Vanimal46 Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 2nd inter-division trade for Kwesi.
TheLeviathan Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 Vikes trade with the Packers!
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Author Posted April 29, 2022 One high second for two last seconds.....there better be a starting CB there still...
nicksaviking Community Moderator Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 Are the Vikings going to bring two generational WR to do he NFC north via trade?
TheLeviathan Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 By most trade value charts this is a huge win for the Vikings. Let's hope there are some guys still there.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Author Posted April 29, 2022 When you complain about MN helping GB, just remember if MN doesn't make this deal, someone else does.....most likely. Five picks in the top 77......they should get 3-4 starters and 2 decent players out of that.
nicksaviking Community Moderator Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 1 minute ago, Mike Sixel said: When you complain about MN helping GB, just remember if MN doesn't make this deal, someone else does.....most likely. Five picks in the top 77......they should get 3-4 starters and 2 decent players out of that. That would be nice, but historically this team needs its arm twisted to even start 1st round picks.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Author Posted April 29, 2022 1 minute ago, nicksaviking said: That would be nice, but historically this team needs its arm twisted to even start 1st round picks. Completely new coaching staff. I have no idea why we'd be worried about that right now.
TheLeviathan Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 1 minute ago, nicksaviking said: That would be nice, but historically this team needs its arm twisted to even start 1st round picks. Let's hope that died with the old regime. It was, by far, my biggest complaint with that group.
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 1 minute ago, Mike Sixel said: When you complain about MN helping GB, just remember if MN doesn't make this deal, someone else does.....most likely. Five picks in the top 77......they should get 3-4 starters and 2 decent players out of that. It would be nice of them to use a few of them.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Author Posted April 29, 2022 Just now, gunnarthor said: It would be nice of them to use a few of them. Top 100 or so is where the value completely changes. I'd bet good money they use these picks. I'd not be surprised if they trade back up.....
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 I also hate that they helped Det and despise that they helped GB.
Vanimal46 Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 I was on the fence initially about the trade yesterday, but this one with the Packers is highway robbery. I love the deal.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Author Posted April 29, 2022 2 minutes ago, Vanimal46 said: Trading to get more top 100 picks is not the same as getting 7th round picks....we'll see if they trade down more...I get this is likely a joke...
Vanimal46 Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 Just now, gunnarthor said: I also hate that they helped Det and despise that they helped GB. I mean, did we help GB when they massively overpaid to move up? If anything they helped us.
Vanimal46 Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 Just now, Mike Sixel said: Trading to get more top 100 picks is not the same as getting 7th round picks....we'll see if they trade down more... Oh I know. Just saw it online and laughed. Spielman’s philosophy is sound… He just lost his way drafting the talent.
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 1 minute ago, Vanimal46 said: I mean, did we help GB when they massively overpaid to move up? If anything they helped us. Yes, because it made Rodgers happy. I'd have rather we drafted that WR just to keep them from GB. Also, I hate GB more than I love the Vkings.
Vanimal46 Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 First Gopher off the board! Ski-U-Mah!
Vanimal46 Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 3 minutes ago, gunnarthor said: Yes, because it made Rodgers happy. I'd have rather we drafted that WR just to keep them from GB. Also, I hate GB more than I love the Vkings. They were going to draft a WR regardless.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Author Posted April 29, 2022 1 minute ago, Vanimal46 said: They were going to draft a WR regardless. And likely trade up with someone else to get him.....this way, MN gets the xtra pick. Now they need to execute ...
TheLeviathan Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 5 minutes ago, gunnarthor said: Yes, because it made Rodgers happy. I'd have rather we drafted that WR just to keep them from GB. Also, I hate GB more than I love the Vkings. But he has serious issues with drops. Maybe we're secretly trolling him with a WR that is going to piss him off!
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 All the logic and reasonableness on this forum is not right. I want to complain!!! Boo Green Bay!
TheLeviathan Old-Timey Member Posted April 29, 2022 Posted April 29, 2022 42 and 122 for 53, 77, and 192
Dasan Hill Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+ SP Dasan Hill was the key piece heading to the Toronto Blue Jays organization in the Jeff Hoffman trade. Explore Dasan Hill News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.