Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • How Does Walker Jenkins Fit with This Front Office's History of Top Draft Picks?


    Nick Nelson

    In the seventh draft since Derek Falvey took over and transformed their front office, the Minnesota Twins selected high school outfielder Walker Jenkins out of North Carolina at fifth overall. 

    How does this pick track against other players the Twins have selected with their first choice in the draft under Falvey and Co.?

    Image courtesy of Jeffrey Becker, Nathan Ray Seebeck, Ken Blevens – USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    At a basic level, most people in MLB front offices would likely agree that "Best Player Available" is a proper guiding principle for the amateur draft. It's a smart approach to drafting in any sport, really, but especially one with such lengthy, circuitous, and unpredictable development timelines. 

    With that said, determining the "Best Player Available" is not so straightforward in practice. After a certain early point in the first round, this assessment becomes very subjective, and even at the highest picks, opinions tend to vary wildly about who is better than who. Moreover, you have different organizational metrics and evaluation systems, different priorities, and different strategies in play.

    The bottom line: looking back at players chosen with the highest-stakes draft picks can tell you a lot about a front office's philosophies. Reviewing how those decisions have panned out can be telling in terms of how effective these philosophies have been, and what lessons might be carried forward.

    Is the Walker Jenkins selection reflective of an adaptive front office evolving its mentality? Or are they merely following their usual blueprint? Let's run it back to the start and see what patterns or takeaways we can find.

    Top Twins Draft Picks Under the Falvey/Levine Front Office
    2017: Royce Lewis, SS (1st overall)
    By virtue of joining the reigning worst team in the major leagues, Derek Falvey inherited the No. 1 overall pick in the first draft he would oversee as Chief Baseball Officer. Quite a welcoming gift.

    The top of the that class was a fascinating one. Sometimes there is a clear-cut No. 1 pick, sometimes there are two or three guys who could reasonably be the choice. In 2017, there were a handful of plausible options. Lewis was among them, but generally considered lower in that mix.

    Two-way player hysteria was taking over in the face of Shohei Ohtani's looming stateside arrival. There was a pair of talents billed as such at the top of the 2017 draft class: Louisville's Brendan McKay and high school phenom Hunter Greene

    To the extent there was a consensus choice for the top pick, it was probably Greene. He would've been an exciting addition as a teenager throwing in triple digits along with that trendy two-way potential. Alas, that also made for a highly experimental path, and a costly one to boot with Greene expected to command a big signing bonus.

    The Twins opted for Lewis in a move that preserved draft pool funds for a later splash. (They took prep pitcher and LSU commit Blayne Enlow in the third round, and signed him overslot with the leftover budget.) 

    Interestingly, they used their second pick, which was essentially a late first-rounder at No. 35 overall, to select college slugger Brent Rooker – a much "safer" draft pick after dominating higher-level competition at Mississippi State.

    Takeaways:

    • While the Twins would later develop a reputation for highly preferring college players in the draft under Falvey, the first and most significant draft selection under his regime was a high schooler. Take note of this.
    • They did, however, aim to offset the volatility of a raw prep talent with their first pick by adding a more polished college slugger shortly after. Take note of that also.
    • Six years after being drafted with the No. 1 and 2 overall picks, Greene and Lewis are still working to establish themselves as big-leaguers: Greene has thrown 199 MLB innings, Lewis has accrued a whole 140 plate appearances. This despite the fact that both have mostly delivered on their promise when healthy and on the field. A reminder that with high school prospects – even the small percentage who don't fizzle out – it can take a while.

    2018: Trevor Larnach, OF (20th overall)
    In the second draft under the new regime, Minnesota went back to the Rooker profile with their first pick. Larnach was an established collegiate masher who featured on a star-studded, national champion Oregon State team. There were no illusions about Larnach being a defensive maven or future batting champ. He was drafted for his proven power at the highest amateur level, which theoretically made him a low-risk pick in the second half of the first round. 

    Looking back, that assessment was ... pretty accurate? It's definitely fair to say the 26-year-old Larnach has fulfilled the "high floor" part of his scouting report. He can hit. He has a .292/.379/.463 career slash line in the minors and a respectable career OPS+ of 93 in the majors. 

