Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Shaitan

Verified Member
  • Posts

    2,889
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Shaitan

  1. At least it's the offseason. I feel for the players who get stuck in this limbo in July.
  2. What's his inning max this year, 125-ish?
  3. You discussed how he can play multiple positions, but I didn't see any discussion if he can play them well. Is he an offense-first utility player, or do you leave him out there in a 1-run game?
  4. Very clever. But, yes, it does change the value of the deal.
  5. I said in a "should they sign him" piece that the proposed $6.75m was too much. At $5m I think this signing is fine. That it: it's fine.
  6. I think Soler makes a lot of sense. But never backload a contract. All you're doing is pushing your current problems to the future.
  7. "Inquired" Of course they did. He's known to be on the trade block and they were negotiating a trade.
  8. I don't think $6.75million is cheap if he's only signed to bat against LHP. That's a lot of money per AB. The money could be better spent elsewhere.
  9. Yes, relievers are fickle. But he was never the same after the suspension.
  10. Good point. It's there as a category, I guess. Though my eyes glaze over that. I read headlines first, author second. Ignore the H3 or whatever "Caretakers is." I do appreciate the response/discussion here. And I'll note this for the future, of course. But it doesn't feel intuitive to this one reader.
  11. It feels like clickbait when caretaker articles aren't labeled as such from the homepage.
  12. I'm honestly surprised how many have turned into serviceable MLB players. I'm curious how that compares to other teams. Though the first half of R1 is far different than the 27th overall pick. People place too much stock in rounds.
  13. The Venezuelan vs. Venezuelan stat is cool.
  14. There are countless AAAA players they can drop off the roster at any point. People make too big a deal of this issue. This team has depth, but not that much depth.
  15. Um, what level of [uncontrolled] player do you expect for $1M? A back end reliever at $1M is as cheap as it gets. And if he can't contribute, they aren't spending a roster spot on him. He'll be waived or on the 60-day IL.
  16. They have enough "are they healthy?" players on this roster. On a Solano-type deal, where there is no risk, in a heartbeat. But that isn't happening. Spend the that kind of money or RP or everyday starters without spotty injury histories.
  17. I think that it forces decisions about the 40 roster spots it why it sticks. That is a good thing for all players, even if DFA limbo has its own set of drawbacks. The MLBPA signs off on this for a reason, and they generally look out for their best interests.
  18. You have to trade quality to get quality. It's really that simple. I'd listen to all offers. And unless there are health concerns in the middle IF going into Spring, go from there...
  19. No mention of Ryan Pressley? As others have said, it's more about the concept as a whole than that 1 year rule change. The draft forces teams to carry developmental players on the MLB roster -- often for multiple years before they peak (even Santana). I'd be curious to see actual pre/post 2006 data though. How many players have stuck for the year? What is their WAR within their controlled years and how does that compare before and after? All Star appearances are interesting trivia, but they don't mean anything in terms of value.
×
×
  • Create New...