Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Trade Retrospective: Mitch Garver World Series Edition


    Nate Palmer

    Former Minnesota Twin Mitch Garver just won the World Series with the Texas Rangers. Let's take a look back at how the move to trade him has aged since it happened a couple offseasons ago. 

    Image courtesy of Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    As the baseball world was treated to a Texas Rangers World Series championship, Minnesota Twins fans watched former Twin and fan favorite Mitch Garver perform well throughout the playoffs. His highlights included a golf-shot home run off of Merrill Kelly in Game 2 and an RBI single to break open the scoring in the title-clinching game. With the Rangers' incredible run fresh in mind, let’s take a trip back to examine the trade that landed Garver in Texas. 

    The trade followed a 2021 season with the Twins where Garver had played in only 68 games but hit for an .875 OPS and 139 OPS+ in those limited plate appearances. That left the front office with a decision to make. Could they rely on the often-injured Garver, was it time to hand the reins to the rising Ryan Jeffers? Or, could they both share the catching load? 

    With other needs to fill on the roster, the decision ultimately was made to trade Garver away. A deal with the Rangers materialized and resulted in Garver leaving with Ronny Henriquez and Isiah Kiner-Falefa coming to Minnesota. This trade will always be challenging to analyze on its own because it set off a string of moves, which included trading away Josh Donaldson and eventually signing Carlos Correa. 

    The Immediate Move
    Based on the holes on the Twins roster at the time, it was understood that either Garver or Jeffers could be traded at some point in the 2021-2022 offseason. The return of Henriquez and Kiner-Falefa did feel light for what fans had hoped to see in a return for Garver. 

    Kiner-Falefa was an example of the front office setting a floor at an empty position. His bat has never been that impactful, boasting a meager 84 and 78 OPS+ over the past two seasons. What IKF does provide is above-average defense across the infield and, most notably, at shortstop, which was a hole on the roster heading into the 2021-2022 offseason. 

    There is still a chance that Henriquez will turn into a bullpen arm for the Twins. He came to the organization as a potential starter but, due to his struggle to stay healthy, has shifted primarily to the bullpen. While there is still a chance for Henriquez to impact the Twins roster, he will need to rise the ranks to meet the value of Garver when the two are placed side by side. 

    The Long-Term Ripple Effects
    The positive of this move comes from the chain reaction it set off. The trade allowed the Twins to send out Josh Donaldson, his contract, and his negative clubhouse presence to the Yankees, who were keen on acquiring Kiner-Falefa. Donaldson’s absence opened up payroll space to bring in Carlos Correa for his initial deal, paving the way for this year's long-term contract.

    Garver has also seemingly had the judgment passed on him that between injuries and performance, others should be playing catcher over him. The Twins did pass on Garver in favor of Jeffers, and the Rangers chose Jonah Heim and trade deadline acquisition Austin Hedges behind the plate. While they were two of the three best defensive catchers in the game, according to Baseball Savant, it is still worth noting that the Rangers saw a need to acquire Hedges when Garver was in the locker room. 

    Even as just a right-handed bat, Garver could have helped the Twins, especially considering his .938 OPS against left-handed pitchers in 2023. The only issue would be roster space and playing time. The Twins are currently seeing a roster crunch when all players are available at designated hitter (and corner positions if he was willing to play first base), and Garver would only add to that crunch. 

    In the end, the initial deal looked like a short-sighted one. Thankfully for the Twins and us as fans, the Yankees were desperate to grab IKF and created all those other moves. Moves that, in ways, laid the groundwork for 2023 and beyond. Now, Garver will hit the free agent market, and we will see if everyone views him simply as a designated hitter or if someone will give him a chance to catch again. 

    How did watching Garver win a championship with another team sit with you? How do you feel about the trade a couple of years later? Let us know below!

     

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    It feel like Garver has been what he always was with the Twins.  As a catcher always hurt, but when healthy one of the better bats in baseball.

    The Twins needed to solve their shortstop situation and as mentioned if they didn't trade Garver they don't get Correa.  With that in mind I think the Twins win that trade.  If you want to evaluate just on the pieces they received then I feel like they got taken.  Garver has a power bat and was likely to outperform both players whether he remained at catcher or not.  Henriquez has been a disaster to this point.  No longer being a starter really makes that trade look weak on a player for player(s) level. 

