Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Article: Minnesota Twins Roster Projection 3.0


Recommended Posts

Posted
It may be painfull, but this is a sort out year. Find out which of the Twins young players that are ready have a future here. That is why I am hoping there is no room for either Kubel or Bartlett. Parmelee, Florimon, Escobar, Plouffe, Hicks and Arcia all need to play and see which ones can grow and which ones will need to be pushed or replaced next year.

 

100% this.

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Kendry Morales would plug in nicely into the DH spot right now. Two years $24 million could probably do it. Keep Cola as right handed bat off the bench. Try to get Parmelee through waivers and send Kubel to AAA as insurance for injuries. Won't happen, probably, but it would give us a consistent RBI guy behind Mauer and Hammer.

Posted

Why sign Morales? They have no 3B, SS, CF, C....they might not have a LF (if you count defense). They might or might not have a 2B. What good does a 2 year deal do this team, at this point, with this roster? This year has to be about the future, imo.

Posted

I just don't know if I could handle another 95 plus loss season with guys like Parmalee and Escobar getting a ton of at bats. Need to start to winning a few more games to change the losing ways around.

Posted

ppearson50, that is fair.

 

I'd rather see a young lineup with hope, but it looks like neither of us is getting our wish. We are getting old and medium aged guys, with little hope, and little current ability either (on offense....the pitching MIGHT be different).

Posted

This suggests that Pinto might well make the roster:

http://www.1500espn.com/sportswire/Mackey_Why_the_Twins_are_probably_going_to_start_Suzuki_over_Pinto031714

 

I'm fine with Suzuki being named the starter right now, I just don't want him getting 80-90% of the starts if Pinto is on the roster. I liked the Suzuki signing as a guy who could help the pitching staff and mentor Pinto, but if Pinto is on the roster he needs to PLAY. If he's not getting 30-40% of the starts by mid-summer and at least 50% by fall I suspect they'll have done it wrong for Pinto's development...

Posted

 

 

Thanks for pointing out this column. Really fascinating on the leadership and worth ethic angle. If Suzuki is willing to mentor Pinto, this could be a really good combination that could see playing time adjusted over the course of the season.

 

(And how could I not like him when he's compared to Mike Redmond?)

Posted
Having any combination of Kubel, Parmelee and Colabello on the final opening day roster is a sure recipe for another 90+ loss season. NONE of the likes of them belong any place close to a MLB roster. Name me one more MLB team that would even be considering such ludicrous roster moves, ONE!

 

There aren't any sure recipes for anything in baseball, particularly where it comes to the 24th or 25th man on the roster.

Posted

I am sure this has been posted elsewhere, but with Gardy perhaps liking Meyer out of the bullpen initially, this really has to push the aging guys like Guerrier out of the picture, right? I imagine at some point, they would send Meyer down to AAA to stretch out and come back starting in July or some such thing, but that would seem to mean a younger guy like Tonkin or Guerra would come up.

 

I would add Guerrier to the list with Kubel as competition fodder. And it may have helped some guys.

Posted
I am sure this has been posted elsewhere, but with Gardy perhaps liking Meyer out of the bullpen initially, this really has to push the aging guys like Guerrier out of the picture, right? I imagine at some point, they would send Meyer down to AAA to stretch out and come back starting in July or some such thing, but that would seem to mean a younger guy like Tonkin or Guerra would come up.

 

Source? I don't think Seth mentions Meyer. I'm all in favor of Meyer starting in AA. With even a quick stop in AAA before MLB. I do think Tonkin's and Deolis's stock is rising.

Posted

"If the Twins could deal maybe Burton and/or Duensing, Tonkin and Hoffman would get a shot."

I seem to remember the two of them being on the trading block last July and getting little to no interest. Now that teams are getting closer to opening day rosters, is there reason to think that the interest in either reliever has or will increase?

Posted
I wouldn't be so quick to cut Kubel. He has at least as much upside as Colabello or Parmelee IMO. Same for Bartlett. More upside there than Escobar or Florimon.

 

In just what alternate universe do Kubel and Bartlett have more upside than Colabello/Parmelee and Escorbar/Florimon? Perhaps if it was for spots on the Rochester roster, certainly does not shake out in Target Field now, does it?