    Has he hit enough to justify regular MLB playing time at a bat-first position? Not really, as evidenced by his current presence in Triple-A. 

    Then again, neither had Rooker at age 26. Now he's an All-Star at 28.

    Takeaways:

    • College bats like Larnach might be appealing for their ostensible quicker path to the majors, but it doesn't always work out that way. Rooker took every bit as long as Lewis to find his footing in the majors. Larnach's breakout might still be ahead, five years in.
    • We probably shouldn't be super hasty to give up on Trevor Larnach? 

    2019: Keoni Cavaco, SS (13th overall)
    This pick seemingly went against the organization's scruples. Not only was Cavaco an unrefined prep talent out of high school, he was also generally viewed as a reach this high in the first round. (Cavaco ranked 28th on MLB Pipeline's pre-draft board.) The Twins had scouted him heavily and bought into their favorable assessment of his tools and potential.

    “I think upside is the right word to use here.” scouting director Sean Johnson said at the time. “He’s got electric bat speed. We think he’s going to have home run power. He’s one of the best third basemen I’ve seen in the high school ranks in my time scouting, and most of the guys who saw him -- that’s including guys that’s done it 20-plus years -- so a great defender.”

    Most great infield defenders don't play third base in high school. Never mind. Like so many other promising high school players who enamor scouts with their conceptual ceiling, Cavaco didn't reach his. In fact, he has never come close. He's had no success in the pros and currently has a .544 OPS at Single-A as a 22-year-old, on the verge of fizzling out of the system. 

    In this draft, as they did two years earlier when they took a high schooler with their top selection, the Twins aimed for some level of assurance in their next two picks, going with college slugger Matt Wallner (39th overall) and college fireballer Matt Canterino (54th overall).

    Takeaways:

    • Toolsy teenaged high schoolers are risky, especially near the top of the draft – even when they amaze with their tantalizing potential against prep competition. Cavaco is shaping up as a banner example; he might not even make it Double-A.
    • While the Twins were showing a willingness to gamble on prep picks in the draft, they also were noticeably balancing those gambles out with college standouts in the following selections.

    2020: Aaron Sabato, 1B (27th overall)
    The Twins picked near the end of the first round in 2020 due to their 101-win season the prior year. This was a weird draft – because of COVID, it was cut down to five rounds, and teams had relatively little data to evaluate the class. 

    Under the circumstances, Minnesota opted for what they viewed as the safe pick to pan out into something of substance. Like Larnach and Rooker, Sabato was a proven college slugger seemingly poised for a quick path to the majors on the strength of his bat alone. 

    Unfortunately, we've witnessed the downside of a one-dimensional, strikeout-prone slugger who doesn't slug. (Sound familiar?) The Twins liked his offensive profile, in part, because of advanced metrics. (Sound familiar?) "If you look at him analytically, he lined up with some of the guys that went at the very top of the board," said Johnson at the time.

    While patience and power have kept his numbers afloat, Sabato has never dominated pro pitching as hoped. He owns a .785 OPS through two-and-a-half minor-league seasons, and is currently batting .226 with a 34% K-rate as a 24-year-old at Double-A. 

    Takeaways:

    • Again: there is no such thing as a safe bet in the MLB Draft. Even the apparent sure-thing bat – drafted solely for that purpose, already at the bottom of the defensive spectrum – can fail to figure it out against professional pitching. 
    • Probably not a good idea to use a first-rounder on a position player with zero likelihood of offering any defensive value at any point. 

    2021: Chase Petty, RHP (26th overall)
    Another division-winning season in 2020 left the Twins drafting late in the first round again. This time, they reversed course dramatically from the prior year's strategy – from collegiate slugger to prep pitcher. High school arms are notoriously the most high-risk proposition for a top draft pick, and it's a profile the Twins have resolutely avoided with their highest picks under Falvey.

    Petty was a big exception, due in large part to his big fastball. While reaching triple digits as a high schooler might not have been as novel as it was four years earlier when Hunter Greene was doing it, Petty had plenty of steam behind him and flashed impressive stuff during a brief pro debut.

    That was enough to sell the Cincinnati Reds on him. They flipped Sonny Gray to Minnesota for Petty in a one-for-one swap, securing the Twins a frontline starter who's made a huge impact over two seasons. 