    Given that in the end they better balanced the roster I will give the edge to the Twins.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I always thought the Garver trade was a little off, as decent catchers are such a valued commodity and the return for him was relatively light at the time..  But that move led to other moves that led to Correa and others.  I am not going to lament over that move.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I miss Garver and I do not think we can make all the connect a dots that link it to getting rid of Donaldson.  There were other ways to do that.  I am happy for him and now he will be with????  

    The Twins are fine, I just do not want to overstate the success of the trade since I do not think it was a success. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The initial trade was terrible.  A move of desperation to fix the SS position.  The following moves made the trade worthwhile.  I would rather have Correa on the team over Garver.  I’m glad Garver has had success.  I wonder if we could end up signing him to be a 1B/ DH/ and 3rd C to cut into Vazquez time if he refuses to hit at all next season.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Signing Donaldson was a huge mistake and set in motion a series of unfavorable events. Since we’ve been looking for a good right handed hitter since he left the Garver trade has been a disaster. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I loathed the Garver trade for a week. I couldn't have possibly disliked Kiner-Falafa more, they had JUST ended the Andrelton Simmons experiment and you'd think they'd have known not to go back to that well.

    But by the time they cleared Donaldson's salary and signed Correa, I loved it. However, I'm still not convinced they knew they'd be able to pull that off, or had even considered it when they traded Garver. So hard to give too many pats on the back, but whether it was skillful or just serendipity, it worked out well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, nicksaviking said:

    I loathed the Garver trade for a week. I couldn't have possibly disliked Kiner-Falafa more, they had JUST ended the Andrelton Simmons experiment and you'd think they'd have known not to go back to that well.

    But by the time they cleared Donaldson's salary and signed Correa, I loved it. However, I'm still not convinced they knew they'd be able to pull that off, or had even considered it when they traded Garver. So hard to give too many pats on the back, but whether it was skillful or just serendipity, it worked out well.

    The Donaldson and Simmons et al era really cemented something very important for the current squad.  Team matters, character matters, working together matters.  Correa drives culture and I would be very surprised if they intentionally brought in one of these disruptive type forces again. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There's a lot to like about this year's Twins roster of course, but the OP touches on an aspect that seems like the Bad Old Days during Terry Ryan's second reign, and that is the "and if nothing else, he can DH" mantra.  That philosophy if not kept in check can lead in games against NL teams to Josh Willingham playing left and Ryan Doumit playing right field, and I use that verb advisedly in both instances.

    Those old rosters had hardening of the arteries, and unfortunately having Mitch Garver here in 2023 or going forward would feed into that.  Not his fault, just not a good fit.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I may be one of the few that liked that trade at the time. Kiner-Falefa had played well with the Rangers and I thought he'd be a good fit for the Twins. Well, we never got to find out. Despite his injuries, Garver has hit well, although his frequent stints on the IL are still a concern. In any case, after we flipped Kiner-Falefa and Rorvedt to the Yankees for Urshela and Sanchez I wondered what the Twins were doing. Gary Sanchez? But of course the Correa option soon presented itself, so like others have said, it ended up working out well for the Twins. But I have to say, Garver has continued to hit better than I thought he would. My guess it that he will do well in free agency this year. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, Dman said:

    It feel like Garver has been what he always was with the Twins.  As a catcher always hurt, but when healthy one of the better bats in baseball.

    The Twins needed to solve their shortstop situation and as mentioned if they didn't trade Garver they don't get Correa.  With that in mind I think the Twins win that trade.  If you want to evaluate just on the pieces they received then I feel like they got taken.  Garver has a power bat and was likely to outperform both players whether he remained at catcher or not.  Henriquez has been a disaster to this point.  No longer being a starter really makes that trade look weak on a player for player(s) level. 

    Given that in the end they better balanced the roster I will give the edge to the Twins.

    if they didn't trade Garver they don't get Correa. 

    Is that supposed to be justification for trading Garver? I'd rather have a Jeffery/Garver catching duo, Lewis or Lee at shortstop and 36 million in the kitty to use next year .. Damn that trade ...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am a Garver fan and was happy for Mitch that he got to play and contribute in the WS.  I believe he is a FA.  It will be interesting to see what he gets on his next contract and where he ends up.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 11/13/2023 at 9:18 AM, saviking said:

    Is that supposed to be justification for trading Garver? I'd rather have a Jeffery/Garver catching duo, Lewis or Lee at shortstop and 36 million in the kitty to use next year .. Damn that trade .

    My initial thoughts as well. Give the young talent a shot & spend the money on pitching. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...