Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

arby58

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,516

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by arby58

  1. arby58
    Ryan gave up the seventh most home runs of any pitcher in MLB in 2023. I understand starting pitchers will dominate that stat, but I highly doubt he was close to league average.
  2. arby58
    Through the end of June, Ryan had a 3.44 ERA. while Gray's was 2.67. Ryan's was better than Lopez' 4.24, but not really in Gray's stratosphere. The real problem, which I alluded to, was keeping the ball in the ballpark. Through the end of June, he'd given up 13 HRs. Gray 3.
  3. arby58
    The point that Ober went from 70 to 170 innings pitched is well taken. I won't trust Ryan as a number two starter until he gets another quality pitch so he can drop his fast ball usage to something under 50 percent - preferably increased command of the sweeper. That will keep more of his pitches from landing in the left and right field seats.
  4. arby58
    You're 10/10 on the 2023 postseason Sonny Gray who gave up 5 runs (4 earned), 8 hits (2 of which left the yard), in 4 innings pitched against Houston? THAT Sonny Gray?
  5. arby58
    He's out of options - if there is really a team out there that wants him (I highly doubt it), they'll wait for waivers.
  6. arby58
    Except Martin is three years younger and can be expected to improve. He's had three years in the minors - Gordon has had SEVEN. Also, if you total Gordon's various years OPS at AAA, it is less than Martin's last year. I just don't get why you want to ride this dog. If Martin isn't the answer, there is somebody out there better they can pick up who is better than Gordon.
  7. arby58
    Every year is something, and last year for Gordon was horrible. Yes, he had that 114+ OPS in 2022, but the problem with Gordon is he never was that great in the minor leagues either (the difference between he and Miranda). His best OPS in the minors was .801, and the rest were middle .700s and .600s. No power, bad strikeout to walks ratio. It makes 2022 look more like a fluke than a likely recurrence. There's a reason he's 27 and out of options.
  8. arby58
    OK, IF that happens I will go along with your suggestion (except they will likely need at least 7 SPs for the season, so I'm talking myself out of it).
  9. arby58
    Gordon has a 1.4 WAR over almost 700 at bats, he strikes out more than 5 times as many as he walks, he has little power and not a great throwing arm for the outfield. He also had a negative WAR last year - he is the epitome of a marginal MLB player. I don't 'get' why the Twins, if they have a need in centerfield (which is not a natural position for him anyway) can't find the equivalent at about the same salary. This is not one of those 'in case of emergency break glass' situations.
  10. arby58
    If that's the case, who is the number 5 starter? So far, I'm not excited about getting the Twins successfully through 5 or 6 innings every fifth day. When you already have 3 decent high leverage right handers in the BP, it feels like the starting rotation is a bigger need.
  11. arby58
    Wallner is perfectly capable of playing LF (or Larnach, if he can hit enough). I see them trading Polanco (who has more trade value and is less necessary at 2B) and keeping Kepler (who still plays decent RF and was arguably their best hitter second half of last year). If they're going to invest $, my guess is it is a trade for a SP with a pretty big salary for 2024.
  12. arby58
    The discussion isn't about 'a weapon out of the pen' but an innings eater in low/medium leverage situations. Unless you think Duran/Jax/Stewart isn't enough for right-handed leverage situations, then, IMHO you're not getting enough out of Varland in the Pagan role.
  13. arby58
    He's young enough and his stuff too good to relegate to that role. He should start or be a high leverage relief pitcher. The fact that the Twins may have enough of the high leverage arms already suggests he stays in the rotation.
  14. arby58
    If he's 27 years old and can't make the 26 man roster, the fact he is out of options strikes me as not particularly relevant. I'd expect most 27 year old marginal players to be out of options. If you lose something of little particular value 'for nothing' there isn't really a loss, in the material sense of the word.
  15. arby58
