I didn't like that they basically gave up on Berrios. I mean he hasn't had a stellar season, but like you said with the front end of the rotation looking like Berrios and Gray I think we look a little better.
I always think back to the Johan Santana trade. In the long run, value wise, since Santana ended up blowing out his arm, I suppose the trade looks like it might have been a win for the Twins since they probably would have owed Santana money after his shoulder injury. But I know that the Twins had pretty good seasons in 2008, 2009, and 2010. What kind of difference would Santana have made on those Twins teams? Would it have been acceptable for the twins to have eaten a big portion of a Santana contract had they won the World Series in one of those 3 seasons?
Now I really hope the kids the Twins got for Berrios turns out to be good, but it seems as a lifelong twins fan that as soon as those guys get good they will trade them too, if they even turn out. It seems like the twins are more concerned about value in the future than winning for the moment. I mean there were 5 - 6 crappy seasons after the world series in 91. But would you guys have traded that 91 world series for 3 or 4 more division titles in the late 90's but losing in the first round of the playoff all of the time?
Just my opinion, but I think Berrios makes the rotation a lot more competitive this year. But I guess we have hope that the kids we got for Berrios become good. So we got that going for us.