Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Could the Minnesota Twins Embrace a Six-Man Rotation in 2025?


    Cody Christie

    Six-man rotations and extra days of rest are becoming a trend across baseball. Could the Twins embrace this approach because of their starting pitching depth?

    Image courtesy of Left: © Matt Krohn-Imagn Images; Right: © David Banks-Imagn Images;

    Twins Video

    With spring training on the horizon, the Minnesota Twins enter 2025 with intriguing questions surrounding their starting pitching unit. Could they join the growing trend among MLB teams utilizing a six-man rotation? It’s a conversation worth having, especially considering recent changes across the league and the organization’s pitching depth.

    The Six-Man Trend
    In 2025, teams like the Dodgers, Red Sox, and Mets are expected to implement six-man rotations, mainly due to pitchers returning from injuries. The benefits of this approach are becoming increasingly evident. For the first time in MLB history, more starts occurred on exactly five days of rest than four in 2021. This trend has continued, with the gap widening in 2023 and 2024. As of last season, 42% of starts came on five days of rest compared to 32% on four.

    There are multiple theories on why teams are embracing this change. Some suggest that extra rest helps keep pitchers healthier, while others believe it enhances individual performances. A six-man rotation can also lighten the bullpen’s workload or be a way to accommodate a surplus of capable starters. Whatever the reason, teams are increasingly experimenting with more rest between starts.

    The Twins’ Rotation Options
    Minnesota’s projected starting five for 2025 consists of Pablo López, Joe Ryan, Bailey Ober, Simeon Woods Richardson, and Chris Paddack. Each brings unique strengths, but questions remain about their durability. For example, Ober has faced durability concerns earlier in his career, Paddack returned from Tommy John surgery last season, totaling less than 100 innings, and Ryan missed extensive time with a right shoulder strain. Injuries are part of the game, but starters only have so many pitches per season and each additional one thrown adds a little bit to the risk. Spreading out their starts is one strategy to attempt to keep pitchers healthy.

    The Twins also have notable depth at Triple-A, with promising arms like David Festa, Zebby Matthews, and Marco Raya waiting in the wings. This depth makes a six-man rotation a viable consideration, as it would allow Minnesota to ease the workload on their core starters while providing valuable MLB experience for their younger pitchers. This trio of young pitchers reached career highs in innings last season, so they will need to continue to build off those totals in 2025. 

    The Pros and Cons of a Six-Man Rotation
    Research and anecdotal evidence suggest that giving pitchers additional rest can have long-term benefits. Fewer days between starts could reduce injury risk, especially for pitchers like Ryan, who are coming off a season-ending injury. Additionally, Festa and Matthews — and especially someone like Raya — have yet to prove they can handle the rigors of a full MLB season without additional support. A six-man rotation could help these pitchers stay healthy and effective over the grind of 162 games.

    Moreover, extra rest could optimize performance. While not universally proven, some pitchers thrive with an additional day between starts, showing improved velocity and command. These incremental gains could be crucial for a Twins team aiming to reclaim their AL Central crown.

    Of course, a six-man rotation isn’t without drawbacks. It reduces the number of starts for the team’s top pitchers, potentially limiting the impact of Minnesota’s top 3 pitchers: López, Ober, and Ryan. Many projection models view those three pitchers among the AL’s best for next season, and taking innings away from them can result in lost value. Additionally, carrying an extra starter can strain roster construction, forcing tough decisions about bullpen arms or position players.

    The Twins would also need buy-in from their pitchers. Some thrive on routine and may struggle with the adjustment to a different schedule. The pitcher may also need to be sold on why the Twins are moving to this model. For a six-man rotation to work, the team must communicate clearly and manage workloads effectively. 

    A Balanced Approach?
    The Twins could consider a hybrid model rather than committing fully to a six-man rotation. This approach might involve using six starters during stretches with heavy workloads, such as long road trips or weeks without off days while reverting to a traditional five-man rotation during lighter periods. Such flexibility would allow the team to reap the benefits of additional rest without losing too many starts from their top arms.

    As the 2025 season approaches, the Twins’ depth and the evolving landscape of pitcher usage make a six-man rotation an intriguing possibility. While not without challenges, the potential health and performance benefits could outweigh the risks. With pitchers like Festa, Matthews, and Raya ready to contribute, Minnesota has the depth to experiment with this progressive strategy.

    The six-man rotation is no longer a radical idea, as some of baseball’s top organizations are embracing the idea. It’s becoming a viable option for teams seeking a competitive edge. For the Twins, it might just be the key to navigating the marathon of a season while keeping their pitching staff fresh for October.

    Should the Twins switch to a six-man rotation for 2025? Would the hybrid approach work for the team? Leave a comment and start the discussion. 

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    6 hours ago, Cody Christie said:

    The Six-Man Trend
    In 2025, teams like the Dodgers, Red Sox, and Mets are expected to implement six-man rotations, mainly due to pitchers returning from injuries. The benefits of this approach are becoming increasingly evident. For the first time in MLB history, more starts occurred on exactly five days of rest than four in 2021. This trend has continued, with the gap widening in 2023 and 2024. As of last season, 42% of starts came on five days of rest compared to 32% on four.