    In many ways, for a team that fancies itself in immediate contention mode, this is the most ideal use of a late-first-round pick you could ask for. 

    Takeaways:

    • Major-league teams like upside. Would the Twins have enticed Cincinnati if they'd instead selected and offered some 22-year-old college pitcher, or run-of-the-mill high school shortstop? Maybe. I kind of doubt it. The allure of age and projection adds a lot of shine to young pitching prospects.
    • Sometimes it's good to sell high on these assets when the shine is still there. Sometimes that comes back to haunt you. While the Twins have certainly gotten back a lot of value on this pick already, it may ultimately be another we look back at with dread. 

    2022: Brooks Lee, SS (8th overall)
    I think most Twins officials would agree that, among all draft picks covered on this list, Lee was the least difficult choice. Possessing a top 10 pick for the first time since Falvey took over, the team had eyes on Lee but didn't figure he would fall to them at No. 8. When he did, the decision was a no-brainer. 

    Lee is a pretty prototypical first-round draft pick: standout collegiate shortstop with a chance to stick at the position. This profile offers a nice mix of polish and floor with upside and ceiling. Surprisingly, he was the first (and only) player of this ilk that the Twins have drafted under this front office. In fact, it's the first such player they've drafted since 2011 when they took Levi Michael, who could aptly be described as Brooks Lee Lite. Outside of Lee and Michael, the Twins haven't taken a college infielder in the first round in almost 30 years ago, when they took Todd Walker out of LSU in 1994. 

    Michael was emblematic of the downside in these types; he had already basically reached his ceiling when the Twins drafted him. Walker better represented the upside – a readymade impact player – and he's probably a better comp for Lee, given that he too was taken with the eighth overall pick.

    Takeaways:

    • Due to preference or circumstance, the Twins have been really averse to drafting college infielders in the first round! 
    • In the MLB draft, things fall where they may and sometimes you have to take what you're given. That looks to have worked out well for the Twins last year. As for this year... 

    2023: Walker Jenkins, OF (5th overall)
    For months leading up to this year's draft, consensus solidified around five distinct standout talents atop the class. The three college stars were likely to be off the board by the time Minnesota's selection swung around at No. 5, leaving them with the proposition of taking whichever prep outfielder was left, or pivoting to a different strategy.

    The Twins chose not to get cute. And that shouldn't surprise anyone. As we've seen while going through this review, the idea that Minnesota's current front office heavily favors college players is pretty off-base. They have used all of their highest-stakes picks on high-school players. Jenkins is merely a continuation of that trend.

    This front office has amassed lefty-hitting outfielders, having added Larnach and Wallner with previous first-rounders. And it's an affinity that predates the current regime. In recent Twins draft history, Jenkins best approximates Alex Kirilloff, who was taken 15th overall in 2016, just before Falvey took over.

    A good reminder that while Falvey now ultimately calls the shots, scouting director Sean Johnson runs the draft, and he's a carryover from the previous regime. Some old habits die hard. The Twins love drafting high-school outfielders in the first round and frankly it ain't hard to see why.

    Of the six prep outfielders the Twins have drafted since the turn of the century – Denard Span (2002), Chris Parmelee (2006), Ben Revere (2007), Aaron Hicks (20008), Byron Buxton (2012), and Kirilloff (2016) – all six have reached the major leagues. A six-for-six hit rate. That just doesn't happen in the crapshoot known as the MLB Draft.

    Jenkins seems to blend the best of many worlds from the history of Twins drafts. He offers the exhilarating upside of an ascendant teenaged talent, in a historically safe profile. And the team didn't go out on a limb one bit to draft him. 

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Interesting review, thanks! Lewis and Lee have a chance to be very good, anyway. I still hope Larnach and Wallner can be solid major leaguers (and Enlow might have a role as well).

    In addition to Lewis and Greene and McKay, the other two top names in 2017 were Kyle Wright and Mackenzie Gore. McKay was cut in December 2022, doesn't appear to be signed anywhere. Only appeared in the majors during 2019. Gore looks like he has a chance, but is somewhat behind Greene (who looks like he could be solid or better going forward).

