Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

dxpavelka

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    3,653
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by dxpavelka

  1. But if that happens who is gonna challenge the team strikeout record?
  2. MIGHT a good idea to not move on from a guy until you are certain that the replacement(s) can perform at a level at least the same as the fella you're moving on from. Three years out on Rosario and our LFs are nowhere near what he's done since or before he left. On a positive note, at least Gallo has missed enough time with injuries that he likely won't break the team strikeout record. Unless he goes on a surge.
  3. I remember a few years back when we felt that Eddie Rosario was finished. Now all he does is win.
  4. 1975. Disco Danny Ford hit .280 with 15 home runs and Lyman Bostock hit .282. Nobody really noticed them as Fred Lynn & Jim Rice finished 1, 2 in the ROY race and nobody else got votes and Lynn & Rice also finished 1,3 in the MVP voting that year. Jim Hughes won 16 games as rookie SP, besting Bert Blylevin by one for the team lead. If you're not old you won't remember any of that.
  5. Great talent can overcome a crappy clubhouse but most teams don't have great talent.
  6. At least we didn't follow it up by also trading Duran
  7. If this article had been three paragraphs shorter it wouldn't have had the word "Gallo" in it. SO CLOSE!!
  8. New school says bring in your best reliever in the 8th. Old school says you're screwed for having done so. Got ya.
  9. Martin Maldonado
  10. But at least now we can be excited when we are bringing them. Some of those guys 8-9 years ago were terrifying at just the thought of them coming up. And I'm not saying we don't have a way to go yet. The mere fact that you used the word Garlick cements that.
  11. Yes. Turns out that maybe, just maybe, the guys that get paid to make the decisions actually know more than those who wish they did.
  12. and yet we still ended up calling up guys like bernier, albers, mastroianni, burton, fryer, achter, schafer, light, granite & busenitz over the next half decade. Just feels like we're at a point where calling guys up seems like positive rather than scary thing.
  13. actually I never said not to use the new stuff but merely point out that overlooking the tried and true is fools road. and yes advanced analytics ARE an excellent means of predicting the past
  14. the old school stuff is math too
  15. And one title to show for those 15 years. Almost like they had Aaron Rodgers as their ace pitcher. ZERO for the rays.
  16. analytics doesn't seem to care about them
  17. Use whatever you want. But the old school stuff is important too.
  18. hasn't done much for us. should I care about others?
  19. The difference between this team today and Twins teams 5-10 years ago is the what they have on the farm. Every year fans spend the whole spring wondering what the opening day 26 is gonna look like. We've over a month to go in the season and already nineteen guys not on the opening day roster have played on the big league club. Now look at the names. Guys like Julien, Wallner, Lewis, Varland and Balazovic. Now go back and look at the guys getting big league action 5-10 years ago. Names that would scare the s#@! of you: Bobby Wilson, Nik Turley, James Beresford, Tim Stauffer. We once got excited about Chris Collabelo. Night and day. We now bring up guys we look forward to seeing. And best of all, we have to go to Philly to see Jake Cave.
  20. Yep. Analytics that anyone can calculate. None of this MIT b#@!%#@.
  21. Haven't really won anything since "analytics" became a thing. Now Tampa Bay, that's a team that lives and dies by analytics and they've won--oops, nothing. But wait. The Dodgers. HUGE on the analytics deal. More money to spend on payroll than God. One (Covid tainted?) World Series win. A wise man once said that advanced analytics are an excellent means of predicting the past.
  22. I never said it is a "bad" stat just said that I don't have much use or time for it. Probably because I spend too much time attending all of the Twins parades since they've become so ensconced in the advanced analytics game. Or Tampa Bay parades. Can't forget the Dodgers parades since they've fallen on the altar AND had more payroll money than God. Bottom line is the bottom line. Advanced analytics are an excellent way of predicting the past.
  23. Carew, also, slightly.
  24. yawn. don't pretend to tell me what I "should" know. I don't give a c@!# about players "trying to create runs" what I care about is players "creating" runs.
×
×
  • Create New...