Game7-91 Verified Member Posted August 14, 2022 Posted August 14, 2022 How much do injuries affect team performance, and W-L record? Using Spotrac IL tracker, I put together this team-by-team record of current IL trends for each team. The Twins rank tied for 2nd in most players spending time on IL this season, 4th in most games lost, and FWIW 13th or so in salary lost to IL. Only Cincinatti has lost more players to IL, with 33. OTOH, Cleveland is 2nd with fewest games lost, the Twins standing a healthy 61% more than Cleveland in total games lost. The average number of players lost is 20.6, median is 20 as well. Twins are 37% above MLB average. I will leave to others with stat skills if someone has the interest and time to extrapolate any relationships between IL and W-L, standings, etc....The numbers are not wholly explanatory, as this only tracks IL, not actual injured status. So Buck for example does not show up outside of his earlier IL stint, even though his performance is clearly impacted by chronic injury. But it still is interesting to see the raw data. And wonder, is this a measurement of overall organizational effectiveness at finding wins from injury prevention/injury management processes? If so, it seems the Twins as an organization are lacking. Or is it just random chance? TEAM PLAYERS GAMES SALARY Minnesota Twins 28 1,482 $19,695,754 Chicago White Sox 22 1,034 $27,311,959 Cleveland Guardians 14 590 $1,873,537 Cincinnati Reds 33 1,805 $19,146,288 Houston Astros 13 668 $21,323,396 New York Yankees 19 908 $27,734,718 Arizona Diamondbacks 18 657 $8,515,647 Texas Rangers 20 593 $8,408,691 Detroit Tigers 22 1,228 $13,213,117 Philadelphia Phillies 24 1,090 $19,588,138 Toronto Blue Jays 15 681 $19,077,925 Tampa Bay Rays 27 1,681 $18,963,632 Washington Nationals 21 1,465 $37,151,205 St. Louis Cardinals 15 687 $15,527,953 Pittsburgh Pirates 28 1,248 $7,451,460 Seattle Mariners 19 928 $11,917,427 San Diego Padres 18 1,105 $28,998,575 San Francisco Giants 23 935 $27,803,734 Oakland Athletics 20 770 $4,919,680 New York Mets 18 957 $43,906,012 Milwaukee Brewers 21 881 $8,584,348 Kansas City Royals 20 756 $11,191,535 Los Angeles Angels 18 960 $26,494,588 Boston Red Sox 23 1,316 $49,669,322 Los Angeles Dodgers 22 1,379 $31,843,729 Miami Marlins 27 1,118 $9,695,396 Atlanta Braves 16 906 $18,159,353 Baltimore Orioles 12 577 $3,845,750 Chicago Cubs 27 1,558 $31,065,902 Colorado Rockies 17 780 $14,883,593
Rosterman Verified Member Posted August 14, 2022 Posted August 14, 2022 Looking ahed to 2023: Returning arms to the rotation: Paddack, Dobnak, Ober and Maeda. Relief arms: Alcala, Stashak, Coulombe, Romero. Catcher: Jeffers Infielders: Lewis (but not Sano). Outfielders: Kirilloff, Larnach, Garlick. That could be HALF the current roster. Granted, a few won't return, joining Sano elsewhere. We can still see some return in September, but msot will involve a corresponding roster move down to the minors or off the 40-man by someone currently on the 40-man. But, yeah - that's a nice piece of change the Twins have sitting in the trainer's room not able to play!
BH67 Verified Member Posted August 14, 2022 Posted August 14, 2022 Here's a different question. My recall is that the Twins are consistently above the MLB norm in player days on the injured list. If the data of the last three years support that, then what are the Twins NOT doing in terms of conditioning that needs be addressed pronto?
