Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    How Low Could the Minnesota Twins' Payroll Go?

    Examining Minnesota’s potential budget cuts and the reality of a lean offseason brings the worst-case scenario into clearer focus.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of © Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    The Minnesota Twins enter this offseason facing a familiar but unsettling question: how low will ownership let payroll go? After consecutive disappointing seasons and amid shrinking local TV revenues, the front office is navigating a financial landscape far different from the one that fueled their 2023 postseason run. The organization has long operated with a mid-market mindset, but the tone this winter suggests a more dramatic pullback could be on the way.

    Across baseball, payroll flexibility has become a buzzword, often serving as a polite way of saying “spend less.” For the Twins, that 'flexibility' could turn into a euphemism for rigidity and constraint. With ownership hinting at reductions and early projections showing significant cuts, fans are bracing for a quieter offseason. While Minnesota has never been a major spender, it’s rare for the franchise to face such visible belt-tightening following years of on-field progress and roster investment.

    FanGraphs’s Jon Becker, who manages the site’s Roster Resource payroll pages, recently outlined just how far things could theoretically fall. His analysis underscores a point many around baseball have suspected: while the Twins aren’t headed for a complete teardown, ownership’s directive could push the payroll into uncomfortable territory.

    The Current Payroll Picture
    FanGraphs currently projects Minnesota’s payroll at roughly $95 million, a steep decline from last year’s $136 million. That total already represents a significant step back for a team that, just a year ago, looked like a division favorite. Even so, Becker noted, “In theory, you can get through a season with a payroll of, say, $30–40 million if you were committed to cheapness, though of course they’re not going to actually go that low.” 

    Minnesota’s only guaranteed contracts are tied to Pablo López ($21.5 million) and Byron Buxton ($15 million). MLB Trade Rumors has also posted the team’s projected arbitration salaries, which are obviously tied to the team’s bottom line. Ryan Jeffers ($6.6 million), Joe Ryan ($5.8 million), Trevor Larnach ($4.7 million), Bailey Ober ($4.6 million), and Royce Lewis ($3 million) are the highest projected arbitration salaries. Out of this group, Larnach is the lone player who is a non-tender candidate

    Non-Tender and Option Decisions
    If Minnesota truly wanted to operate on a bare-bones budget, additional trimming would be possible. The current projection doesn’t include decisions on players like Justin Topa, who could have his option picked up or go through arbitration, but it paints a clear picture of contraction. The Twins need bullpen arms, so it seems likely for Topa to be on the team in some capacity. 

    Becker also mentioned that non-tendering likely candidates like Michael Tonkin, Génesis Cabrera, and Anthony Misiewicz would be part of the equation. Those decisions alone could save an estimated $4.5 million and open spots for younger, league-minimum players. The Twins have shown a willingness in recent years to churn through low-cost relievers, so cutting loose fringe bullpen pieces would fit their recent operational pattern.

    Moving Core Players
    Even with those non-tenders, Becker suggested that Minnesota could push the payroll even lower.

    “They very well could get under $110 million even if Buxton insists on staying, by moving López, Jeffers, and Ryan,” he said. Trading any of those players would dramatically reshape the roster and send a clear message that a reset is underway. López remains under team control for two seasons, and Ryan and Jeffers are both controllable contributors who would bring back strong returns. Those types of moves would prioritize long-term flexibility and prospect depth over immediate competitiveness.

    Reviewing the Deadline Deals
    Becker also pointed out why a total teardown might not make much sense.

    “I’m not sure I expect that much of a blow-up, since they got a lot of MLB-ready guys in the trades (at the deadline),” he wrote. At the 2025 deadline, Minnesota focused on acquiring players who could contribute soon, not just prospects for the distant future. 

    Many of the players the Twins acquired were at Double A or higher, including Hendry Mendez, Mick AbelRyan Gallagher, Sam Armstrong, Taj BradleyJames OutmanKendry Rojas and Alan Roden. That approach signaled the organization’s intent to remain somewhat competitive while managing financial realities. It could allow them to trim payroll while maintaining a respectable big-league roster filled with younger, cost-controlled talent.

    As the winter unfolds, the Twins front office faces a delicate balance between budgetary restraint and fielding a credible team. The direction ownership takes will reveal whether this is a one-year reset, or the start of a longer austerity era in Minnesota baseball.


    What is your estimate for next year’s payroll? Leave a comment and start the discussion. 

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    13 hours ago, thelanges5 said:

    You left out one of the Twins guaranteed contracts. The ghost of Correa is getting $10mil - third highest on the team as of now. 

