Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

IndianaTwin

Verified Member
  • Posts

    6,315
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by IndianaTwin

  1. Good seats still available for Jenkins’ debut in Toledo. Edit: Likely because it’s “Stand on Your Head Night.” I hate smart phones with not-so-smart operators. I’ll try again later.
  2. If by 30-year-old, you mean that Larnach and Wallner will turn 30 in early and late 2027, sure.
  3. The Pirates haven’t yet missed out on an extra pick on Skenes. If he is top three in Cy Young voting before hitting arbitration, they can get the extra pick that way as well.
  4. Also wonder if part of "more controlled" is the better facilities that are going to come with moving to AAA.
  5. Another data point is Marco Raya. He was last year's "Can he stay healthy" project. They managed his workload carefully at Wichita. He started virtually every Friday night. First half of the year, he never threw more than 60 pitches. The last half they let him push 80 before rewarding him with a final start in St. Paul. This year they did virtually the same, but in St. Paul. He didn't go above 70 pitches until June 5, but since then has been allowed to go above 80 with some regularity and above 90 twice. He hasn't missed a start, though they've often given him an extra day or even two. After 97.2 innings a year ago, he's up to 80.1 with probably four or five starts remaining. The next step will be about actually being effective at St. Paul (6.27 ERA), but he just turned 23 this month, on average 5.7 years younger than the batters he's facing. It seems like their methodology has been effective in keeping Raya healthy, and they are following a similar pattern with Prielipp. He first hit 60 pitches on June 7 and was up to 76 on Aug. 13 before the promotion to AAA and 81 pitches on Tuesday night. It looks like he's only missed two starts plus the All-Star Break. He's a little older than Raya, so it probably makes sense to test him St. Paul. You can probably pencil him into the St. Paul rotation next spring for a Raya-type workload.
  6. And hmm. Slipped my mind that this is the week for the Kernels at South Bend. -(Northern) Indiana Twin PS: And now if the Fever could just get a certain No. 22 healthy for when I see their game with the Lynx on Friday night...
  7. About anything referencing that scene from Moneyball deserves being quoted. Good movie. Great scene. Another pretty significant difference is Low A players having to deal with a six-days-out-of-seven schedule for five months after spring training.
  8. Given that they only got 4.2 innings out of Castro over three seasons with a 5.79 ERA (91 ERA+), I'm hoping for a little more from Hatch.
  9. He only had 1.095 years of service entering the season. Am I missing something? EDIT to add, from MLB Trade Rumors: "This is Outman’s final minor league option year. He can back up Byron Buxton in center or spend the remainder of the season at Triple-A St. Paul. The Twins would need to decide whether to carry him on the Opening Day roster next season or expose him to waivers." So they have team control -- he's just not optionable.
  10. From the OP: "Including expected arbitration payouts, FanGraphs projects Minnesota's 2025 Opening Day payroll to be $66.8 million, which would be a $67.2 million decrease from its 2024 Opening Day payroll, which settled around $134 million." Huh? @Cody Schoenmann, how do you come up with a $66.8M payroll for 2025? Something isn't tracking. I'm not sure that figure even tracks for 2026. If Lopez/Buxton are $38M, the six guys who are arb-eligible got paid $15.7M this year and will certainly increase, and you still have to fill out the roster with 18 more guys getting pre-arb salaries.
  11. This is an interesting exercise. I'd started on a similar one. To add a level of exercise, when I made some guesses at arbitration figures, I came up with something in the neighborhood of $88-$90 million, plus the $10M for Correa. If a new owner were to come on board and make even a $130-$140M budget reasonable, it would be interesting to imagine what could happen. They've not spent much on relievers, so say judicious spending that totals $10M. They've signed Castro and then Vazquez, so say another $10M on a veteran catcher. Then another $20-$25M on a veteran hitter or three and I'm willing to roll the dice.
  12. Agreed. I'm guessing we also see more back-to-backs from Jeffers until (if) Vazquez returns.
  13. Do you mean the guy who made his first start since June 19 this past Saturday and threw only 31 pitches? That's not how rehab assignments are usually structured.
  14. From the "you-can't-tell-them-apart-without-a-scorecard" department, who am I missing in an inventory of Twins pitchers? Older guys on the 40-man or who've thrown a lot in the bullpen: Sands, Topa, Tonkin, Funderburk, Hatch, Ramirez, Kriske, Davis, Misiewicz, Urena, (also Duarte, McCaughan) Starting pitcher list: Ryan, Lopez, Ober, SWR, Matthews, Festa, Abel*, Bradley, Rojas. Multi-inning experiment guys: Prielipp, Raya, Morris, Adams, Ohl, Lewis, Baker*. Other: Canterino, Laweryson, MacLeod, Percival, Rozek. *Where's Charlie Delta?
