Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Minnesota Twins Trade Deadline Predictions


    Andrew Thares

    With the trade deadline just a week away, the Minnesota Twins still have yet to make a move, despite the large number of players they have who could potentially be traded. The next week is one that is sure to be filled with a ton of action for Twins fans, as the team looks to add more pieces to an exciting farm system. In this article I will attempt to predict which Twins players will be traded and to which teams I think they will be traded to.

    Image courtesy of © Dan Hamilton-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Brian Dozier

    Prediction – Traded to the Milwaukee Brewers

    Brian Dozier has started to heat up at just the right time and as a result has brought back some of his trade value. While there have been a number of teams with reported interest in Dozier, there have been none more so than the Milwaukee Brewers. At second base, the Brewers only decent option this year has been Jonathan Villar, who was recently placed on the disabled list with a right thumb sprain. However, even when healthy, Dozier is a considerable upgrade over Villar for Milwaukee.

    Outside of Corbin Burns and Freddy Peralta, who will most likely not be made available in a trade for Dozier, the Brewers lack the quality pitching prospects that would intrigue the Twins. One Brewers prospect that piques my interest is outfielder Corey Ray who has showing impressive feats of power and speed, hitting 19 home runs and stealing 30 bases in Double-A this season and is currently ranked as the 5th best prospect in the Brewers system according to Baseball America.

    Eduardo Escobar

     

    Prediction – Traded to the Philadelphia Phillies

    One of the few Twins players who has actually improved his trade value this season has been Eduardo Escobar. Last week, I wrote about him being the best available shortstop on the trade market after the Manny Machado trade. While third base is clearly his better position, I see a team in need of help at shortstop needing him the most.

    What makes the Philadelphia Phillies the perfect fit for Escobar is their need for improvement at both shortstop and third base. Escobar’s flexibility to play both positions will serve the Phillies well as they look to play around with their lineup down the stretch.

    Fernando Rodney

     

    Prediction – Traded to the Philadelphia Phillies

    As is always the case, nearly every team that is in playoff contention this time of year is looking to add another bullpen arm or two that they can rely on during a postseason run. While many of these teams might not be looking at Rodney to be their closer, he could still be a valuable weapon in the back-end of a contending team’s bullpen.

    One likely candidate that I think Rodney would fit well on is the Philadelphia Phillies. The back-end of their bullpen has been a revolving door all season, and right now they have just three guys in Seranthony Dominguez, Victor Arano and Edubray Ramos that they can count on in high leverage situations during the postseason. Not only would Rodney add depth to that bullpen, but he could be a much needed veteran presence as the average age of those three is just shy of 24. Additionally, Rodney would make a great add-on piece to trade with Eduardo Escobar to try to get a higher quality prospect back in.

    Kyle Gibson

     

    Prediction – Not Traded

    As much as I would like to see Kyle Gibson get traded before the deadline, I have a feeling that the Twins are going stay put with Gibson for now and look forward to 2019. Given the current trade market for starting pitchers, Gibson would be an ideal player for many teams to target. However, there hasn’t been much in the way of rumors surrounding Gibson, and with the plethora of players on expiring contracts for the Twins front office to focus on, I could easily see the Twins deciding to focus their attention elsewhere unless they receive a really strong offer.

    Ryan Pressly

     

    Prediction – Not Traded

    Last week over at Baseball Prospectus, Matthew Trueblood wrote an interesting article about the trade value of Ryan Pressly, and how he might be one of the most valuable relief options on the market. Much like Kyle Gibson, Pressly is still under control through 2019 which gives added interest for opposing teams to make a trade for him. That being said, I see the Twins taking the same approach with Pressly as they will with Gibson and deciding to look towards 2019, even if I would personally prefer them to try to trade Pressly.

    Zach Duke

     

    Prediction – Traded to the Boston Red Sox

    Zach Duke has been a sneaky good signing for the Twins this offseason. He has had a couple rough outings of late which have ballooned his ERA up to a still respectable 3.75, but his FIP remains nearly a full run lower at 2.77. Additionally, the Statcast metrics love Duke even more as he has the best expected wOBA (xwOBA) of any Twins pitcher at .263 (minimum 100 batters faced).

    There are a number of teams who could use a left-handed reliever and one in particular that sticks out is the Boston Red Sox. Right now, the Red Sox only left-handed option out of the pen is Brain Johnson, who has a 5.10 ERA in 30 innings pitched this season. Zach Duke would serve as a considerable upgrade over Johnson in Boston.