    Wright had that amazing 21-5 record with 180 IP, 130 ERA+ last year, after four years with a total of 80 MLB innings. This year he's been on the injured list twice with shoulder problems.

    Looking farther down the draft- wow, there's a lot of guys with very little accomplished in the majors. The first regular is Keston Hiura (pick #9). Jake Rogers (pick #11) is hitting fairly well this year. Clarke Schmidt (#16) has been OK filling in for all the injured Yankee pitchers. Then you get to Tanner Houck (#24), Nate Pearson (#28), Alex Lange (#30), and Drew Rasmussen (#31), all of whom look like they've got a shot at being MLB pitchers for a while. There are a bunch of 27-yr-old college pitchers who might be able to stick around for a while but no one where you think wow, why didn't we draft X?

    Just a quick glance at 2019, which is far from a closed book- some real players taken ahead of Cavaco. That top group in 2019 is definitely outperforming the 2017 group at the moment. After Cavaco-  well, Bryson Stott or Corbin Carroll would look really good right now.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Need to get Lewis in lineup!!! Once he is look out! What about Lee-it’s time to bring him up! Any chance of draft picks this year as well? Or next year-our draft was best in league and need to get them on twins asap 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Does the scouting department choose which players the Twins pick in their drafts or is there some general guidance for types of players? I have no idea about how the Twins make their choices.

    Players like Rooker, Larnach, Wallner, and Sabato are fine as a part of an organization. The problem arises when the balance of types tips too heavily away from athleticism.

    The future of the Twins will largely depend on guys like Lewis, Lee (who dropped in lat year's draft), and Jenkins (ping pong luck) along with how the pitcher's develop. 

    Walker Jenkins needs to reach his potential but it was the only sane choice in a year where two high school bats were identified a year ago as among the top five players to be drafted. Skenes had a big year and replaced Dollander who lost his slider among the top group, who were seen as quite separate from the rest. As always, time will tell who can make it in pro ball. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If we cannot win a playoff series, let alone a playoff game, over our two years with Gray, the Petty trade may need to be added to the annals of all time Falvey screw ups. And with Lewis continually hurt, two years of Gray is the most production Falvey & Co have produced out of their first round picks.  The record to date in Round One is not great. Let’s just hope they don’t screw up Lee and Jenkins

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It definitely takes a lot of luck to be successful in the amateur draft!! I believe Lee will be on the Varsity team next year! Either out of training camp or mid may as we are notorious for manipulating service time. I wish they would promote Lee to AAA yesterday and Varsity for a playoff run this Sept/Oct.  I’d bet serious $$$ that Walker Jenkins and Charlee Soto will be the best of the best of MN draft picks turned MLB stars that were taken early in the drafts.  Thank god they didnt go with another Sabato type and instead went with Soto!!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Nice summary Nick.  It is clear to me that the team is NOT locked into a single strategy which IMO is a good thing.  They need to be flexible and adjust to what each draft brings to them.  There is no right or wrong way as we have seen.

    On a side note... Cincy may be shining if Greene and Petty eventually become their top two starting pitchers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, dxpavelka said:

    "All six have made it to the big leagues."  How many of those six have lived up to expectations?

     

    • Denard Span (2002) - excellent career, including several all-star quality seasons
    • Chris Parmelee (2006) - AAAA player
    • Ben Revere (2007) - decent MLB player who proved how empty batting average can be; terrible arm but good fielder
    • Aaron Hicks (2008) - quality MLB player before injuries sapped his value
    • Byron Buxton (2012) - all-star player, limited by injury
    • Kirilloff (2016) - finally healthy and showing a good bat (limited defender)

    YMMV on how many have lived up to expectations; Span has by pretty much any measure, Parmelee did not. What were the expectations for Revere? Don't think he was ever pegged as a future all-star, but he was a useful player and netted us a quality reliever. It's unfortunate that Hicks didn't figure it out as a Twin, but that doesn't change the fact that he became a quality starter, well above average in NY. Buxton has actually been an all-star and played like one quite a bit, but the injuries have cost him both time and production: how much forgiveness do you have for injuries? Kirilloff was pegged as a potential all-star because of his bat, and he's finally starting to show  that at the MLB level. But it's possible the wrist problems may prevent him from ever having as much power as he'd need to be an all-star. Still looks like a quality player when healthy.