  15. Houston needs to be a fast riser or Lewis needs an extension. The latter is a free agent after 2028.
  16. I'm fond of oversimplifying. For 2026, looking at guys in the system... Rotation: Ryan, Lopez, Ober, SWR, Matthews, Festa, Bradley, Abel, guys in minors. Bullpen: Diddly squat. Check that -- almost diddly squat, given that it's full-on audition time for Sands, Topa, Funderburk, Tonkin and a lot of guys I don't have committed to memory, including the "prospects" like Ohl, Prielipp, Lineup: Jeffers (C), __(backup)___ (C), Clemens (1b), Keaschall (2b), Lee (ss), Lewis (3b), Roden (lf), Buxton (cf), Wallner (rf), Larnach (dh), ___Julien?____, ____Martin?____, ___Outman?_____. Misc. hitters in the system who have played in the majors: Gasper, Fitzgerald, Kiersey, Bride, Miranda, McCusker. Minor leaguers: Rodriguez, Jenkins, Culpepper, Eales, Sabato, Gonzalez, Mendez, Olivar. -------------------- People are making the assumption that one or more of the starting pitchers will get traded. That only happens if there's no ownership change. If there's an ownership change, there's a very good likelihood it comes with spending. New owners are going to want to make a splash. So how much would it cost a new owner to make a splash? Try this for size... Second catcher: Operating on the model that Falvey has had a pair of three-year veteran contracts in Castro and Vazquez -- $10M Hitter 1: $15M Hitter 2: $10M Hitter 3: $5M The hitter list assumes that you have health and productivity from Buxton, Lewis, Lee, either Wallner or Larnach and that at least one of Wallner/Larnach, Roden, Outman takes a step forward. It also assumes that at least one of the rookies (led by Keaschall) makes a contribution. Reliever 1: $5M Reliever 2: $3M Reliever 3: $2M That's based on Falvey's reluctance to bid on relievers. It also assume that there's significant commitment to the convert-a-starter model of the guys already in the system. That's $50M in spending. That's a lot. But it's not a lot when the list of guys above the line probably costs about $85-$90M, taking into account arbitration and a lot of pre-arb guys at minimum salary or a bit more. Add $10M if you want to count the commitment to Correa. To me, it's not at all unfeasible to see a new owner drop $50M in new money. Or even $60M if they want to make their primary signing be a $20M hitter. I'll take the OP's premise that at this point, it's not a teardown.
  17. Also, in addition to not having the service time, the Twins would only get the extra pick if Keaschall was to win the Rookie of the Year or be in the top three in MVP voting before reaching arbitration.
  18. And also have less than 45 days of service time. I think he has eight, so if he’s down until about the 25th of August, that can well be a factor. Orioles fans will tell you that’s why Samuel Basallo is still down. They expect him up around the 20th of August.
  19. As I read the article in The Athletic, I interpreted it as mutual agreement that over the course of the contract, he’d age himself out of playing SS. Many on TD have similarly suggested the likelihood of a position switch at some point. I didn’t read his comments as antagonistic. I also read it as an ongoing conversation between him and the team regarding when the timing would be right, with no heir apparent yet on hand.
  20. Concur. The article also speaks to Correa’s role in the interactions between Baldelli and Jax following Wednesday’s. Even with Correa’s own situation with the team being uncertain, he helped initiate the conversation between Baldelli and Jax. In the article, Baldelli and Jax also each take ownership for parts of how the situation took part. The article also speaks well of Baldelli reaching out to Jax after Thursday’s trade. I said this within a different thread, but no matter what one thinks of Falvey’s and Baldelli’s decision making, I think they handle the human relations part of their role well. That’s an aspect we can’t see fully, since so much of it happens behind the scenes or is only reported through the media. We never know the whole story of how these discussions happen.
  21. In MLB.com's rankings, only one top-50 prospect was moved, period. The A's got Leo DeVries (No. 3), the highest-ranked prospect in their rankings to ever be moved at the deadline. MLB.com has Tait at 56 and Abel at 91. Adding Rojas, they also have the Twins getting Nos. 2, 3 and 6 among all prospects who were traded. https://www.mlb.com/news/mlb-clubs-with-biggest-hauls-at-trade-deadline-2025?t=mlb-pipeline-coverage A different mlb.com article calls the Twins' additions as the second-best haul of prospects. They say an argument could be made to call the Twins No. 1, but they gave the edge to the A's, solely based on DeVries. Six Twins acquisitions made it into the Twins' Top 30 (top 24, actually).
  22. I give Sands first opportunity to take a shot at closing.
×
×
  • Create New...