Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Twins Could Walk Away as Big Winners at the Trade Deadline

    If the Twins become sellers at the deadline, the return won't just be prospects. Moving several key veterans could also slash millions from this year's payroll and better position the organization for the future.

    Sam Caulder
    Image courtesy of Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images via Reuters Connect

    Twins Video

    As the Twins have stumbled out of the All-Star break, it grows increasingly likely that they will be sellers at the upcoming trade deadline.

    After last year's fire sale that shook up the roster, the Twins once again have several names that could be on the way out over the next week and a half. It isn't the position anyone in the organization hoped to be in; selling would be another sign that 2026 hasn't gone according to plan. However, there are long-term benefits that come with moving veterans and arbitration-eligible players. One of those benefits is how much money the Twins could potentially save from this year's payroll.

    Ryan Jeffers, Joe Ryan and Trevor Larnach are all names generating plenty of attention on the trade market. Each would bring back a player (or multiple) that could fit into the Twins’ long-term plans, but there's another layer to the discussion that shouldn't be overlooked.

    The offense would almost certainly take a step back in the short term without Jeffers and Larnach in the lineup. Ryan, meanwhile, has been the anchor of the rotation, and all three have spent their entire major league careers with the Twins. They drafted Larnach in the first round of the 2018 MLB Draft and used their second-rounder on Jeffers. Ryan was acquired from the Rays in July of 2021 as the headliner in the Nelson Cruz trade and has developed into one of the American League’s best pitchers. Moving on from three guys who have been around for that long is a tough thing to do as an organization. But not only would the hypothetical returns for those players help shape the organization's future; they would also clear millions of dollars from the payroll.

    All three are playing on one-year contracts. Ryan and Larnach each have a year of team control left in 2027, and Jeffers will hit the open market this winter. Despite the season being roughly two-thirds complete, there's little reason to continue paying those salaries if the organization no longer views this year's club as a legitimate contender. If those players don't fit into the long-term plans, there is value in moving them now rather than waiting.

    Looking at their contracts, Jeffers is making the most of the three at $6.7 million this season. Assuming roughly two-thirds of that salary has already been paid by the deadline, the Twins would save approximately $2.23 million by trading him. Ryan and Larnach would add even more savings. Between those two players, the Twins would clear roughly another $3.5 million from this year's payroll. Now you're talking about just under $6 million saved immediately, and that's before even considering how much will be avoided by not having to pay their next contract.

    The savings don't stop there, either. Veterans Josh Bell and Taylor Rogers are both playing on one-year deals and could very well be on the move if contenders come calling. Bell signed a one-year, $7 million contract. After accounting for his $250,000 signing bonus, he'll earn $6.75 million throughout the season. Rogers is making $2 million this year. Combined, that's just under $9 million in salary. With approximately one-third of the season remaining, moving both players would save the Twins nearly another $3 million from this year's payroll.

    And what if someone like Bailey Ober got moved? Like Ryan and Larnach, he has one more year of arbitration eligibility and could draw interest from a team looking to strengthen the back end of its rotation. Trading Ober would save approximately $1.73 million this season, and as much as I’m sure we’ll all miss his electric 88 MPH fastball, it’s tough to imagine he fits in the Twins’ future rotation plans.

    Put all of those moves together, and the Twins could (potentially) save around $10.5 million from this year's payroll by moving players who don't appear to fit into the organization's long-term plans. And that's before mentioning what might be the biggest benefit of all: adding another wave of young talent through trade returns. That's what this is really about. The Twins aren't simply trying to cut costs; they're trying to position themselves for the future. If the front office believes this core isn't capable of competing for a championship in 2026, maximizing the value of those assets becomes the logical next step.

    Looking ahead to 2027, there are even bigger financial questions looming. Nobody knows exactly what that season will look like—or whether there will even be a season—with a new Collective Bargaining Agreement set to become one of baseball's biggest storylines over the next year. The biggest component of that has centered around implementing a salary cap and a salary floor. 

    In the league's initial proposal, the salary floor would be set at $171.2 million. The Twins are currently one of 12 teams below that figure, and they're going to need far more than $10.5 million in savings to navigate whatever comes next. Minnesota's current payroll sits at roughly $106 million, leaving a massive gap between where it is today and where a potential salary floor could eventually be established. That's why, regardless of whether the Twins believed they were contenders this season, significant roster decisions were likely coming at some point anyway.

