Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

2022 Vikings Off-Season Thread


Mike Sixel

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 752
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

When you complain about MN helping GB, just remember if MN doesn't make this deal, someone else does.....most likely.

Five picks in the top 77......they should get 3-4 starters and 2 decent players out of that. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Mike Sixel said:

When you complain about MN helping GB, just remember if MN doesn't make this deal, someone else does.....most likely.

Five picks in the top 77......they should get 3-4 starters and 2 decent players out of that. 

That would be nice, but historically this team needs its arm twisted to even start 1st round picks.

Posted
1 minute ago, nicksaviking said:

That would be nice, but historically this team needs its arm twisted to even start 1st round picks.


Completely new coaching staff. I have no idea why we'd be worried about that right now.

Posted
1 minute ago, nicksaviking said:

That would be nice, but historically this team needs its arm twisted to even start 1st round picks.

Let's hope that died with the old regime.  It was, by far, my biggest complaint with that group.

Posted
1 minute ago, Mike Sixel said:

When you complain about MN helping GB, just remember if MN doesn't make this deal, someone else does.....most likely.

Five picks in the top 77......they should get 3-4 starters and 2 decent players out of that. 

It would be nice of them to use a few of them.

Posted
Just now, gunnarthor said:

It would be nice of them to use a few of them.

Top 100 or so is where the value completely changes. I'd bet good money they use these picks. I'd not be surprised if they trade back up.....

Posted
2 minutes ago, Vanimal46 said:

1AB05583-A418-4D4F-BEEA-DBB0CFA1CF38.jpeg.0eae74f345c3fb5d9d76e56f55da1e89.jpeg

Trading to get more top 100 picks is not the same as getting 7th round picks....we'll see if they trade down more...I get this is likely a joke...

Posted
Just now, gunnarthor said:

I also hate that they helped Det and despise that they helped GB.

I mean, did we help GB when they massively overpaid to move up? If anything they helped us. 

Posted
Just now, Mike Sixel said:

Trading to get more top 100 picks is not the same as getting 7th round picks....we'll see if they trade down more...

Oh I know. Just saw it online and laughed. Spielman’s philosophy is sound… He just lost his way drafting the talent. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Vanimal46 said:

I mean, did we help GB when they massively overpaid to move up? If anything they helped us. 

Yes, because it made Rodgers happy. I'd have rather we drafted that WR just to keep them from GB. Also, I hate GB more than I love the Vkings.

Posted
3 minutes ago, gunnarthor said:

Yes, because it made Rodgers happy. I'd have rather we drafted that WR just to keep them from GB. Also, I hate GB more than I love the Vkings.

They were going to draft a WR regardless. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Vanimal46 said:

They were going to draft a WR regardless. 

And likely trade up with someone else to get him.....this way, MN gets the xtra pick. Now they need to execute ...

Posted
5 minutes ago, gunnarthor said:

Yes, because it made Rodgers happy. I'd have rather we drafted that WR just to keep them from GB. Also, I hate GB more than I love the Vkings.

But he has serious issues with drops.  Maybe we're secretly trolling him with a WR that is going to piss him off!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...