    Lance Lynn

     

    Prediction – Traded to the Oakland Athletics in August

    Lance Lynn is a tricky case. He has been nothing but downright bad this season (5.23 ERA in 96 1/3 innings), and wasn’t exactly highly sought after this past winter, leading the Twins to take a 1-year $12 million flyer on him. I struggle to find a team in contention where Lynn would be a good fit, but one team that could make sense is the Oakland Athletics. With their surge over the past month, the A’s are just 2.5 games back in the AL Wild Card race (entering play on Tuesday).

    The A’s could view Lynn as a potential flyer to see if he could return to his old form. If nothing else he could be an innings eater for them down the stretch, which is something they desperately need as they have just two starters who have thrown more than 62 1/3 innings this season. If the Twins are able to trade Lynn, I think they will most likely have to eat some, if not all of the roughly $4 million still owed to him.

    Logan Morrison

     

    Prediction – Not Traded

    When it comes to disappointing seasons, Logan Morrison’s has been on par with Lance Lynn’s. As a 1B/DH type who doesn’t provide much defensive value when playing first, Morrison’s worth relies almost entirely on his bat. Unfortunately for the Twins, Morrison has been one of the worst hitters on the team with a slash line of just .195/.288/.375 and 12 home runs (81 wRC+). At this point it is hard to see a contending team even wanting Morrison on their team to come off the bench.

    Ervin Santana

     

    Prediction – Not Traded

    Ervin Santana is finally set to make his season debut on Wednesday afternoon against the Toronto Blue Jays. With just a week left before the non-waiver deadline on July 31st, Santana won’t have enough time to prove that he is back and ready to pitch for a contender. If there is any chance of the Twins trading Santana at all, it will have to come in August before the wavier deadline. Fortunately for the Twins, Santana should easily pass through waivers, given his contract, and will become open to being traded to any team before the end of August. Whether or not Santana gets traded will come down to how well he pitches over the next month. Given the way he has been pitching during his rehab assignment that will be a tough hill to climb.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Why don't they just sign him as a free agent then? An extension likely isn't going to cost any less than a new deal in free agency and you can't force a player to sign an extension, why would he want to now?

     

    Get more assets now while we can.

     

    Why don't they just sign him as a free agent then? An extension likely isn't going to cost any less than a new deal in free agency and you can't force a player to sign an extension, why would he want to now?

     

    Get more assets now while we can.

    Why would he want to, certainty.  Knowing he is earning $x for the next several years in a place he apparently likes gives him peace of mind and security.  Will an extension be less or more costly, no one will ever know.  You are right, we can't force him to sign, but he just might...if asked.  

     

    On the flip side, once he is gone no one knows what will happen.  I value him too much to not, 1) not trade him; and 2) want to take a shot at locking him up in early August.  On the other hand, if someone gives the Twins a too good to say no offer, you have to take it.

     

     

    Why would he want to, certainty.  Knowing he is earning $x for the next several years in a place he apparently likes gives him peace of mind and security.  Will an extension be less or more costly, no one will ever know.  You are right, we can't force him to sign, but he just might...if asked.  

     

    On the flip side, once he is gone no one knows what will happen.  I value him too much to not, 1) not trade him; and 2) want to take a shot at locking him up in early August.  On the other hand, if someone gives the Twins a too good to say no offer, you have to take it.

     

    No one knows what will happen if he stays, either.

     

     

     

    I'll guess that Duke and Lynn get dealt for very underwhelming returns. Everybody else stays.

     

    Dealing Duke and Lynn would also give them a chance to check out some of the pitchers in AAA. Thats what they need to be focused on!!!

    I'm fine with all those predictions except Escobar. Losing Dozier would be fine because they've got Nick Gordon waiting in the wings. Who would replace Escobar? I'm against trading players unless you've got a replacement ready. Don't trade just because you're out of contention and that's what you're supposed to do.

     

    The risk is overpaying to keep the status quo, which clearly isn't working, intact.

     

    Overpaying for Dozier (my guess as to which one would get it if only one were to) would give "well, we paid Brian, now we need the young guys to step up more" excuse to fall back on.

     

    Enough "bad signings" (Morrison, Lynn, the hypothetical overpaying of Dozier/Escobar) and the purse strings will tighten back up if there's no on-field results.