    Shipping out key pieces at the trade deadline is never enjoyable. That's especially true for Twins fans, who just watched last summer's fire sale reshape much of the roster. But baseball is a business as much as it's a game. If moving players who no longer fit the organization's long-term timeline allows the Twins to save money, acquire future talent and better position themselves for whatever comes next, it's a difficult decision that may ultimately make the most sense. And once again, that's the situation the Twins find themselves in.


    Want to play the role of Twins general manager? Check out our free-to-use "You're The GM" offseason tool and build your own Twins roster!

    Build Your 2027 Roster
    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Yasser Mercedes

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, OF
    On Thursday in the Fall League, Mercedes went 2-for-4 with his first double and his first homer run of the AFL season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    5 hours ago, LA Vikes Fan said:

    No offense Sam, but this just doesn’t make any sense from a money saving perspective. Saving $10.5 million is bubpkis money for an MLB team. The only reason that trading makes any sense is to get value for guys who don’t fit in your competitive time window. I would say that’s the best argument you could’ve made. It certainly applies to Jeffers. The problem is that while Ryan could get you a big haul, the other three guys aren’t gonna get you anything of value. None of them is worth an MLB ready talent or anyone ready next year. The best you could hope to do is get lucky on A ball guys who turn out to be something four years from now. More likely you will trade those guys for players who have to be nothing more than organizational filler. Almost as bad, you give a signal to the fans and the teams that you don’t think you’re gonna be competitive anytime soon, not this year, not next year, maybe 2028 if you’re lucky, but more likely 2029 or later. I just think a big selloff is not only a bad baseball move, it’s a bad business move.

    I look at this is very similar the idea of trading serious prospects for guys like Sonny Gray or other aging, expensive players. We shouldn’t do that either. This team isn’t good enough to mortgage the future for. If you make trades, you make trades for controllable players or MLB ready prospects, and you trade guys you’re going to lose for nothing at seasons end like Jeffers.

    I think the right move here is to do a little buying of controllable players, if you can get them, sell Jeffers because you don’t want him to walk away for nothing, and move on. If you got a couple of prospects, you think can help next year, get them up to the big club to get their feet wet. Ryan is the much tougher call, but I would keep him unless just blown away by a package that includes guys with an MLB track record and then trade him in the off-season. Otherwise, play this one out.

    100%
    They would save more by playing the rest of their home games during the day on the electricity bill at Target Field.

    That would vastly reduce attendance from the meager attendance already.

    the same goes for another sell-off. If there’s no reason to show up, why buy a ticket and buy a beer and a hot dog?

    as the old saying goes, gotta spend money to make money

    12 minutes ago, Andy MacPhail said:

    After gutting the team & blowing up the BP last deadline & doing nothing in the offseason; this team has done remarkably well, far better than most predicted. Many predicted that they'd compete with CWS for the cellar. Instead, they are somewhat competing with them for the division (They miss evaluating both teams) a lot can still happen. 

    I was sharply rebuked saying Zoll has full control in what goes on with the team. IF that is case, then it's all on him in what hasn't been done yet & what kind of trades that will take place. That will dictate if we have a good deadline or not; & less in who we trade or not

    Gutting the team? The only guys they traded were bullpen, really. 

    They are playing almost exactly how they were predicted to play by most. On pace for mid seventies wins . 

    1 hour ago, Richie the Rally Goat said:

    100%
    They would save more by playing the rest of their home games during the day on the electricity bill at Target Field.

    That would vastly reduce attendance from the meager attendance already.

    the same goes for another sell-off. If there’s no reason to show up, why buy a ticket and buy a beer and a hot dog?

    as the old saying goes, gotta spend money to make money

    You clearly underestimate the Pohlads understanding of running a MLB team...

    Well, someone had to go for the soft spot in Twins fandom....PAYROLL...

    I do like your argument Sam. I just think that savings is more a moot point than anything else. For me it's the lack of reinvestment that makes cutting payroll thoughts so toxic. Outside of Skubal, there's not many difference makers in the 2027 free agent market. There's a good starter or two and plenty of better BP arms. I highly doubt 10 mil or more in 2027 saved will affect the Twins free agent signings for 2027. 

