Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

arby58

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,702

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by arby58

  1. arby58
    Leverage decreases as you approach the fulcrum. Every team will know that Gordon is out of options, so thinking you'll just wait until late in spring training to decide means you are left with the options of keeping him on the roster or waiving him. If there is something to get for him, you have to do it sooner rather than later.
  2. arby58
    It's still cute by half. You don't do this to players who performed well for you the prior year. It creates ill will you do not need with players you are going to need.
  3. arby58
    I don't understand the business logic of cutting loose a player who plays the same set of positions, is faster, better defensively, hits for more power, and had a far better year than Gordon last year. This strikes me as too cute by half.
  4. arby58
    The Twins have lots of players with positional flexibility. The issue is whether you need two 'Swiss Army Knife' players. If Gordon were particularly good at any one thing, maybe - but he's not particularly fast, doesn't have a strong arm, isn't going to hit for power, and was really poor offensively last year before he got hurt. I'm not seeing the case for him making a 26 man roster.
  5. arby58
    Gordon was hitting .176 with a .503 OPS through 91 at bats before the broken bone - it's not as if he was assured of a roster spot. Yes, he had a nice 2022, but he's got 696 career at bats, a .685 OPS and a 92 OPS+. I wouldn't expect much in return for him but agree they might as well see what they can get.
  6. arby58
    If you're going to include Julien, you need to include Lewis as well - IF he can stay healthy, he looks like the Twins number 3 hitter in the lineup, maybe until Jenkins displaces him.
  7. arby58
    If they keep Julien, they may as well trade Lee - only so much infield positions to go around, unless they decide to revisit the 'Lewis in centerfield' experiment. The advantages for Lee is he's a better defensive player (Julien's improvement notwithstanding), he's a switch hitter, and he's a couple years younger.
  8. arby58
    The only player here that would pique my interest as a GM is Rodriguez - the rest are marginal prospects/major leaguers. Miranda was hurt/ineffective last year, Larnach is a replacement player, WAR-wise. Winder, Moran, and Sands are probably the 12th or 13th pitcher on a MLB staff.
  9. arby58
    Add me to the chorus of 'why not Julien' from a trade chip perspective. On the plus side of value, he had a nice rookie year at the MLB level, so he jumps some of the players where it is conjecture as to whether they can hit MLB pitching. He also does well in the OBP area, and there is some pop to his bat. Plus, he's controllable. The downside is defense - and the Twins' log jam of players who might conceivably play 2B, which is still his natural position. That said, for a team looking for offense at that position, he should be plenty interesting as a trade chip. I would slot him at 6 as well.
  10. arby58
    They just added a power hitting bat who strikes out a lot in Yunior Severino. Yunior is younger and has put up far better numbers - and already reached Triple A this year. Severino yes, Sabato no.
  11. arby58
    The operative phrase being 'when they traded for him.' He was two years removed from being an All-Star, and the year before they traded for him he went 7-9 with a 4.19 ERA. Nobody was calling him an All-Star that year.
  12. arby58
    Martin did better at St. Paul second half of the year, but a AAA OPS under .800 doesn't scream ready for MLB. I wouldn't bet on him as the immediate answer - probably needs more time in St. Paul. Castro has looked decent in CF, although he significantly over-achieved his career averages last year. That could just be the fact that he's relatively young. I suppose between the three of them (including Buxton), you'd hope at least one pans out.
  13. arby58
    You're going to look for upside potential. Neither Lopez or Gray was an All-Star when they traded for them - although both were solid starting pitchers. Twins gave up a pitcher drafted in the high first round who threw 100 mph for Gray, which isn't chopped liver, but it isn't an All-Star position player either.IF you think Brooks Lee is ready and/or Polanco can play most days (and both are switch hitters), I'd bet Julien, who is sort of a young Arraez, could bring you back a (possible future All Star) pitcher with upside.
  14. arby58