    So that's the real question: how much to you put on injuries when weighing expectations? From a draft perspective, it's nigh-impossible to predict for the vast majority of players whether they will be healthy or not as pros. (not all the time: Canterino certainly had warning signs, etc) the last 3 of the HS outfielders on this list have all flashed the talent that made them first-round picks, but for all of them injuries have gotten in the way. I think it's fair to say it's really the only thing that's gotten in the way for all three of them. 

    It's also notable that with the exception of Buxton, none of these guys were top 5 picks. Several were in the 20s, and outside of Buxton the next highest pick was at 14. Getting all six to MLB (and all of them made it to MLB with the Twins) does suggest that the talent evaluation and development process wasn't bad.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    27 minutes ago, Nashvilletwin said:

    If we cannot win a playoff series, let alone a playoff game, over our two years with Gray, the Petty trade may need to be added to the annals of all time Falvey screw ups. 

    I'm not sure that's even possible. That is an example of a trade for now, understanding the Petty has a big upside and could be great in a few years. 

    The reality is the Gray has been good for the most part. He deserved being an All Star this year. He did his part. How the Twins do in a season or in the 80% of games that Gray doesn't pitch in have to be a factor. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Seth Stohs said:

    I'm not sure that's even possible. That is an example of a trade for now, understanding the Petty has a big upside and could be great in a few years. 

    The reality is the Gray has been good for the most part. He deserved being an All Star this year. He did his part. How the Twins do in a season or in the 80% of games that Gray doesn't pitch in have to be a factor. 

    Twins are 3-10 in his starts since May 1.

    But you’re 100% correct. Gray has done his job. No knock on him. He gives it his all as well. Nothing but respect.

    My point is more of the overall strategy of foregoing the potential upside to chase a more immediate goal.  Certainly the strategy has merit; it just simply has not worked out on an overall basis for the current regime. With overall better performance by the team, that trade could have been viewed as an incredible deal.

    Hindsight is 20-20.  But at this exact moment - essentially 1.5 seasons of ball since that trade -  I’d take Steer, CES and Petty over Mahle and Gray.  I get it - you pay your money and you take your chances.  But the results are still the results and the possible huge long term future asset of Petty was lost without the required overall success it should have returned.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Come on. Are we really going to keep complaining about the Gray trade? He's been what the Twins need......for more than 1 year in the bigs. It is a good, fair, trade. Or should the present just be punted for the future all the time? Seriously this line of thinking really confuses me. 

    As for the picks, maybe they could take a look at the one dimensional guys and see a pattern in outcomes? Suggesting Rooker is "good" or whatever by mentioning he's an All Star ignores he's been awful since April. Simply awful. He's an All Star because every team has to have one. 

    There is some stuff to like in these picks, and some stuff not to like. The Lewis/Greene/McKay picks? None of them have worked, and they were nearly the consensus top three that year, so not sure how to judge the FO on that one.

    The Cavacao pick? Good golly miss molly, how awful is that looking? It looked bad at the time.....now? Worse than bad.

    I don't know anyone cannot love the last two top picks, though. Sure helps to have a top five or so pick........

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

    Lee is a pretty prototypical first-round draft pick: standout collegiate shortstop with a chance to stick at the position. This profile offers a nice mix of polish and floor with upside and ceiling. Surprisingly, he was the first (and only) player of this ilk that the Twins have drafted under this front office. In fact, it's the first such player they've drafted since 2011 when they took Levi Michael, who could aptly be described as Brooks Lee Lite. Outside of Lee and Michael, the Twins haven't taken a college infielder in the first round in almost 30 years ago, when they took Todd Walker out of LSU in 1994. 

    This part is really surprising to me.  If they have always loved toolsy high school outfielders one would think they would love toolsy shortstop types that eventually filter to the outfield.  Not just this FO but going back 20 years and not limited to the first round either.  It may be changing recently with the CES, Ross, Schoebel, Keashall types.