    It's just been an odd season. The AL East isn't really all that dominate, The AL West teams may be worse than the AL centrals. The Red Sox and Tigers look like they've woke up. It's just not the time to waste recourses on a chance at 83 wins.

    I'm for most of the trades you suggest. I'd hold onto Royce. Trade the rentals. They might fetch a BP arm or two for 2027. Ryan only if it's 2 top 100 prospects plus. Promote some of the AAA guys. Play it out, they could still make the playoffs. 2027 be in it for a WC, 2028 be in it for the division.

    38 minutes ago, Hunter4848 said:

    You clearly underestimate the Pohlads understanding of running a MLB team...

    Tom gets it, even if you dont

    https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/tom-pohlad-strong-words-winning-205459609.html

    18 minutes ago, Richie the Rally Goat said:

    Tom gets it, even if you dont

    It's all bluster and bravado until he actually strokes the check. 

    Someone more media savvy than me can insert the Judge Smails meme. 

     

    5 hours ago, StiltedGopher said:

    Make best offer possible to Jeffers right now.  Jeffers is a high quality catcher and while we can be optimistic about our catcher prospects, realistically they are a couple years out.  I realize there is no chance the Twins will sign Jeffers, but this would be the strongest commitment they could show to the team and fans that they are committed to 2027, 2028.  

    Now for reality under the Pohlads, Jeffers is gone after this year.  Trade him now get something, hopefully a useful player for 2027/28.  

    Jeffers has only made about $16.8m in his career. He's 29, he's on top of his game, he's one of the best available catchers on the market this winter and he hired Scott Boras to make him some money. Even with a QO there's no way he forgoes the 5 year deal this winter for whatever he can get. And with the CBA open there's no guarantee that the QO compensation remains as lucrative as it is now (ie between rounds 1 and 2.)

    Between that and Caratini playing well enough during the hamate injury, I think most folks are comfortable trading him now in ways that they cannot see trading Joe Ryan. So we send him out.

    That leaves Joe Ryan and a couple other pieces in play that might draw a real return, like a solid hitter in Larnach or *maybe* a Josh Bell or Austin Martin.  The rest will not bring back much at all unless paired with prospects, and so we should mostly consider them as roster spots to be managed (or guys we like that could benefit from a change, eg Wallner.)

    I keep Ryan because I really think some form of floor or minimum payroll tax is coming and he's a guy I'd prefer to pay now as family rather than try to replace on the free agent market. I send Jeffers out and I pair some others like Martin or Lewis with youth to get controllable SP and bullpen arms. I keep an eye open for a good young 1B that can thump. 

    They can win at the deadline by making room for the incredible talent they have backing up in St Paul, by not throwing away this gift of a terrible AL in 2026, and by building on what they've learned in 2026 as they go into 2027: Keaschall is an OF, Taj is a front of rotation guy. Morris will be really good in the pen. Lee is not your SS. Lewis is not your 3B.  Wallner seems done. Larnach is a good platoon OF. Not all of these are news, but they were hypotheses that needed proving this year.  There's still time to write the book on Martin, Rodan, Lewis at 1B, and get a read on more kids. 

     

    7 hours ago, Parfigliano said:

    $10 million in payroll is a rounding error to the LAD.  Payroll disparity between teams has to be evened out in the next CBA.

    I second that! 

    The disparity in MLB is absurd:

    The Dodgers' luxury tax bill alone (around $160 million+) is bigger than the entire active payrolls of about a dozen MLB franchises, including the Twins.

    2 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Gutting the team? The only guys they traded were bullpen, really. 

    They trade Harrison Bader, Willie Castro, and Carlos Correa.....3 everyday players... 1/3 of the line-up..... How many guys do you have to trade to officially "gut" a team? 

    1 minute ago, Sjoski said:

    They trade Harrison Bader, Willie Castro, and Carlos Correa.....3 everyday players... 1/3 of the line-up..... How many guys do you have to trade to officially "gut" a team? 