     

    You were concerned that $17M was too much of a risk, not resigning the players. Payroll isn't going to be an issue, they could overpay Dozier or Escobar for one year or sign Eduardo Nunez for $4M or give Neil Walker a minor league deal and they'll be in the exact same situation, that being a veteran on a one year deal. They should be choosing who'd they like best and get that person, salary be damned as it's not going to be a factor in 2019.

     

    There are no such thing as tight purse strings with a $45M payroll.

     

    Time to move on - move all of these players if possible.  Too bad Reed is injured or I would move him too.  Maybe even MOTTER!  Does anyone want Grossman?  Does Cave look good enough to flip him?  Clean house.  Bobby Wilson?  I know, we are so bad that some of these players can't be given away.  But we have a new crop coming and new hope.  

     

    I'd keep Reed, injured or no. Motter might be a throw-in, I guess? No one wants Grossman, he's a marginal player. Cave is no more than a throw-in at this point. Bobby Wilson would only be attractive to a team that had a sudden injury and nothing in the minors. We're not really going to change anything by flipping any of those guys.

     

    Dozier, Escobar, Lynn, Mauer (if we're willing to eat contract), Gibson, maybe Santana, Pressly (who i would probably keep), Rodney, Duke...these are the assets that will get consideration and conversation. How many get moved?

     

    I'm betting Duke, either Dozier or Escobar (just have a hunch both don't get moved), and Lynn (with the Twins eating a little salary).

     

    My only prediction is there will be fewer moves than everyone anticipates.

     

    If it was me calling the shots, I'd probably try to move even more than the five guys you've predicted are going to get traded. This organization has never committed to a fire sale/tear down/rebuild, so I'm not going to hold my breath.

     

    I'll guess that Duke and Lynn get dealt for very underwhelming returns. Everybody else stays.

    The tear down was when they traded for Meyer and May, and the complete rebuild followed. Sano and Buxton crapped the bed, they didn't die. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water.

     

    The risk is overpaying to keep the status quo, which clearly isn't working, intact.

     

    Overpaying for Dozier (my guess as to which one would get it if only one were to) would give "well, we paid Brian, now we need the young guys to step up more" excuse to fall back on.

     

    Enough "bad signings" (Morrison, Lynn, the hypothetical overpaying of Dozier/Escobar) and the purse strings will tighten back up if there's no on-field results.

     

    If they don't trade them, I'd absolutely offer one of the 2 a QO.  There is very little risk involved.

     

    If you give Dozier a QO, he is not going to take it at all.  I guarentee he could absolutely get a 3/40 contract from someone and I don't see any way he accepts the QO.

     

    A QO for Escobar, would be overpaying.  I still think its a better than 50% chance he doesn't accept it and goes for a multi-year deal.  Your risk is that he accepts it, but even if he does, what is the big deal?  In a perfect world next year, Gordon, Polanco and Sano man 2B, SS and 3B next year.  If they all stay healthy, well, you just paid your utility infielder $17 million, but you also probably had a pretty good season, so who cares.  In reality, those guys probably won't all stay healthy and have great years.  History has shown that Escobar is probably going to play 120 games a year, so he's more than a typically utility infielder.

     

    I'm fine with all those predictions except Escobar. Losing Dozier would be fine because they've got Nick Gordon waiting in the wings. Who would replace Escobar? I'm against trading players unless you've got a replacement ready. Don't trade just because you're out of contention and that's what you're supposed to do.

     

    Your post makes sense if Escobar was not a free agent this year.  They might lose him anyway, so why not trade him.  Honestly, if you do trade him, you just let Sano sink or swim the rest of the season.  If Sano gets hurt, its Adrianza, Astudillo, Motter, Petit or whoever.  None of those guys are in the plans as a regular for 2019, but maybe Escobar isn't either, so who really cares.

     

    Also, if you trade him, it doesn't eliminate the possibility of signing him in the offseason.

     

    The tear down was when they traded for Meyer and May, and the complete rebuild followed. Sano and Buxton crapped the bed, they didn't die. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water.

    They also signed Kevin Correia and Mike Pelfrey that offseason. I'm not so sure I'd classify that as an attempt at a complete rebuild. The weighted averages for both their hitters and pitchers were right around league average in 2013.

     

    The last time this franchise truly committed to a youth movement was 1999. That team sucked, but it was damn fun to watch and that investment in the young talent paid off in the long run. I'm not necessarily saying it's time to burn things to the ground to that level, but it'd be nice to see them really commit to a direction one way or the other.

    Its probably also time to jump into the Yankees/Red Sox arms race.

     

    Yankees got a reliever.

    Red Sox got a starter.

