Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

Until 2023, the Derek Falvey and Thad Levine-led Twins were aggressive in the deployment of defensive shifts on the infield. This season, new rules prohibited that--but the Twins kept innovating and pushing the envelope.

Image courtesy of © Jordan Johnson-USA TODAY Sports

In 2022, the Minnesota Twins used an infield shift in MLB's sixth-highest share of all plate appearances against them. They had Carlos Correa at shortstop, but as usual, their overall infield defense reflected their team-building priorities--that is, it was weak, because they sacrificed a bit of glove for the thump they could find in the exchange. Sometimes, the best defense is a good offense.

Baseball saw a handful of important rule changes in 2023, though, including a ban on the defensive shift as we had previously known it. No longer could teams put more than two infielders on one side of second base. Nor could those infielders set up with their feet on the outfield grass, be it by a step or two or by dozens of feet, as they had done so often throughout history--but especially over the previous 20 years.

As will always happen when new constraints are put in place, teams adjusted and innovated, pushing those limits as far as they could but also bending to the new reality. Instead of the extreme shift, teams merely employed heavy shading--something used more often than is generally remembered, even as far back at the 1950s and certainly since the 1980s. With a left-handed batter at the plate, it wasn't uncommon to find a second baseman with his heels kissing the sides of the first blades of the grass, and wheeled over toward first base. The shortstop could be found, in those cases, lining themselves up as close to the imaginary line passing through the keystone en route to center field as the second-base umpire allowed.

After trading for Kyle Farmer over the winter and with Jorge Polanco turning 30 during the season, the team had an aging infield, and as they broke in Royce Lewis as a full-time third baseman and rookie Edouard Julien at second, they were again consciously trading off some defensive prowess for thump in the lineup. When injuries and ineffectiveness forced them to turn to Donovan Solano more often, and when Correa developed plantar fasciitis that limited his range, they got even more unathletic around the horn.

Shading was the team's way of making up for that. No team in baseball utilized Shades more often, overall, than the Twins did this past season.

Team Shade % v RHB Team Shade % v LHB
Atlanta 24.3 Texas 74.1
Miami 23.1 Minnesota 62.9
Tampa Bay 22.5 Detroit 58.6
Minnesota 18.3 Los Angeles (N) 56.3
Cincinnati 11.5 Houston 56.3

This method made sense. It was a way for the team to get the bats of both Polanco and Julien in the lineup at some times, and to get both Polanco and Solano in the lineup at others. It reflected the team's strong lean toward fly balls and emphasis on strikeouts from the pitching staff. Why put your resources into bulking up an infield defense that will, by design, be depended on less than any of its counterparts throughout the league?

All that skirts the most important question, though: Did it work?


View full article

Posted

I don't know why you wouldn't move your defense around, depending on who was up to bat.  L/R platoon splits being only one reason.  Athleticism of your players isn't really the reason, you just want to optimize where you expect the ball might go, whoever you have put out there.

I guess I'm missing the point of this article.  That, other teams, somehow, don't shade?  That would be surprising.

Posted
1 minute ago, ashbury said:

I don't know why you wouldn't move your defense around, depending on who was up to bat.  L/R platoon splits being only one reason.  Athleticism of your players isn't really the reason, you just want to optimize where you expect the ball might go, whoever you have put out there.

I guess I'm missing the point of this article.  That, other teams, somehow, don't shade?  That would be surprising.

Not that they didn't shade. Of course, they did. But literally every other team in baseball shaded *less* than the Twins did.

Posted
21 hours ago, ashbury said:

I guess I'm missing the point of this article.  That, other teams, somehow, don't shade?  That would be surprising.

I "think" the point of the article is that it's mid-December, the front office hasn't given us anything to discuss, and I want to write something.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...