    Fair. One of those guys was actually here past last year, which is what I thought you meant, that it was gutted for this year? But if you meant for last year, yes. 

    1 hour ago, Richie the Rally Goat said:

    I really hope Tom's business plan is more nuanced than just f'in win.  MLB is a zero sum game in that regard and if that's really the key then half the teams are in financial trouble each season, almost by definition.  Which... we know isn't the case, and the converse (looking at you, Tampa) also doesn't hold.  It's fine if Tom doesn't tell us everything he knows, and in fact I hope it's the case if that's what he does choose to tell us.

    I also didn't care much for the analysis in the article itself.  The Twins being "back into contention through young talent, veteran production from guys like Josh Bell, and an ace-caliber season from Joe Ryan" overstates the young talent, at least on offense where (at this writing several days later) the Twins' 10.8 WAR from position players largely comes from nearly 10 WAR from Buxton, Jeffers, Larnach, and Clemens, none of whom is likely to get carded at a neighborhood tavern. As for the pitching side, the plus signs have come from Ryan and Ober (not young), Bradley and Gomez (25 and 26, so yes, young).  There are young'uns on the roster; they are not currently the reason for being even in mild "contention."

    3 hours ago, Richie the Rally Goat said:

    I get that the current tenor on TD will lead mostly to comments ranging from “I’ll believe it when I see it” to “He’s just another *#¥^}^+ Pohlad,” but thanks for posting this. I think there has been a big gap on TD by no one reporting these comments.

    Call me naive, but I think they do bring a different narrative than past FO comments. He has said the right things from a PR perspective in terms of wanting to win back fans. I think he is smart enough to know that making these kinds of comments and then not following through would be an even worse PR disaster than he inherited. Will it be a $160 million payroll going forward? I wouldn’t count on it, but I do think there will be some level of increase.

     

    2 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Fair. One of those guys was actually here past last year, which is what I thought you meant, that it was gutted for this year? But if you meant for last year, yes. 

    I didn't make the original comment....was only commenting on what "gutted " means. You said it was the bullpen.  Yet...involved 3 everyday players. 

     

    5 hours ago, Andy MacPhail said:

    After gutting the team & blowing up the BP last deadline & doing nothing in the offseason; this team has done remarkably well, far better than most predicted. Many predicted that they'd compete with CWS for the cellar. Instead, they are somewhat competing with them for the division (They miss evaluating both teams) a lot can still happen. 

    I was sharply rebuked saying Zoll has full control in what goes on with the team. IF that is case, then it's all on him in what hasn't been done yet & what kind of trades that will take place. That will dictate if we have a good deadline or not; & less in who we trade or not

    My argument is that they didn't do nothing to replace Bader: Roden, Outman, and EmRod were all part of the plan, even if it hasn't turned out. They replaced Castro with Clemens (Castro would be planned to be utility if he was still here), and replace CC with Bell. Two of the three of those have turned out better for the TWins than if they had kept Castro and CC.....

    They didn't do much else this offseason, but I'm curious what people expected? They weren't bringing in an OFer, or a SS or a 3B or a 2B. They brought in a DH and C. That leaves 1B and RP (they weren't bringing n a difference making SP with this budget). 

    What 1B did y'all expect them to sign or trade for?

    RP? Yes, I'd have brought in two guys, and converted Morris sooner.....

    17 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    My argument is that they didn't do nothing to replace Bader: Roden, Outman, and EmRod were all part of the plan, even if it hasn't turned out. They replaced Castro with Clemens (Castro would be planned to be utility if he was still here), and replace CC with Bell. Two of the three of those have turned out better for the TWins than if they had kept Castro and CC.....

    They didn't do much else this offseason, but I'm curious what people expected? They weren't bringing in an OFer, or a SS or a 3B or a 2B. They brought in a DH and C. That leaves 1B and RP (they weren't bringing n a difference making SP with this budget). 

    What 1B did y'all expect them to sign or trade for?

    RP? Yes, I'd have brought in two guys, and converted Morris sooner.....

    Add, I would not have wasted last August/September relief innings on the DFA fodder. They needed to convert Morris and Festa last year

    14 hours ago, Patzky said:

    Ten million saved.  Really. You gotta pay somebody, can't just run around with four empty roster spots. We're paying Carlos Correa that much not to play for us (or play at all, it turns out)

    Cutting just to save, I thought we were past that point. Not a good look.

