I was about to learn our pitchers had developed a bad habit.
  8. ashbury
  9. ashbury
    If you mean his strikeoutitis is infectious, exposing him to other teams could be a smart strategy.
  10. ashbury
    False. In pure capitalism one is never paid more than one is worth. So... um, your point still stands.
  11. ashbury
    More than I'm earning, currently.
  12. ashbury
    Four dollars to watch either of those Dodger games? Sign me up! Wait, *I* have to pay *them*?
  13. ashbury
    Arguably the guy who came closest to 30/30 was Corey Koskie in 2001, 26/27. Torii did 29/23 one year. Players in the entire franchise history (1901 Senators and forward) have done even 15/15 just 21 times. The Yankees by contrast have 59 such player/seasons. Seven Twins players have managed 20/20.
  14. ashbury
    Didn't look like two WS teams though - not even a WS team vs a playoff hopeful. This was Dodgers against Pirates territory. And Kershaw doesn't throw perfectos every game - by some measure this might be his best game since 2016, and wouldn't you know it, it came against us. It's only two games, but (like in the season opener) we have good reason to reevaluate whether this is actually a strong offense at all. The league is full of future Hall of Famers and it can't be the excuse every time. When do our guys start imposing their will on other teams' good players for a change?
  15. ashbury
    Susana makes the most sense to me, if he literally can't be traded for a while. Also, if there is any contingency aspect to the eventual choice of player, today's start by Paddack serves to bump up the quality of our mystery player by some tiny increment.
  16. ashbury
    Bah.
  17. ashbury
    There's a good argument that a robo-ump will favor the hitter more than the pitcher. Hitting is about timing, pitching is about disrupting timing. Anything that decreases uncertainty in the batter's mind has to help lock in on the pitch - the category of pitch that's "too close to take with two strikes" will become smaller, for instance. So, the term "fairness" may be interpreted differently by a pitcher than by a batter.
  18. ashbury
    Both these principles coincide with what I understand, too. I just don't know quite for sure how they translate to the case of a trade, and likewise I don't recall such a case to use as a precedent. I trust that our FO will know, and not find themselves having to expose someone to waivers unexpectedly because the order of the steps has to be carried out some certain way.
  19. ashbury
    Also too, if the guy you trade for is on the 60-day IL, can you transfer him directly to yours, without first opening up a 40-man spot and then IL'ing him? I don't think so, but that's only from playing OOTP.
  20. ashbury
    I'm repeating myself to say that having a stud catcher is a rich team's luxury. It means all other needs are filled. I'm all for having a great catcher fall into my lap; but when consciously investing, such as an early first-round draft pick, I want a shortstop or a pitcher or a hard hitting center fielder. Second-rounders Ben Rortvedt and Ryan Jeffers are my idea of how to draft catching, if it's a priority.
  21. ashbury
    Haven't seen Paribus on the prospects lists - I'll keep an eye out. Thanks for the tip.
  22. ashbury
    Just so long as it's not Ted or Cliven/Ammon
  23. ashbury
    If we're going to discount Donaldson's accomplishment, it's only fair to point out that the inning was still alive and the bases were loaded for Sanchez because Kirilloff hit into an error instead of the third out.
  24. ashbury
    I think this b-r.com page shows the list of players born in a given year. The earliest year of birth I can find is 1832. https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/majors/1832-births.shtml Nate Berkenstock. Now there's a trivia answer to keep in the back of your mind for your next SABR convention. The 1871 National Association is generally accepted as the first season of major league baseball. The sport itself, of course, has no exact beginning date, and the taint of "professionalism" drifted in as soon as grown men started playing seriously. As for the New York Game article you referenced, you will never go wrong by reading what John Thorn writes.
  25. ashbury
    It bothered me too, but I refrained from highlighting my OCD tendency last night.
×
×
  • Create New...