    It seems like it should be added that the Twins had 42 starts (25.9%) on 4 days rest last year without implementing a 6 man rotation. I also noticed that they did much better on 4 days rest than 5 or 6.

    1 hour ago, Karbo said:

    The only way I could see working well is if you have at least 3 good relievers that can go 2 innings every other day, and may occasionally need them a 2nd consecutive day. I don't see that with the Twins roster.

    The only way to spread the innings among 7 available arms is for someone to do as you say, every now and then.  Rocco tries it now and then, Alcala for a couple innings as an example. 

    7 hours ago, IndianaTwin said:

    A significant factor in the number of starts on five days having increased is the additional off days that were added to the schedule a few years ago. Each off day typically creates five starts that are happening on five days (or sometimes six). When they switched to starting the season on Thursday, they added four off days, which translates to 20 games being started with an extra day.   

    If the Twins were to follow a strict five-pitcher rotation for the entire season, they would have only 60 starts on four days rest, 88 on five days and 4 on six days. Scheduled off days are a bigger factor in the number of extra days than is the idea of "giving someone an extra day" with a six-man rotation or a spot start by someone. 

    That totals 152. There would also be five starts on nine days rest following the All-Star Game and it doesn't count the first five days of the season, though those are often either done on at least five days rest as well or are after a final spring training outing that didn't include a huge number of pitches. .

    For what it's worth, I did the same math with a strict four-pitcher rotation. There would be 79 starts on three days rest, 73 on four days and 5 on five days, along with the four starts that would now be on seven days rest at the All-Star Break and the four starts at the beginning of the year.

     

    I like the idea of a modified six man rotation where starters 5 and 6 piggy back almost all the time. Everyone still gets four days rest on 60 of the starts and five or more days on the other 102. On occasion, you could have 5 and 6 each start a game as in a true six man rotation to give the other starters an extra day or when you need to skip one start for one of your other starters.. This could limit the four days rest starts to under 50.

    I really like it if your 5th and 6th starters are one lefty and one righty (not an option for the Twins currently). I also like it if those two starters typically go fewer innings per start. You can have them go 4-5 innings max or twice through the order max. If the starter gets in trouble, you bring in a reliever to finish the inning and then the 6th starter starts the next inning. You should expect to get 8 innings on average from most of their piggy back starts which helps offset the lost bullpen arm.

    Another consideration here I like if you want a true 5 man rotation is to start the season with the 5th  and 6th piggy backing until one proves themselves the better starter. Then you send the other down to AAA. Many seasons the Twins seem to have a tight race for the 5th starter. In this scenario, you could start the season with an extra reliever for the first four games and bring up the sixth starter for game 5 assuming you have options remaining. If you need to bring up an emergency long reliever due to some back to back short starts you can send down the sixth starter if needed to bring someone else up for a spot start or someone to fortify the bullpen short term.

    3 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

    The idea of using Paddack ahead of Paddack ruins my reading. Good exercise though.

    Doubtful they’d use Paddack ahead of Paddack. Starters rarely pitch two days in a row. 😄

    The question this article asks is if the Twins could use a six-man rotation.  The only possible answer is:  Yes, they could.  All the comments are responding to a question not asked:  Should the Twins use a six-man rotation.

    13 hours ago, ashbury said:

    A good question, and I think it would be very interesting to ask it of someone like Pablo Lopez, someone I believe to be as much a student of the game as a prime athlete and skilled pitcher.  I am guessing that the answer we might get is that, even if he doesn't like to admit it, he appreciates the occasional extra day between starts because it's a strain to pitch every 5 days without a break, and his performance will be better.  But I'm not the athlete, just the asker, and it's only a guess on my part.

    If the # 1 doesn't fight for the ball every 5 days is he REALLY a # 1.

    Let's wait to see if we even have 5 healthy and effective starters, let alone 6, that deserve a full-time rotation spot. I'd go with the hybrid method if anything. Our bullpen usually throws a lot of innings. To keep our relievers healthy and from being over worked, I don't think we can spare the roster spot on a SP number 6 for long periods of time.

    9 hours ago, terrydactyls said:

    The question this article asks is if the Twins could use a six-man rotation.  The only possible answer is:  Yes, they could.  All the comments are responding to a question not asked:  Should the Twins use a six-man rotation.

    The headline asked that question.  The article itself examined both sides of the question, and came down with a conclusion that was a measured "yes".  The comments have been thoughtful.

    Did you read more than the headline?  What's your position on the topic?  Could you answer it?  Should you?  😀

    1 hour ago, ashbury said:

    The headline asked that question.  The article itself examined both sides of the question, and came down with a conclusion that was a measured "yes".  The comments have been thoughtful.

    Did you read more than the headline?  What's your position on the topic?  Could you answer it?  Should you?  😀

    I started to read it but quit when I noticed it was different than the topic.  Do I have an opinion?  Nope.  Should I?  Why.  It ain't up to me so why waste time worrying.