    It costs a lot more to buy a free agent than to trade for one. Everybody here ignores the dollar side of the equation (related to a free agent), but it is real, and it limits what else the Twins can do. The Twins have been excellent at the trade approach to starting pitching, why change now?
  15. arby58
    I (barely) remember the days with Halsey Hall as the color commentator and Ray Scott doing play-by-play (and, of course, the Hamm's bear) on WTCN television.
  16. arby58
    Joe Ryan isn't a big problem, granted, but the question is whether you can rely on him in a really big game. Maybe the groin injury is the story of his second half of 2023, but it is telling that he has been trying to expand his pitch repertoire: the author is right, a starting pitcher throws a lot of pitches, so batters have a better opportunity to adjust, even if that one pitch is stellar. The key for Ryan is making one of those other pitches a plus pitch. If he can, maybe he could be more than a #3-ish starter. If not, it's highly doubtful.
  17. arby58
    Right - the Twins starters were near the top of MLB in average innings pitched per start in 2023. It's not that hard to look this stuff up.
  18. arby58
    I would rate that highly unlikely. They both performed better than their salaries last year. Polanco is under team control at a very reasonable salary for two years, and Kepler also plays good defense. If nothing else, they both should be tradeable for something, rather than just letting them go somewhere else for nothing.
  19. arby58
    Sonny Gray had a great year, but he is a reason they are now sitting at home - it was a 1-1 series after the big Lopez win, back at home, and he gave up 5 runs in 4 innings.
  20. arby58
    Festa is not established, why would a team trade an established MLB starting pitcher with multiple years of control for him? Besides, a team trading starting pitching is generally not looking for it back, they would have other needs. Maybe they need an outfielder, and Kepler/Wallner, Larnach makes it happen (although I wouldn't give up both Wallner and Fiesta unless it was a really solid starting pitcher).
  21. arby58
    For me, it also explains why analytics are useful. I guess it's one of those glass half full/half empty, and your mileage may vary discussions.
  22. arby58
    Castro had a nice year, 2.6 WAR and an exciting, impactful player. That said, he's had 1,365 at bats and produced a career WAR of 3.0. If I'm the Mariners (or any other team), I have to wonder if 2023 was an aberration. Otherwise, why not trot out Nick Gordon? He had a great second half of 2021 ala Castro. If I'm the Mariners, and I'm giving up a front line starting pitcher, the ask is Julien, not Castro.
  23. arby58
    I get that Farmer might be of interest to a team without a viable shortstop, but otherwise he's just a serviceable utility player - nothing wrong with that, but it's not going to bring you much more than that in return. Larnach will be 27 before the start of spring training and is starting to look like a player with a great future behind him. Polanco has injury concerns. I don't see a significant return for any of them, but Polanco should bring you at least a decent prospect, and he does have two years of control. I'd say Kepler would be more viable as a trade chip, as he is durable and a decent defensive outfielder - but he only has one year of team control. I doubt any of them yields a big return. I'd bet you could get something tangible for Julien - pretty impressive rookie year. He may be a variation on the Arraez theme, as he's not great defensively, not great speed for a lead-off hitter, but he gets on base and has a little more pop to make up for more strike-outs and less average. If you could get a front line starter for him, sure - IF you believe Lee is ready and/or Polanco will be reasonably healthy.
  24. arby58
    Here are the home runs by team/games played. There is a clear trend here: Phillies 24/13 = 1.84 per game Rangers 22/12 = 1.83 per game Astros 20/11 = 1.81 per game Diamondbacks 18/12 = 1.5 per game Twins 7/6 = 1.16 per game Orioles 3/3 = 1.00 per game Braves 3/4 = 0.75 per game Brewers 1/2 = 0.50 per game Dodgers 1/3 = 0.33 per game Blue Jays 0/2 = 0.00 per game Marlins 0/2 = 0.00 per game Rays = 0/2 = 0.00 per game
  25. arby58
    Reminds me of what was arguably the greatest World Series ever - 1991 Twins versus Braves. Both those teams were last place teams the year before, with the Twins going 74-88 and the Braves 65-97. In 1991, the Twins went 95-67 (an improvement of 21 wins) and the Braves went 94-68 (an improvement of 29 wins).
×
×
  • Create New...