    I would personally be stocking my system with those types, then sort them out and try to keep the good ones.  Trade the ones that flash and hope you can scout your own.  The org is changing from a draft and develop to an asset management org and we will not likely see 20 years of the 1st round at any position again.  Gutting the 2021 draft in trades is a whole new Twins Territory. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I do not follow draft picks and rarely pay any attention to AAA (last time was over 40 years ago) but I will probably keep on eye on Walker hoping he is the Twins version of De La Cruz.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    48 minutes ago, RpR said:

    I do not follow draft picks and rarely pay any attention to AAA (last time was over 40 years ago) but I will probably keep on eye on walker hoping he is the Twins version of De La Cruz.

    Assuming you mean Bryan De La Cruz and yes it would be great if Wallner could be like him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    46 minutes ago, TwinsDr2021 said:

    Assuming you mean Bryan De La Cruz and yes it would be great if Wallner could be like him.

    No I mean Elly De La Cruz.

    Wallners ship has long sailed, but Walker could be the first Twins rookie to be full time before he is 23 if Good Fortune and ability is on his side.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, RpR said:

    No I mean Elly De La Cruz.

    Wallners ship has long saild, but Walker could be the first Twins rookie to be full time before he is 23 if Good Fortune and ability is on his side.

    Sorry mis-read, yes I hope he does, that would be AWESOME!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Torii Hunter is another 1rst round OF hit as was Kirby Puckett.  
     

    I was sad when we traded Petty because he seemed like Berrios replacement.  The drafted pitcher you want to see succeed.  Enlow is another.  But I still think the trade of Petty for Gray was a good trade.  If Petty comes up and has a development year then 5 good ones with Cincinnati we still break even considering the present value of the trade and that Gray did everything and more he was brought over here to do.  If he signs a 3 year 60 million extension that would be nice.  
     

    one thing I have noticed is we are seeing more of our drafted players reach the majors.  The thought process from Andy MacPhail former Twins GM is that the goal is for the Twins to develop 2-3 players a season to the majors and we are doing that.  Though Baltimore (Cano, Tyler) Cincinnati (Steer and CES and eventually Petty) and almost Detroit (Baddoo and I guess Goodrum though not with team anymore) also benefitting. 
     

    Our farm system got a lot stronger with this draft.  I am excited to see where our system ranks now.  Though we did just graduate 2 top 100 prospects (Julien and Lewis).  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, jmlease1 said:
    • Denard Span (2002) - excellent career, including several all-star quality seasons
    • Chris Parmelee (2006) - AAAA player
    • Ben Revere (2007) - decent MLB player who proved how empty batting average can be; terrible arm but good fielder
    • Aaron Hicks (2008) - quality MLB player before injuries sapped his value
    • Byron Buxton (2012) - all-star player, limited by injury
    • Kirilloff (2016) - finally healthy and showing a good bat (limited defender)

    YMMV on how many have lived up to expectations; Span has by pretty much any measure, Parmelee did not. What were the expectations for Revere? Don't think he was ever pegged as a future all-star, but he was a useful player and netted us a quality reliever. It's unfortunate that Hicks didn't figure it out as a Twin, but that doesn't change the fact that he became a quality starter, well above average in NY. Buxton has actually been an all-star and played like one quite a bit, but the injuries have cost him both time and production: how much forgiveness do you have for injuries? Kirilloff was pegged as a potential all-star because of his bat, and he's finally starting to show  that at the MLB level. But it's possible the wrist problems may prevent him from ever having as much power as he'd need to be an all-star. Still looks like a quality player when healthy.

    So that's the real question: how much to you put on injuries when weighing expectations? From a draft perspective, it's nigh-impossible to predict for the vast majority of players whether they will be healthy or not as pros. (not all the time: Canterino certainly had warning signs, etc) the last 3 of the HS outfielders on this list have all flashed the talent that made them first-round picks, but for all of them injuries have gotten in the way. I think it's fair to say it's really the only thing that's gotten in the way for all three of them. 

    It's also notable that with the exception of Buxton, none of these guys were top 5 picks. Several were in the 20s, and outside of Buxton the next highest pick was at 14. Getting all six to MLB (and all of them made it to MLB with the Twins) does suggest that the talent evaluation and development process wasn't bad.

    All-star "quality" season(s) for Span notwithstanding, 6 guys ONE all star game.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...