    I have him over Gordon as well - and don't understand the belief that he and Castro both need to be utility role players on the 2024 roster. There are plenty of things that are off-putting about Gordon - lack of power, not a strong outfield throwing arm, very few walks, quite a few strikeouts. Even in his 'breakout' 2022 season, his OPS was petty close to league average at .743. Granted, his OPS+ was 111, but then let's talk about last year, which was a disaster, even before he got hurt. Sure, he offers positional flexibility, but he's 27, so the Twins pretty much know what he is. With a 1.4 WAR in nearly 700 at bats, that's not a lot.
  16. arby58
    They had Taylor and didn't need him in centerfield last year. It wasn't that long ago (2021) that Kepler played 164 innings in centerfield. I don't think he has lost that much mobility to make him 'terribly terribly not according to plan' to be in centerfield if needed.
  17. arby58
    The Twins have greater needs than second base, where Julien and Lee are on the rise. Polanco's two years of team control make him a valuable trade chip. It's not (only) about payroll, but when you have cheap replacements with at least a reasonable chance of performing as well or better (remember the Polanco injury issues), it makes sense to trade him. Of course, they will not give him away, but if he is the centerpiece of a trade for a decent starting pitcher, it works for me.
  18. arby58
    I see it differently. Turning the rule 5 draft into a sort of lottery where everybody can 'win big' doesn't seem to right any injustices to me. Meanwhile, the team that originally drafted or signed the player, developed him for several years, now must make an earlier judgement on their ultimate ability. I'm not seeing the point of that, from the perspective of improving the overall product. IF the Twins had not protected Rodriguez last year and he was lost and went on to become a huge star, how would Twins fans react to that? I think it good for players to come up through a system, and, as a fan, I get more enjoyment out of that than a game of minor league musical chairs.
  19. arby58
    The minor league portion of the Rule 5 draft does serve that purpose, and the Twins were active there.
  20. arby58
    The answer is in - no Twin was taken in today's Rule 5 draft.
  21. arby58
    I'm trying to find the team that is (a) looking for a back-up centerfielder, and (b) willing to take a flier on a guy who has never had breakout numbers in the minors, and (c) going to keep him on the MLB roster for an entire season. Haven't found one. I guess we'll find out - I highly doubt it.
  22. arby58
    Petty was toward the end of the first round and a high school pitcher - I wouldn't project that out to 'would trade any prospects for a position of need.' I 'get' the point of 'what if it were Acuna/Robert/etc.' but we're talking realistic trades here.
  23. arby58
    My 'untouchable' list, even before seeing the article, was Lopez, Lewis, and Jenkins - with Duran (who closes?) and Jeffers (who catches?) and maybe Rodriguez close behind (i.e., offer would have to blow you away). I sort of 'get' the point about Ryan - he's likely to be a solid #3 starter for a long time, and I'm not sure you'd get anything more than that back in a trade. Other than that, keeping in mind obvious points (don't trade both Lee and Julien, for example), I'd say the rest is negotiable.
  24. arby58
    Maeda was a Cy Young candidate in the COVID-shortened 2020, over 66.2 innings. Maeda's first year he threw 175.2 innings; since then, 134.1, 125.1, 153.2, 66.2, 106.1, 0, 104.1. I don't think 'dominated' is a word you would use for Maeda other than the 66.2 innings of 2020. His yearly ERAs have been 3.48, 4.22, 3.81, 4.04, 2.70 (dominant year), 4.66, 4.23. That said, the career ERA is 3.93 - yes, he is/was a good pitcher, but he is also going to be 36 years old in April 2024. Paddock has a lot more upside potential.
  25. arby58
    I agree with you that quality pitching is necessary in the post-season, which was why Gray's start against Houston was so disappointing - it was right there for the taking for the Twins. I also agree about Paddock - he has that 'eye of the tiger' look to him. I think he has a chip on his shoulder and is wanting to prove he is a quality MLB pitcher. He certainly has the stuff. Yes, pitching much more than, say, Maeda's 2023 innings may be a challenge. If the Twins can pick up a decent starting pitcher who can provide 150-180 innings, things should be just fine.
×
×
  • Create New...