    Is there anything stopping the team from trying to get out of that debt?

    Maybe if we sent the Astros someone like Lopez we could see that wasted money go away?

    NOT ever what i would wish for, but also something i wouldn't put past the Pohlads from exploring?

    Give them Lopez and in return they'll give us back $10M per year?

     

    5 hours ago, jmlease1 said:

    It's possible for them to drop the payroll all the way down to the $65-70M range, but even for the Cheap Pohlads and their terrible mismanagement of the business aspects of baseball, that seems unlikely.

    If you take their words (leaked and otherwise) at face value, they were claiming a loss of $30M was pending on a payroll of $142M. Again, if you presume they're being honest about wiping out the team's debt with the addition of limited partners, that should take $12M off the books at a minimum (presuming a favorable 3% interest rate on the $400M in debt). If $112M was the break-even point in 2025 and you're taking $12M of costs off the books, you could assume a payroll in the $120-125M range would be supportable without losing money on an annual basis. (let me be clear: under no circumstances to I think anyone should ever believe a professional sports owner when they make claims about their money unless you have the books in front of you and a forensic account by your side...and even then, you should probably get a second opinion)

    Now, I'm quite certain that season ticket and ticket package sales are in the dumpster right now and attendance will be substantially lower than last season's poor showing, but even then it should take additional bungling for the team to lose money on a payroll of $110M. It's certainly possible, of course: they've botched the business of baseball even more than the on-field product over the past 30 years.

    I would guess the floor is somewhere in the $105-110M range, with an upper limit of $125M. But with the Pohlads at the helm, anything is possible. I'd hardly be shocked if they forced a Pablo trade and tried to sell the fanbase that we should be happy they "let" the front office spend back up to $95M. We've come to expect tone-deaf and clueless statements from them for sure.

    This. 

    That 30 million loss (if it's real), is really REALLY bad news for the team.  Like they could go back to 85-90 million a year payrolls.  I am not expecting the team hangs onto Pablo long in the offseason.  They won't dump Buxton (because they can't and he wants to stay in Minnesota), but Pablo I'm sure would gladly be anywhere but here. They will use the excuse to get prospects for him, but the trade will not be that fruitfull. 

    I remember the mid to late 90's very well.  This ownership would go dirt cheap in a heartbeat to pay off debts, its in their DNA.  Like they've got BIG BIGGGGG loses in their commercial investments, most of which was rolled onto the Twin's franchise in that 400 million in debt.  

    20 hours ago, Vanimal46 said:

    Rumor has it they just laid off a bunch of employees on the business side of the organization. If anyone expects payroll to be near $120 million you’re incredibly naive. 

    Yep.  I remember hearing this as well.  They were also shuttering a bunch of the Target Field concessions in certain locations.  From an outsider's position looking in, it looks and feels like a bankruptcy maneuver.

    1 hour ago, laloesch said:

    Yep.  I remember hearing this as well.  They were also shuttering a bunch of the Target Field concessions in certain locations.  From an outsider's position looking in, it looks and feels like a bankruptcy maneuver.

    I attended a game at Dodger Stadium when they were going through that.  You're not wrong about the vibe among the concession stands.  Dunno why they cut corners that way, but apparently they do.

    1 hour ago, laloesch said:

    Yep.  I remember hearing this as well.  They were also shuttering a bunch of the Target Field concessions in certain locations.  From an outsider's position looking in, it looks and feels like a bankruptcy maneuver.

    Deleware North handles concessions. Many of the concession stands are staffed largely by volunteers for some reason.

    I think there is a real possibility that the Pohlads promised the new minority partners  an immediate windfall in 26 and 27 by tanking payroll. The minority owners paid over market price for their shares which tells me there had to be some sort of agreement similar to this. It also lines up as a “baseball rebuild” providing cover 

    If they decide to abandon the rebuild, they will need to spend $200M and/or trade away considerable assets if they want to have a reasonable shot at being a legit playoff team.  Even then, it would be a stretch.  They have no BP, no 1B, well below average SS and 3B, and below average corner OFers, and they need a catcher.

    If they decide to continue the rebuild, payroll will be low by design.  The only signings would likely be 2-3 BP arms because they got nothing.  You don't fill those holes at SS/3B and corner OF with free agents when you have guys ready to fill those spots.  1B, maybe.  BU catcher, probably.