    The Twins don't have the pitching depth to even worry about this. One of the top three is coming off a serious shoulder injury and likely has an innings limit. #4 hasn't approached anything like a healthy season since 2019. SWR had a solid rookie year, but showed signs of wearing down at the end. The only pitcher you list in AAA that looks MLB ready is Festa, and even if he starts there (as Ober did two years ago), I have no doubt he'll be in the MLB rotation quickly due to injury (Ryan/Paddack?) or regression (SWR?) as Ober was two years ago. Zebby clearly needs more work in the minors, and Raya has rarely pitched more than 5 innings as a pro. Plus, there is also evidence (there was a recent Athletic article about the Dodgers' potential six-man) that lots of pitchers pitch worse on an extra day's rest. So, yeah it is possible, but this team needs to pray for general health, and use its minor league "depth" to spot spell IP limited starters, (And hope some of the other AAA assets like Adams and Morris step up. If they don't, and/or something happens to Lopez or Ober, we might be blackly laughing at SP depth articles by mid-May.

    If you have a horse or 3 that work on 4 days rest better than the others, leave the nags in the stable and ride your show ponys.  More of a ranch than a farm saying.  
    Is it just the velocity and spin rates that are blowing up elbows and shoulders or is a lack of offseason rest?  Kids these days can’t seem to carry a full bucket of water without tripping….. ok that’s probably not fair 🤷🏼‍♂️

    18 hours ago, Fatbat said:

    If you have a horse or 3 that work on 4 days rest better than the others, leave the nags in the stable and ride your show ponys.  More of a ranch than a farm saying.  
    Is it just the velocity and spin rates that are blowing up elbows and shoulders or is a lack of offseason rest?  Kids these days can’t seem to carry a full bucket of water without tripping….. ok that’s probably not fair 🤷🏼‍♂️

    Not sure what this quote means, but case studies I've browsed show no injury prevention benefit from pitching on more than 5 days of rest. Proponents of the concept remain steadfast supporters of a hypothetical advantage that hasn't shown up in medical case studies. Like tapping the lid of the soft drink can before opening it will prevent the drink from overflowing.

    The 6 man rotation proponents have practically reached cult-like status at this point. For years they've talked about teams who are expected to implement 6 man rotations, bolstering their cause with phrases like "the six man trend," though there hasn't been a trend because no teams have actually used it apart from the Angels. The "six man rotation" is almost always related to major injuries and spot starts, and there's always a starter which miraculously has 30 starts on the team. 27 starts would be the theoretical maximum for a planned and scheduled 6 man rotation.

    The Dodgers are this year's definitely doing a 6 man rotation! Except I'd be willing to bet money they won't. The Dodgers are not going to trade Shohei Ohtani starts for Tony Gonsolin starts, especially when Gonsolin has an option, and has declined recently.

    The drop off from a #1 starter to a #6 or AAA replacement starter is enormous. That's why the 6 man rotations doesn't actually exist. Teams are trying to win games, not lose them.

     

    I like how Indiana Twin has laid out his "starts" over the course of a season.  It gives us a logical look how a 6-man rotation could play out.  Each team in MLB would have different reasons for a 6-man rotation. 

    Take the Dodgers:  With the addition of Sasaki and with Yamamoto in the rotation along with Ohtani you have 50% of a 6-man staff accustomed to working in a 6-man staff.  Ohtani is coming off Tommy John surgery.  Yamamoto had injury issues last year.  In addition, with the other three, Snell, Glasgow and potentially Kershaw, each of those guys with their injury issues benefits from an extra day of rest.

    The challenge for the Dodgers is how deep do each of their pitchers go in games, especially Snell and Kershaw, their 2 lefty's who recently have been 5 inning pitchers.  Dave Roberts biggest challenge will be managing a BP that, while his rotation will probably give him at least 5 good innings each outing,  will have a LOT of innings the BP will have to cover.

    The Twins #4, #5 & #6 SP's are not of the caliber the Dodgers have.  I will also echo the idea that Paddack will not be on the Twins in 2025, so you're looking at SWR, Festa and Matthews as #4, #5 & #6.  With that, even though I think 2025 will see Festa and Matthews emerge, I'd stick with a 5-man staff and maximize my starts for Pablo, Ryan and Ober while having Varland and maybe one other pitcher that I could use for 2-inning stints 2 to 3 times per week.  Maybe that's how Raya breaks in to the big leagues.

    A 6-man rotation makes perfect sense for the Dodgers.  It is an interesting consideration for the Twins, but the way our rotation will look after a Paddack trade, I don't see it working in 2025.  

    4 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    Not sure what this quote means, but case studies I've browsed show no injury prevention benefit from pitching on more than 5 days of rest. Proponents of the concept remain steadfast supporters of a hypothetical advantage that hasn't shown up in medical case studies. Like tapping the lid of the soft drink can before opening it will prevent the drink from overflowing.

    People need to get over the idea that starting pitchers are "resting" between starts like they're taking a 4 day nap. If they weren't working out on off days their muscles would atrophy and you would see performance slip as the season goes on. Ask a person training for a marathon if their training plan is to run once every 5 days and sit on the couch the other 4 days.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...