    Im confused. If the new minimum might be 171 mill sounds like we need to spend alot MORE money. Signing Ryan to a 32 mill a year contract would make up half that gap. 

    Let's sign Ryan then .. Jeffers and or Larnach can go because we have replacements coming up. Then spend another 12-15 mill in the off season strengthening out bullpen 

    22 hours ago, StiltedGopher said:

    Make best offer possible to Jeffers right now.  Jeffers is a high quality catcher and while we can be optimistic about our catcher prospects, realistically they are a couple years out.  I realize there is no chance the Twins will sign Jeffers, but this would be the strongest commitment they could show to the team and fans that they are committed to 2027, 2028.  

    From what I have seen over the years, those types of mid-season contract offers never amount to anything.  That ship has sailed. Jeffers is having a great season, but I don't see the Twins signing him to an extension. Seems like the best strategy is to trade him while his value is at an all-time high. 

    Ryan, Larnach and  Ober can all help the Twins win the AL Central title this year and also next year, whereas more prospects probably won't help this year or probably next year either. By trading these three team-controlled in 2027 players, the Twins are hurting themselves for two years, not just one. 

    52 minutes ago, tarheeltwinsfan said:

    Ryan, Larnach and  Ober can all help the Twins win the AL Central title this year and also next year, whereas more prospects probably won't help this year or probably next year either. By trading these three team-controlled in 2027 players, the Twins are hurting themselves for two years, not just one. 

    I think this is a valid take. I just don't agree completely. But it's a valid piece of logic. 

    An interesting poll ? For Twinsdaily. 

    Would you rather see the Twins buy or sell at the deadline this year? 

    This should be posted at the top so everyone can see and vote and discuss why or why not in the comments.  I think we should bring up Culpepper and Jenkins to finish the year helping our offense and we should trade for a starting pitcher and maybe a reliever.  (The starter pushes either Matthews or Preliepp to the pen) And get another reliever.  

    That would be good for the young guys to start off in a pennant race.  

    32 minutes ago, Brandon said:

    You mean the one that leads the American League in scoring?

    Yep. Regression is not gonna be your friend. I also would like a lineup that can pick up a batted ball. Put it to you this way - do you think this lineup will compete for championships?

    On 7/25/2026 at 8:59 AM, Patzky said:

    Ten million saved.  Really. You gotta pay somebody, can't just run around with four empty roster spots. We're paying Carlos Correa that much not to play for us (or play at all, it turns out)

    Cutting just to save, I thought we were past that point. Not a good look.

    It really makes no sense if the potential FLOOR is $171M for next year…… even if it’s $140M, why trade players that are effective (Ryan - Jeffers - Larnach) ????? Is the plan to pay Royce Lewis & Brooks Lee $15M/year each next year because they don’t have anyone else to spend $$ on after this year’s trades??

    They only got one fringy top 100 prospect in last years sell off. And history clearly shows the team getting the star player wins about 75% of the trades involving prospects. 
     

    I keep both Ryan and Jeffers if possible. I know it looks pretty blasé right now, but if kept, I think this club is going to be really good next year if two things happen. 1) either Jenkins, Culpepper, E-Rod or another homegrown talent can be a legit #2-5 hitter in the lineup. 2) Instead of blowing their budget on five players, they mostly use it on ONE free agent/trade for a front line starter. 
     

    Obviously neither of those are remotely close to sure things, but I think the odds of those things happening and the Twins making 2027 a year of legit contention is higher than trading Ryan and Jeffers and being a legit contender later in some undefined window.
     

     

    13 hours ago, Linus said:

    Yep. Regression is not gonna be your friend. I also would like a lineup that can pick up a batted ball. Put it to you this way - do you think this lineup will compete for championships?

    The biggest holes in the lineup is RF and SS.  We have top prospects ready to come up at any time now, Lewis and Keaschall are hitting better now than before.  Lee and Clemens are the same.  As is Larnarch.  The regression you are talking about must be from Gray and Martin.  SS and RF.  Culpepper and a number of OF prospects are ready to step in.

      




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...