     

    Time to get serious with the Yankees about Lynn, Odorizzi or Gibson.

    Time to get serious with the Red Sox about Rodney, Duke and even Dozier.

     

    Keep working with the Brewers about Dozier and Escobar.

    Talk to the Phillies about whoever.

    Talk to the A's about whoever.

     

    Try to pry a pitcher from the Yankees, or what about Thairo Estrada (2B/SS buried behind Torres and Gregorius)

     

    I just read that the Red Sox are looking for a veteran reliever, maybe a 3B upgrade and questions about Pedroia coming back.  What if the Twins offered Escobar, Dozier, Duke and Pressley?  Would the Red Sox like that and what would they give up?  Escobar would be a termporary upgrade over Devers, Dozier is Pedroia insurance and the bullpen guys are nice.

     

     

    Yep I see 2020 as the beginning of our next wave of talent.  Kirilof, Lewis, Graterol, and others should be ready or very close to ready by that time.  Our time is coming soon.  Not that they can't be good next year it is just that more reinforcements will be ready by 2020.  Just have to hope our competition doesn't build a better team before we do.

     

    Replace the names you had there with Sano, Buxton, Berrios and Kepler and you have what they fed to us a few years back. I don't trust that this next "wave" will be all that you are thinking they are. Are some of them going to pan out? Yep, they will. Will more of them fail than pan out? Yep. I think it needs to be a measured approach. Dumping anyone that is under team control right now looking forward to 2020 or beyond I think is a mistake. If they think they have a team that will be ready to rock in 2020 or so, they should be looking to build a team that is ready for 1 or 2 of those stud prospects to contribute to. Remember, Buxton and Sano still have plenty of potential and if they come back and do what we were all told they were capable of, this team can be pretty good. 

     

    You also have a pretty nice starting staff right now with a guy like Romero waiting to do his thing. A guy like Gibson or Pressly can be a part of any team that looks to contend in 2020.

    Edited by Battle ur tail off

     

    Replace the names you had there with Sano, Buxton, Berrios and Kepler and you have what they fed to us a few years back. I don't trust that this next "wave" will be all that you are thinking they are. Are some of them going to pan out? Yep, they will. Will more of them fail than pan out? Yep. I think it needs to be a measured approach. Dumping anyone that is under team control right now looking forward to 2020 or beyond I think is a mistake. If they think they have a team that will be ready to rock in 2020 or so, they should be looking to build a team that is ready for 1 or 2 of those stud prospects to contribute to. Remember, Buxton and Sano still have plenty of potential and if they come back and do what we were all told they were capable of, this team can be pretty good. 

     

    You also have a pretty nice starting staff right now with a guy like Romero waiting to do his thing. A guy like Gibson or Pressly can be a part of any team that looks to contend in 2020.

     

    You bet that is beauty of the next wave.  We can keep and maybe try to extend the players that we know are good and trade those we feel we can replace with younger options.  Or trade from our prospect surplus for known major league players.  We should just be in better position to plug holes than we are right now.  if Buxton and Sano return to decent players next year this team will already be much more dangerous.

     

    No need to blow this team up but get value where you can right now because this season is pretty much over.

    If I were the general manager of any other team in MLB, I wouldn't bother with any of the Twins you have named as possible tradees except Escobar and Gibson. And I wouldn't trade either of them if I were the Twins because as a fan, they're two of my favorites. Yeah, I know, that doesn't cut anything on the trade market but if you don't have a few guys you favor, what's the sense of rooting for a team? I like Rosario and Mauer, too, Berrios of course, but as for the rest I wouldn't miss any.

    Trading Escobar reminds me of trading Eduardo Nunez, a versatile, glue-like guy who can play infield or outfield. I liked him, too. I like guys who put out each time they play.

    I like Bobby Wilson for the same reason. 

    While it’s been well reported that the Dodger’s are looking for a high leverage reliever to be the bridge to Kenley Jansen, some are also saying they could really use another reliable and durable starter without injury concerns, unlike Clayton Kershaw, Alex Wood, and Rich Hill (maybe their entire rotation).

     

    That being said, I believe the FO should be actively pursuing a deal with LA, sending Pressly and Gibson for Keibert Ruiz.

     

     

    The Twins would have to get quite the return if they're going to trade both players.

     

    I'd hate to see Gibson go because he's the clear #2 for this team right now and ideally would be a great #3-4 on a contending Twins team next year. 

