I guess I didn't make my point very clear, either ... I guess when there is a situation where one side is truly in the wrong, causing harm to the other side and to the whole of the product, I'm willing and do continue to support the aggrieved party, I am still willing to spend my time and money because there is a clear side to support and to believe in. In the MLB situation, both sides, as I said, need to get over themselves. That's why I don't find it a comparable situation, for me. In one situation, not easy for me to just abandon them, in the other, eh, I will spend no time and money on it if the two sides can't find a way to get over themselves. If the MLB situation was truly a one-sided affair, wouldn't you find it easier to support one over the other, and care about the outcome, and still want to do what you could to support that side? That's me. I cared about the players and the outcome in one situation, I care far less about the outcome in the other.