Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

DJL44

Verified Member
  • Posts

    9,232
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    60

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by DJL44

  1. He's a great value at the $5-7M range and quite tradeable in July if desired.
  2. It goes back a long time. In the early years, it was agreed that the home team shares the gate with the visitors (otherwise they wouldn't travel to the game at all). The other part is me reclassifying "local" TV money as "national" which acknowledges that there is no "local" in media in a post-cable, streaming landscape.
  3. Right now, the owners only get 52% of each local dollar spent and send the other 48% to the league. I'm proposing that all national revenue gets split evenly 30 ways (TV, radio, licensing, etc) and all gameday revenue gets kept locally. The overall percentage of shared revenue would be about the same as it is now but the incentive to put butts in seats would double overnight. Owners could cut ticket prices in half and make the same marginal revenue, or they could enhance the "gameday experience" (cheap beer?) or they could spend money to create a winning team. If overall baseball attendance goes up, that's a win. I don't really care about parity if MLB draws 7 million more fans to the ballpark (10% increase).
  4. Correct, incentives matter. 100% of locally generated revenue should to the team. If you don't want to spend, nobody will attend your games, use your parking lot or buy your concessions and you'll make less money. TV money doesn't ebb and flow with team success but attendance revenue correlates very well with trying to win. The only teams that draw well without winning are the Rockies and the Cubs and that's because it's a huge beer blast with a baseball game attached.
  5. The current Democrats are a bunch of Rockefeller Republicans. There aren't ANY communists in American politics. Bernie Sanders is a social democrat, which is a centrist in Europe.
  6. Yes, that is definitely true. If you're fast but throw lefthanded you're an OF. If you're not fast but can field grounders well you're a 1B. Keith Hernandez would have been a SS except he threw lefthanded.
  7. This is probably necessary. The Twins are never going to be successful if the Pohlads are using them as a piggy bank to fund their other business failures.
  8. The Twins could desperately use a mediocre SS and a mediocre 1B as well as a few mediocre relievers.
  9. If they draft one more their next one is free. It’s a CBA loophole that not many know about.
  10. I’d be pretty irritated if I had to endure a professional sports draft. What a horrible way to spend a weekend.
  11. Then I wouldn't get too obsessed that the Twins "didn't get a top 100 prospect". The Yankees got unranked Luis Gil for Jake Cave. 1/3 of the future top talent will spend time in the foreign rookie leagues. Quantity in prospects is a necessary hedge. If you want lower risk (only picking from AA and AAA players) you're going to give away potential upside.
  12. Dalton Rushing, River Ryan, Hyesong Kim, Justin Wrobleski, Bobby Miller - several interesting players who aren't on prospect lists anymore.
  13. It's the revenue sharing, not the salary cap. Adding a salary cap doesn't give the Tigers any additional resources. MLB already has a soft cap in the luxury tax system that forces more revenue sharing dollars to the smaller market teams. Take that away and they'll have even LESS revenue. OTOH - if they get the incentives right for revenue sharing, they don't need a salary cap at all.
  14. Load it up by trading Buxton, Jeffers, Lopez, Ryan and Ober. Then load it up more by drafting high for the next two seasons.
  15. At a minimum Buxton should insist that his $2.5M in yearly plate appearance bonuses turn into guaranteed money. He's less likely to hit those bonuses on a contender with a stacked lineup. That would make his remaining contract 3 years / $52.5M. Plate Appearances: $2.5M total 502: $500k 533: $500k 567: $500k 600: $500k 625: $500k
  16. If Buxton didn't have a no-trade clause he'd already be gone. He's been injury-prone for his entire career and now he's 32. The Twins aren't going to win for the next two seasons and by the time they could put a good team together again Buxton will be 34 and a pending free agent.
  17. Version 2.0 after the Winter Meetings could look like this: Rotation: Ober, Bradley, Woods Richardson, Abel, Matthews Bullpen: mostly the same OF: Martin, Roden, Rodriguez, Wallner, Outman IF: mostly the same C: Austin Jackson, Reese McGuire
  18. True, but they're also trying to get those same guys from the Mets for Joe Ryan.
  19. The Twins are probably better off dealing a piece to each team. Buxton to the Dodgers, Jeffers to the Phillies, Ryan or Lopez to the Mets.
  20. I don't think Byron Buxton will return two top-100 prospects. He's making $15M a year. One top prospect and one lower ranked prospect is more likely. I think the Reds are the least likely of these teams. They need the prospects more than the other four teams.
  21. They're not "right sizing" the payroll to pay down the debt? Could have fooled me.
  22. Ok. So they placed bad bets and lost $500M in a bull market and now the Twins fans of Minnesota need to suffer because of their bad business decisions. I don’t think Bernie Madoff hurt the Mets that badly.
  23. Even if they got a top 20 prospect (Sam Basallo, Nolan McLean, Jesus Made, Bryce Eldridge, Colt Emerson, Andrew Painter), I'd be asking for another prospect as a throw-in. I thought the Reds were fools to trade Sonny Gray straight up for Chase Petty.
×
×
  • Create New...