     

    But if they don't feel the team will have the pieces to win it all next year and can get a haul for Gibson + now, I guess it's a no-brainer.

     

     

    The Twins would have to get quite the return if they're going to trade both players.

     

    Considering the Brewers are supposedly in on Dozier and Escobar, I'd hope they could walk away with a higher ceiling guy like Peralta, especially if they are talking Gibson too.... They would have send out several top 10 guys plus some lower ranked upside guys for those 3.  

     

    Looking at their system, Jake Nottingham looks somewhat interesting, though he's in the majors now. He wasn't ranked that high, but could fill a major need.

     

    Your post makes sense if Escobar was not a free agent this year.  They might lose him anyway, so why not trade him.  Honestly, if you do trade him, you just let Sano sink or swim the rest of the season.  If Sano gets hurt, its Adrianza, Astudillo, Motter, Petit or whoever.  None of those guys are in the plans as a regular for 2019, but maybe Escobar isn't either, so who really cares.

     

    Also, if you trade him, it doesn't eliminate the possibility of signing him in the offseason.

     

    I'd rather keep Escobar and qualify him if the return is a marginal prospect or two.

     

    Clubhouse presence is often overblown, but I don't think it is in his case. The great Twins teams were known for their good chemistry. He adds a lot of versatility to the team as well.

     

    In the end you end up with a premium pick or another year of Escobar on a team that has another chance.

     

    What are the odds that the system's greatest needs, whatever they might be, will be met by trading him? I'd say slim.

     

    Better chance to address that with a top 100 pick next June.

    Edited by Monkeypaws

     

    They also signed Kevin Correia and Mike Pelfrey that offseason. I'm not so sure I'd classify that as an attempt at a complete rebuild. The weighted averages for both their hitters and pitchers were right around league average in 2013.

     

    The last time this franchise truly committed to a youth movement was 1999. That team sucked, but it was damn fun to watch and that investment in the young talent paid off in the long run. I'm not necessarily saying it's time to burn things to the ground to that level, but it'd be nice to see them really commit to a direction one way or the other.

    This... Absolutely this! 

     

    I'd rather keep Escobar and qualify him if the return is a marginal prospect or two.

     

    Clubhouse presence is often overblown, but I don't think it is in his case. The great Twins teams were known for their good chemistry. He adds a lot of versatility to the team as well.

     

    In the end you end up with a premium pick or another year of Escobar on a team that has another chance.

     

    What are the odds that the system's greatest needs, whatever they might be, will be met by trading him? I'd say slim.

     

    Better chance to address that with a top 100 pick next June.

     

    I'd be A-ok with that plan.  However, if he were thrown in to a bigger deal to pull in a bigger prospect, I'm A-ok with that too.

     

    There is no way Dozier goes to the Brewers. I don't get the daydreaming on this board. He is having an awful year.

     

    Right now on Trade rumors they are saying 6 teams are interested in Moustakas.  You look at his and Doziers career stats and they are very close to the same.  Even this year their stats are fairly close but with Dozier having a down first half Moustakas is better so far.  The thing is it is pretty established that  about this time Dozier goes on one of his hot streaks. Also he is unlikely to regress any further than where he is right now so he should move back to career norms.  Personally I'd say there is a very good chance he gets moved.  

     

    Look for what Moustakas nets and expect a similar to slightly better return for Dozier.

    While I'd prefer to see moves as suggested in this post...i see things playing out like this:

     

    Twins will get lose on 7/30 to be 5 back of Cleveland at the deadline and by then it will be too late to move anyone due to the Blue Jays, Rays, O's and other sellers will have moved everyone on their 25 man roster

     

    Once again left holding the "we got a chance" bag with nothing in it!

    Escobar is NOT an elite player. I doubt that he will command a super contract in the off-season. Call me wrong when it happens, but I doubt it. Worth $19? Not really.

     

    Teams stockpile relief pitchers for the playoffs, possibly guys to replace their 5th starter or real backend of the bullpen guys. The Twins have a few possibilities here. Are ANY of the Twins relief pitches irreplacable (Hildenberger, Pressly, Rogers, etc.).

     

     

    Maybe someone would want Morrison as a bench bat. But more of a salary dump in August and glad someone grabs the guy. Does the Santana option travel with him if traded? If he pans out in his last dozen starts, might not be bad to have him return for Lance Lynn money.

     

    The big question, are the Twins going into rebuild mode. Then you look at WHO on the roster should open in 2019. Who will they keep, at this point of time, in 2020. Who is still around in 2021.

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...