Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. I fall to see how people think this team is better next year with any certainty. Correa is likely gone. Why do people feel this team will be better, and the elite teams will be worse next year? They have a winning record in the bank this year. I really don't understand.
  2. Inflation is real in the NFL given the ever increasing revenue. Cousins looks like a bargain already.
  3. I'd deal many of the hitting prospects, just not those two pitchers for one pitcher.
  4. Stupid idea that's been discussed over and over for some reason.
  5. I wonder what Keith doesn't like about Winder? I mean, if he's not a starter, then I do this deal for sure.
  6. I'm not dealing Winder and Woods Richardson for one pitcher. I'm not sure I deal winder at all.... And I'm a trade for some help guy.
  7. They won the division two of the last three years. How many good years do they need before they aren't stumbling to success?
  8. And how would they be better next year? Or are you punting that already?
  9. Who is trading for CC? That he'd go to? Realistically.
  10. You think pitchers forgot what the coach said in one week? I have my doubts.
  11. Larnachs weak arm? Teams have already stopped running on him. Unreal.
  12. If acquiring a guy with 6 years of control isn't pipeline, we have a different meaning, but I get that.
  13. So Ryan, who was a rookie didn't count? This idea that they don't have a pipeline is ridiculous. Ryan, ober, smeltzer, winder, and a couple rookie RPs isn't enough to add in one year? I like chief, but expecting more than that is ridiculous. On topic, there is no guarantee next year is this good, how many years should they put off adding players while in first? They likely won't have CC, and Buxton had played way more games than previous years. Exactly how do the naysayers think this team is better next, and NY, Tor, Houston, et. al. are worse?
  14. No idea, but the coverage here has been excellent. Thanks. Me? I want the high risk, high ceiling, guys. Go for it.
  15. Thanks for all the great coverage on the site!
  16. I'd take him without hesitation, given all I know is what I've read, obviously....
  17. Odds were VERY HIGH the Twins score once they had two on and nobody out. So, he didn't add much to the odds of winning.
  18. His babip is incredibly low. So, yes.
  19. Buxton's bad luck continues. Hard hit, right at 'em.
  20. Love round abouts. We'll see if I feel that way after driving in Portugal soon.....
  21. At least 11 didn't knowingly leave a mass murderer alive and free, for a second time.
  22. Yup. The twins are league median offensively among MLB teams at catcher. I just checked. Actually, they are 11th..... I'd suggest that content is important when considering what would be done this year, and when judging the players.
×
×
  • Create New...