Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

When you complain about MN helping GB, just remember if MN doesn't make this deal, someone else does.....most likely.

Five picks in the top 77......they should get 3-4 starters and 2 decent players out of that. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Mike Sixel said:

When you complain about MN helping GB, just remember if MN doesn't make this deal, someone else does.....most likely.

Five picks in the top 77......they should get 3-4 starters and 2 decent players out of that. 

That would be nice, but historically this team needs its arm twisted to even start 1st round picks.

Posted
1 minute ago, nicksaviking said:

That would be nice, but historically this team needs its arm twisted to even start 1st round picks.


Completely new coaching staff. I have no idea why we'd be worried about that right now.

Posted
1 minute ago, Mike Sixel said:

When you complain about MN helping GB, just remember if MN doesn't make this deal, someone else does.....most likely.

Five picks in the top 77......they should get 3-4 starters and 2 decent players out of that. 

It would be nice of them to use a few of them.

Posted
Just now, gunnarthor said:

It would be nice of them to use a few of them.

Top 100 or so is where the value completely changes. I'd bet good money they use these picks. I'd not be surprised if they trade back up.....

Posted
Just now, gunnarthor said:

I also hate that they helped Det and despise that they helped GB.

I mean, did we help GB when they massively overpaid to move up? If anything they helped us. 

Posted
Just now, Mike Sixel said:

Trading to get more top 100 picks is not the same as getting 7th round picks....we'll see if they trade down more...

Oh I know. Just saw it online and laughed. Spielman’s philosophy is sound… He just lost his way drafting the talent. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Vanimal46 said:

I mean, did we help GB when they massively overpaid to move up? If anything they helped us. 

Yes, because it made Rodgers happy. I'd have rather we drafted that WR just to keep them from GB. Also, I hate GB more than I love the Vkings.

Posted
3 minutes ago, gunnarthor said:

Yes, because it made Rodgers happy. I'd have rather we drafted that WR just to keep them from GB. Also, I hate GB more than I love the Vkings.

They were going to draft a WR regardless. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, gunnarthor said:

Yes, because it made Rodgers happy. I'd have rather we drafted that WR just to keep them from GB. Also, I hate GB more than I love the Vkings.

But he has serious issues with drops.  Maybe we're secretly trolling him with a WR that is going to piss him off!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...