Willihammer Provisional Member Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 According to MLBTR the Padres want to move Derek Norris.http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2016/07/derek-norris-trade-rumor-brewers-padres.html 27 years old, entering his 2nd year arbitration after a down 2016 (first half at least). He rates as exactly league average at CS% and is above average at catcher framing. The Twins should make an offer IMO. He and Centeno would make a good pair in 2017. JRM is a bust.
Rosterman Verified Member Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 He will probably be grabbed before Suzuki. So I doubt the Twins would be in contention. Best bet would be to overpay in the offseason for Ramos. But overpaying for a catcher is not something you really want to do.
nicksaviking Community Moderator Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 Depends how low. I'd take a chance on him but with two years of disappointing production I'm not sure I'd want to give up anything too regretful. I was wondering if they could work a three team deal where the contending team gets Suzuki as his current play is probably more attractive for the remainder of 2016. Then the Twins would likely have to give up lesser auxillery pieces.
Willihammer Provisional Member Posted July 31, 2016 Author Posted July 31, 2016 I admit I haven't followed the Padres that closely (who does). Maybe there's something up with Norris I'm not considering. But statistically speaking he and Ramos are at opposite ends of the regression spectrum: Ramos is having a 140 OPS+ season against a career avg 100+. His BABIP is .055 points above his career avg.Norris is having a 66 OPS+ season against a career avg 96. His BABIP is .057 pts below his career avg. Also noticed Norris is listed at 230 pounds on BB-ref. If you think that sounds high for a catcher, Ramos is listed at 255! Those figures really are worthless.
mudcat14 Verified Member Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 Since Lucroy rebuffed the Indians, I'd offer the Tribe Suzuki & Palka for hot prospect, Francisco Mejia. Go with Centeno, Murphy & whatever cast-offs they can for a year or two until he's ready.
Kwak Verified Member Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 Since Lucroy rebuffed the Indians, I'd offer the Tribe Suzuki & Palka for hot prospect, Francisco Mejia. Go with Centeno, Murphy & whatever cast-offs they can for a year or two until he's ready.I expect the Indians are "on the horn" to the Braves (there's a mouthful) about acquiring AJ to end the season.
ScrapTheNickname Provisional Member Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 Murphy is only 25 years and 2 months old ... who is to say that he isn't having a down year and will bounce back? Too early, in my opinion, to give up on him. That said, we can't rely on him, given what he's shown with the Twins and at AAA.
Willihammer Provisional Member Posted July 31, 2016 Author Posted July 31, 2016 Probably too early to give up on Murphy but I hope he isn't plan A or B next year.
darin617 Verified Member Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 He will probably be grabbed before Suzuki. So I doubt the Twins would be in contention. Best bet would be to overpay in the offseason for Ramos. But overpaying for a catcher is not something you really want to do.Why would you say that? It worked out so well when the Twins invested $23M/yr in a catcher a few years back, the name escapes me at the moment...
howeda7 Verified Member Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 I wanted them to trade Plouffe for Norris last offseason. If they both clear waivers, that's a trade I'd still make.
jorgenswest Verified Member Posted July 31, 2016 Posted July 31, 2016 I wanted them to trade Plouffe for Norris last offseason. If they both clear waivers, that's a trade I'd still make. Anyone would make this trade from the Twins perspective.
Marek Houston Wichita Wind Surge - AA SS Houston went 3-for-4. He's hitting .333/.415/.505 (.920) since joining the Kernels. He added his fifth and sixth doubles. Explore Marek Houston News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.