Game7-91 Verified Member Posted August 15, 2022 Author Posted August 15, 2022 1 hour ago, BH67 said: Here's a different question. My recall is that the Twins are consistently above the MLB norm in player days on the injured list. If the data of the last three years support that, then what are the Twins NOT doing in terms of conditioning that needs be addressed pronto? Great point. I clarified that first question a bit to better get the gist of what I was trying to ask, but this is pretty much it. Does injury prevention/injury management need a re-working? It does seem year-after-year we are left to wonder at some odd injury management decisions. Maybe someday I will dig a little deeper into past seasons to see where Twins stand comparatively over time.
Hosken Bombo Disco Community Moderator Posted August 15, 2022 Posted August 15, 2022 Great post. It’s definitely a start to try to figure out how much injuries really are hurting (hurting the team, that is, not the ailing player with the injury). i wonder if Maeda is counted in here? He would be valuable to have, but then, we weren’t really counting on him at all this season. So on first reaction I would call Maeda’s injury as not hurting the team this season. I also wonder if this can be broken down by WAR? Seems like a lot of teams are still dealing with the injury bug. Last year was historic for injuries, if you remember. But this year I know the Dodgers and Mets have been without Kershaw and Buehler, and DeGrom and Scherzer, for stretches. The Twins don’t have equivalents for those guys. thanks!
Game7-91 Verified Member Posted August 15, 2022 Author Posted August 15, 2022 30 minutes ago, Hosken Bombo Disco said: Great post. It’s definitely a start to try to figure out how much injuries really are hurting (hurting the team, that is, not the ailing player with the injury). i wonder if Maeda is counted in here? He would be valuable to have, but then, we weren’t really counting on him at all this season. So on first reaction I would call Maeda’s injury as not hurting the team this season. I also wonder if this can be broken down by WAR? Seems like a lot of teams are still dealing with the injury bug. Last year was historic for injuries, if you remember. But this year I know the Dodgers and Mets have been without Kershaw and Buehler, and DeGrom and Scherzer, for stretches. The Twins don’t have equivalents for those guys. thanks! Good question on Maeda. Just checked, both he and Dobnak are included. 17 of the 28 players on Twins list are pitchers.
Trov Verified Member Posted August 15, 2022 Posted August 15, 2022 One thing the data does not have is games not played by Buxton and games played as DH, limiting his value. Buxton has only played 54 games in CF, with only 48 started, and 32 games at DH, 31 he started. So he has not been on the IL, but he sure has been impacted by his injury in lack of games in CF and possibly reduction in output. He has put up big power numbers, but his is not putting up the numbers he did last year. Looks like last year might have been the outlier year of his career in his contract year. Hopefully next year can at least stay in CF most of the time.
Shaitan Verified Member Posted August 15, 2022 Posted August 15, 2022 9 hours ago, Trov said: One thing the data does not have is games not played by Buxton and games played as DH, limiting his value. Buxton has only played 54 games in CF, with only 48 started, and 32 games at DH, 31 he started. So he has not been on the IL, but he sure has been impacted by his injury in lack of games in CF and possibly reduction in output. He has put up big power numbers, but his is not putting up the numbers he did last year. Looks like last year might have been the outlier year of his career in his contract year. Hopefully next year can at least stay in CF most of the time. Alternate take: Buxton is more valuable at DH than on the IL. My point here isn't to be contrarian. It's too say there are so, so very many variables to measure if one team is more "injury prone" than another. The data is interesting, for sure. But it doesn't tell a story. Is Paddack's (or even Maeda's) injury the Twins' fault? Is the team any worse off without Dobnak or Garlick? Do some players just have different genes that are more likely for certain injuries? Not of this is revealed in this data. It shows a comparison to other teams. It's absolutely interesting and I'm sure the FO is aware of it and trying to reduce numbers in future years. But it I find it hard to believe that it reveals the Twins are have poor conditioning or anything along those lines. (And how it the data collected? Because Maeda may be "on the IL" for 162 games, but he's only missing 35 he'd actually play in.)
Marek Houston Wichita Wind Surge - AA SS On Saturday, Houston went 3-for-5 and scored two runs. After a short slump, he is now back over .290 on the season. Explore Marek Houston News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.