    1 hour ago, Major League Ready said:

    If they decide to abandon the rebuild, they will need to spend $200M and/or trade away considerable assets if they want to have a reasonable shot at being a legit playoff team.  Even then, it would be a stretch.  They have no BP, no 1B, well below average SS and 3B, and below average corner OFers, and they need a catcher.

    If they decide to continue the rebuild, payroll will be low by design.  The only signings would likely be 2-3 BP arms because they got nothing.  You don't fill those holes at SS/3B and corner OF with free agents when you have guys ready to fill those spots.  1B, maybe.  BU catcher, probably.

    I generally agree with this. I'm not sure this is what they will do but I think this is what they should do.

    14 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

    $90-115M for the 26 person roster, with room for a couple of free agent pitchers and perhaps one higher paid bat. 

    I'd guess much closer to 90 million possibly less.  I don't think they are done cutting payroll.  I fully expect Pablo Lopez to be shipped out fairly quickly for prospects.  He's the most valuable chip they have besides Ryan and Buxton who is not going to be traded unless he gets so fed up with how things are going that he waives his no trade clause.    

    1 hour ago, laloesch said:

    I'd guess much closer to 90 million possibly less.  I don't think they are done cutting payroll.  I fully expect Pablo Lopez to be shipped out fairly quickly for prospects.  He's the most valuable chip they have besides Ryan and Buxton who is not going to be traded unless he gets so fed up with how things are going that he waives his no trade clause.    

    Yes. The franchise is in a dark place. Those were just my guesses ($90-115M). I will not be surprised by any number below $90M, even $60M although that seems unlikely. I guess $60-70M might be as likely as $135-145M.

    Pablo Lopez is really good but it is hard to see a team out there giving up what is required to acquire him. I believe he stays. 

    My guess is that Lopez starts the season with the Twins but gets traded at the deadline unless we have a shockingly good 1st half.  That would put us around $92M (see below) to start the year.  This assumes they run with Clemens and/or prospects at 1B.  IDK if they get a free agent or if maybe they give Mendez or Fedko a month in the minors at 1B and then give one of them a go.  Sabato might even get a shot if he starts out the year well.

             
    1 Pablo Lopez 21,750,000   2028
    2 Bailey Ober 5,500,000 Arb-2 2028
    3 Zebby Matthews 780,000    
    4 Taj Bradley 780,000    
    5 SWR 780,000    
             
    Abel / Festa /  Morris / Rojas / Prelipp / Culpepper / Ohl
             
      Relief Pitchers      
    6 Free Agent 7,500,000    
    7 Free Agent  5,000,000    
    8 Free Agent 3,000,000    
    9 Cole Sands 780,000    
    10 Cody Funderburk 780,000    
    11 Cody Laweryson 780,000    
    12 ? 780,000 C-Opt  
    13 ? 780,000    
             
    Morris / Raya /  Duarte /  Culpepper / Klein
             
      Catchers      
    14 Ryan Jeffers 6,500,000 Arb-3 2027
    15 Perades  /  Cardenas 780,000    
             
      Infielders      
    1B Clemens / Sabato / Fedko or Trade 780,000    
    2B Luke Keaschall 780,000    
    3B Royce Lewis 3,000,000 Arb-2 2029
    SS Brooks Lee  >>> Kaelen Culpepper 780,000    
     
      Utility Players      
    20 Kody Clemens  780,000    
    21 Fitzgerald  >>>  Brooks Lee 780,000    
    22 Kyler Fedko 780,000    
    23 Wallner  >>> Gonzalez / Rosario 2,000,000   2030
             
     
             
      Outfielders      
    24 Martin  >>> Jenkins 780,000    
    25 Byron Buxton  CF 15,142,857   2029
    24 Roden  780,000    
     
     
             
      Carlos Correa 10,000,000    
      TOTAL PAYROLL    92,652,857    
    4 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    My guess is that Lopez starts the season with the Twins but gets traded at the deadline unless we have a shockingly good 1st half.  That would put us around $92M (see below) to start the year.  This assumes they run with Clemens and/or prospects at 1B.  IDK if they get a free agent or if maybe they give Mendez or Fedko a month in the minors at 1B and then give one of them a go.  Sabato might even get a shot if he starts out the year well.