Posted
What scenario, besides Plouffe getting injured, do you envision in which Romero gets called up?

 

I could see Romero, if he continues on his currently trajectory, being a call up under a couple scenarios:

 

1) A Plouffe injury

2) A possible move of Plouffe to the OF (LF) due to Willingham trade or injury. Adding an additional RH bat and looking to the future more.

3) An injury to Colabello or just a harsh crash return to earth, showing that his adjustments and improvement this year just aren't real.

 

Perhaps I am mistaken, but I have read that Romero has at leat a little experience at 1B. He could provide a RH bat off the bench under some mentioned possibilities. After his virtual disappearance as a prospect in 2009, he has been slowly rebounding to a quality year last season after his late arrival due to visa problems, building on a strong 2012. I am willing to bet the anti-Plouffe fans might be clamoring a bit more for his receiving an opportunity had he been n ST last year and gotten a full season.

 

For the record, I am NOT anti-Plouffe, nor do I speculate a long and highly successful year for D Romero. However, I think he has the potential to be a helpful RH bat and role player.

Posted

I repeat that to this point, without showing a sudden upturn, I'd cut Kubel, go younger with Parmelee and Colabello, and see if I could convince Kubes to spend some time at Rochester to see if he can find himself.

 

I also think at this time it's almost a forgone conclusion that Hicks opens in CF, and I'm all in on that. But I also have Presley penciled in as the 4th OF. I am beginning to rethink that due to his poor ST thus far. Is Ramirez a real and viable option for that spot?

Posted
Source? I don't think Seth mentions Meyer. I'm all in favor of Meyer starting in AA. With even a quick stop in AAA before MLB. I do think Tonkin's and Deolis's stock is rising.

 

It was on mlbtraderumors hours before I posted. I am surprised that no one here paid attention to/saw that from Gardy. Weird.

Posted

Again . . . another year . . . and a lot of attention given to spring training stats. It's a short sample and it is worse than any same short sample from actual true MLB time in the actual season. Good lord.

Posted

My question about this article is who are you going to put as the back up catcher of Chris Herman gets cut? Your first two roster projects both had Eric Fryer, which everyone know is crazy. He couldn't hit well at triple A, and he didn't hit well in the majors. Chris Hermann actually had some success at the major league level, so if anything he should have been the back up on your first two projections. The reason i ask my opening question is because Pinto should have been your first guess for back up catcher. First, he was exciting to watch last September at the major league level. Second, the twins have said a number of times that they wouldn't have a problem playing him 3-4 days a week on the major league squad, they don't feel its that important to keep him in the line up every day. Lastly, i mean Eric fryer? Where did that even come from? Thats about as random as picking James Beresford as your utility infielder. Both him and fryer were up in September, neither hit well, and there are better people than both of them.

Posted

Rameriz could make the club, that would mean the Collabello would not, or they would send Presley down. That would be an issue with a fourth outfielder. Twins could trade some of their bullpen for a 4th outfielder, would depend on who, or trade Herrmann or Fryer with another player(Parmelee) to the Pirates for Tabata(Pirates also have excess relief pitching). Might take a bit more than that to get it done, but worth a try.

Posted
Rameriz could make the club, that would mean the Collabello would not, or they would send Presley down. That would be an issue with a fourth outfielder. Twins could trade some of their bullpen for a 4th outfielder, would depend on who, or trade Herrmann or Fryer with another player(Parmelee) to the Pirates for Tabata(Pirates also have excess relief pitching). Might take a bit more than that to get it done, but worth a try.

 

I would not trade a bullpen arm for a 4th OF. Mastro or Pressly are fine if they are your 4th OF and play once a week. Come July, teams may actually give something up for a reliever, but they won't give up squat for a 4th OF.

Posted
I would not trade a bullpen arm for a 4th OF. Mastro or Pressly are fine if they are your 4th OF and play once a week. Come July, teams may actually give something up for a reliever, but they won't give up squat for a 4th OF.

Quote was misread, Tabata was a starting Pirate outfielder for the last 2-3 years, had a down year last year and is being cleared for the Pirates #1 prospect Gregory Polanco at this time. Pirates need backup catching and a left handed hitting first baseman. All I was suggesting was sending some of our excess for some of their excess. Do not know if the trade would work, but the parameters seem about right.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...