Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Mike Sixel said:

Trey Lance for the Vikings 2024 second? Cheap for two years, franchise for two years. Do you take that chance? He sits next year to get healthy and learn the offense

I dont see what Lance has done to date to even talk about franchising him in 2 years.

Posted
30 minutes ago, Parfigliano said:

I dont see what Lance has done to date to even talk about franchising him in 2 years.

Nothing. But would you take that chance for a 2nd? How else do you expect to find a QB?

Posted
On 1/24/2023 at 8:13 PM, Hosken Bombo Disco said:

Seeing this pic in my feed of a young Burrow in a GOAT jersey tips the scales, and I’m pulling for the Bengals. 

 

01875401-3E3E-4449-9A37-8A6583E4DBB0.jpeg

His dad coached at NDSU so he spent his elementary school years in Fargo, which is obviously Vikings country. Pretty sure he'd moved on to wherever his dad coached next by the time that photo was taken though, pretty cool he was still rocking the Moss jersey!

Posted
On 1/24/2023 at 2:11 PM, Mike Sixel said:

Nothing. But would you take that chance for a 2nd? How else do you expect to find a QB?

I'd be interested in Lance, but the problem is going to be that they'd have to decide on picking up his 5th year option after next year, and assuming he's sitting for a year under Cousin's, they probably will have no idea if they should pick it up.

Posted
9 minutes ago, nicksaviking said:

I'd be interested in Lance, but the problem is going to be that t thathey'd have to decide on picking up his 5th year option after next year, and assuming he's sitting for a year under Cousin's, they probably will have no idea if they should pick it up.

It's a huge risk, if you think a second is huge. That said, if I'm SF, I want a legit backup next year.....

Posted
1 hour ago, Mike Sixel said:

It's a huge risk, if you think a second is huge. That said, if I'm SF, I want a legit backup next year.....

Yeah, big risk, but if last year's draft was a barometer for how this regime evaluates players, 2nd round picks may not be terribly valuable to this club.

SF may prefer a Bridgwater or even a Mike White type. They'd have to deal with some heavy fallout trading him for only a 2nd rounder though. And SF would probably prefer to deal him outside of the conference. The GM who drafted him is now in Tennessee and they have an unsettled QB situation, I wouldn't be surprised if the Vikings would have to pay more than most people would feel comfortable with.

Posted
20 minutes ago, nicksaviking said:

Yeah, big risk, but if last year's draft was a barometer for how this regime evaluates players, 2nd round picks may not be terribly valuable to this club.

SF may prefer a Bridgwater or even a Mike White type. They'd have to deal with some heavy fallout trading him for only a 2nd rounder though. And SF would probably prefer to deal him outside of the conference. The GM who drafted him is now in Tennessee and they have an unsettled QB situation, I wouldn't be surprised if the Vikings would have to pay more than most people would feel comfortable with.

I'm not too down on the last draft. A few injuries and a few mistakes in your first draft isn't the end of the world....not that I love the draft. 

Posted
On 1/27/2023 at 12:50 PM, nicksaviking said:

Yeah, big risk, but if last year's draft was a barometer for how this regime evaluates players, 2nd round picks may not be terribly valuable to this club.

SF may prefer a Bridgwater or even a Mike White type. They'd have to deal with some heavy fallout trading him for only a 2nd rounder though. And SF would probably prefer to deal him outside of the conference. The GM who drafted him is now in Tennessee and they have an unsettled QB situation, I wouldn't be surprised if the Vikings would have to pay more than most people would feel comfortable with.

Funnily enough, Brock Purdy is exactly what I'd call a "Bridgewater/White type".

Posted

So the NFL did the “expedited review” a handful of times when the Vikings played the giants despite never doing it during the regular season. Now they just let play continue when the eagles WR clearly did not hold on the ball. A monumental no review. Led directly to a touchdown. Inexcusable 

Posted
34 minutes ago, Aggies7 said:

So the NFL did the “expedited review” a handful of times when the Vikings played the giants despite never doing it during the regular season. Now they just let play continue when the eagles WR clearly did not hold on the ball. A monumental no review. Led directly to a touchdown. Inexcusable 

All a part of the plan those in the NFL fixes  games camp would say.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Parfigliano said:

All a part of the plan those in the NFL fixes  games camp would say.

It is hard to explain though. How could the official not stand over the ball and hold up play if you’re doing the expedited review? They had no problem doing it for our game 

Posted
Just now, LVTwinsfan said:

That’s a face mask, have to call it

music video GIF by Tritonal

What face mask? - This ref crew. False start is also not a penalty to these officials. 

Posted
Just now, Vanimal46 said:

music video GIF by Tritonal

What face mask? - This ref crew. False start is also not a penalty to these officials. 

Seriously. The eagles have been moving before the snap all day

Posted
10 minutes ago, Aggies7 said:

Sick to my stomach watching this lol

Not a fan of a poorly played game that the refs inject themselves into?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...