             
    1 Pablo Lopez 21,750,000   2028
    2 Bailey Ober 5,500,000 Arb-2 2028
    3 Zebby Matthews 780,000    
    4 Taj Bradley 780,000    
    5 SWR 780,000    
             
    Abel / Festa /  Morris / Rojas / Prelipp / Culpepper / Ohl
             
      Relief Pitchers      
    6 Free Agent 7,500,000    
    7 Free Agent  5,000,000    
    8 Free Agent 3,000,000    
    9 Cole Sands 780,000    
    10 Cody Funderburk 780,000    
    11 Cody Laweryson 780,000    
    12 ? 780,000 C-Opt  
    13 ? 780,000    
             
    Morris / Raya /  Duarte /  Culpepper / Klein
             
      Catchers      
    14 Ryan Jeffers 6,500,000 Arb-3 2027
    15 Perades  /  Cardenas 780,000    
             
      Infielders      
    1B Clemens / Sabato / Fedko or Trade 780,000    
    2B Luke Keaschall 780,000    
    3B Royce Lewis 3,000,000 Arb-2 2029
    SS Brooks Lee  >>> Kaelen Culpepper 780,000    
     
      Utility Players      
    20 Kody Clemens  780,000    
    21 Fitzgerald  >>>  Brooks Lee 780,000    
    22 Kyler Fedko 780,000    
    23 Wallner  >>> Gonzalez / Rosario 2,000,000   2030
             
     
             
      Outfielders      
    24 Martin  >>> Jenkins 780,000    
    25 Byron Buxton  CF 15,142,857   2029
    24 Roden  780,000    
     
     
             
      Carlos Correa 10,000,000    
      TOTAL PAYROLL    92,652,857    

    More than Ryan will come off this list, while others will be added. Either way my guess is $90-115M.

    FWIW, Matt Wallner is still $780,000 for next year I believe. Also, numerous sites state a bonus payment to Carlos Correa of $1.33M to be paid in addition to the $10M salary help for Houston.

    We should have a poll on readers' guesses.

    14 minutes ago, tony&rodney said:

    More than Ryan will come off this list, while others will be added. Either way my guess is $90-115M.

    FWIW, Matt Wallner is still $780,000 for next year I believe. Also, numerous sites state a bonus payment to Carlos Correa of $1.33M to be paid in addition to the $10M salary help for Houston.

    We should have a poll on readers' guesses.

    Who are you thinking.  As you know, Buxton has a no-trade clause.  Jeffers is the only salary of consequence, and I think there is a reasonable chance they keep him around for some continuity with a young pitching staff unless they get a really good return.  

    Major League Ready, if the Twins spend $7.5M for a FA relief pitcher I will buy you a lunch!

    No chance in heck do they do any such thing.

    They also wont spend $5.5M for another relief pitcher, either. 

    Rest of the numbers look ok'ish.  About $85M pending a decision on Pablo.

    27 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    Who are you thinking.  As you know, Buxton has a no-trade clause.  Jeffers is the only salary of consequence, and I think there is a reasonable chance they keep him around for some continuity with a young pitching staff unless they get a really good return.  

    The Twins should not trade just to trade. Their payroll using your list and adding Ryan is below $100M. My idea is that the front office should be looking everywhere and finding matches. So I expect 3-5 trades. Who? No idea, but it could be anyone really except Buxton. There is buzz from New York City for the Twins to give up Ryan for a package of decent players. Decent doesn't cut it for Ryan and the team doesn't need any more mid to back end rotation prospects or utility players. There should be demand from a number of teams. I'm fine with keeping Jeffers, but he is gone after next season so a good return now does make sense. My only wish is for players who are interesting, either established to an extent or top prospects.

    1 hour ago, tony&rodney said:

    The Twins should not trade just to trade. Their payroll using your list and adding Ryan is below $100M. My idea is that the front office should be looking everywhere and finding matches. So I expect 3-5 trades. Who? No idea, but it could be anyone really except Buxton. There is buzz from New York City for the Twins to give up Ryan for a package of decent players. Decent doesn't cut it for Ryan and the team doesn't need any more mid to back end rotation prospects or utility players. There should be demand from a number of teams. I'm fine with keeping Jeffers, but he is gone after next season so a good return now does make sense. My only wish is for players who are interesting, either established to an extent or top prospects.

    I agree on Jeffers and have said previously he could go if the return is a player with a reasonable shot at making an impact.  I just don't see that happening for 1 year of Jeffers.  We shall see.

    Larnach very likely goes.  I didn't mention him because I see the return as inconsequential.  So, I ask my self who could bring a return of consequence.  The only two players are Ryan and Lopez, IMO.  They may make other trades but who else can they trade that would return a player that matters.  Lewis has no value right now.  Why sell at the bottom?  Trading Keaschall makes zero sense, and trading any prospect of consequence makes absolutely no sense unless it was trading from depth like OF prospects for an infield prospect or catcher.  IDK if there will be 2 trades or 6 but I just can't come up with any scenarios beyond Ryan and Lopez that will matter.

    3 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    I agree on Jeffers and have said previously he could go if the return is a player with a reasonable shot at making an impact.  I just don't see that happening for 1 year of Jeffers.  We shall see.

    Larnach very likely goes.  I didn't mention him because I see the return as inconsequential.  So, I ask my self who could bring a return of consequence.  The only two players are Ryan and Lopez, IMO.  They may make other trades but who else can they trade that would return a player that matters.  Lewis has no value right now.  Why sell at the bottom?  Trading Keaschall makes zero sense, and trading any prospect of consequence makes absolutely no sense unless it was trading from depth like OF prospects for an infield prospect or catcher.  IDK if there will be 2 trades or 6 but I just can't come up with any scenarios beyond Ryan and Lopez that will matter.

    Thing is we don't know how another team values Twins. Pittsburgh is even more desperate than MN for bats. Does a Matt Wallner for Jared Jones make sense? Would it if Ka'lai Rosaroi or Kyle DeBarge were added? Arizona needs pitching and is loaded with young infielders but only has one position open (3B). Jordan Lawler has crashed in his first attempts for Arizona. Does a Matthews or Ober for Lawler make sense? I guess it is impossible to know. Many people just state trades are selling low or that another team would be foolish to sell low. I would suggest conversations take place and a few teams take some gambles on low for low trades. It is senseless to always be concerned about letting a guy go and then that player becomes a star. Going along with the same guys is not an option for me. I do understand that it is for many others. In the end I'm just a baseball fan and Twins fan.

    10 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

    Thing is we don't know how another team values Twins. Pittsburgh is even more desperate than MN for bats. Does a Matt Wallner for Jared Jones make sense? Would it if Ka'lai Rosaroi or Kyle DeBarge were added? Arizona needs pitching and is loaded with young infielders but only has one position open (3B). Jordan Lawler has crashed in his first attempts for Arizona. Does a Matthews or Ober for Lawler make sense? I guess it is impossible to know. Many people just state trades are selling low or that another team would be foolish to sell low. I would suggest conversations take place and a few teams take some gambles on low for low trades. It is senseless to always be concerned about letting a guy go and then that player becomes a star. Going along with the same guys is not an option for me. I do understand that it is for many others. In the end I'm just a baseball fan and Twins fan.

    This is creative thinking.  I like it and would encourage this kind of move.  Our difference here is that I see a low for low move as very secondary in importance with a considerably lower chance of impacting the team.  Don't get me wrong.  This sounds like something the Rays would pull off and have it work out.  

    I would rather trade Ober and Wallner for Lawler than trade Matthews.  

    11 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    I would rather trade Ober and Wallner for Lawler than trade Matthews.  

    Me too. At the risk of being obnoxiously repetitive I'll repeat that the status quo isn't good enough. Rolling it back again isn't an option in my mind. I do understand many are in favor of keeping the current roster and believe they will blossom. My inclusion of Matthews was an attempt to view possibilities from an Arizona lens. Naturally, I have zero idea if there are opportunities with Arizona but there must be some possible transactions with some teams.

    These are lower moves. I'm actually interested in signing Josh Naylor, a reserve veteran catcher, and trading Joe Ryan as my major moves. The lesser moves would complement the larger ones.

    1 hour ago, Major League Ready said:

    This is creative thinking.  I like it and would encourage this kind of move.  Our difference here is that I see a low for low move as very secondary in importance with a considerably lower chance of impacting the team.  Don't get me wrong.  This sounds like something the Rays would pull off and have it work out.  

    I would rather trade Ober and Wallner for Lawler than trade Matthews.  

    I think AZ is moving Lawler to CF this coming year, but he was someone I would have targeted before. Now? Unsure? But I'd try him.

    12 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    I think AZ is moving Lawler to CF this coming year, but he was someone I would have targeted before. Now? Unsure? But I'd try him.

    Part of the reason I mention Lawler is because he is a fantastic shortstop but did not feel comfortable at third base. Arizona has All-Stars at 2B and SS, so there is no way he gets an opportunity there. The switch to centerfield runs into challenges too because Arizona has a decent, albeit potentially replaceable,  guy out there. The D-backs need starting pitchers though and thus my thoughts. I want the Twins to take a gamble like this. It may completely fail but the team cannot get any worse.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...