Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Attention Mauer Haters - Part 2


Recommended Posts

Posted

Per a Twitter post from Aaron Gleeman, Fan Graphs has Joe Mauer on pace to be worth $24 million this year. A reminder to everybody that he is making $23 million this year.

 

Where are all of "Mauer is overpaid" comments now?

 

(That sound you hear is the crickets chirping in the background.)

Provisional Member
Posted

I love FG, but the money value chart is one of the stupidest things on that site.

Posted

Mauer is overpaid given what they are willing to spend on the whole team. Happy now? Are we really going to do this every week? And how does this opinion make anyone a hater?

Posted

I also think Mauer is overpaid - and that doesn't make me a "Mauer-hater." I actually think he's done well for the team this year, but it was still a fool's contract, as much as for the length as for the amount. The think the Twins knew it, too, but they were boxed in by circumstances outside their control - just like Drew Brees and New Orleans this year.

Posted

He signed the contract, everyone needs to just get over it. What if this, what if that, it really doesn't matter, he is on our team and is playing well. Let's all just be happy he plays for us and not the Yankees. I don't think anyone can make the arguement that he is worth a quarter of the teams total payroll, but how do we make this a winning organization with his contract, because frankly it isn't going any where.

Posted

I'm not convinced that Mauer isn't overpaid.

 

Also... if you're tired of hearing people complain about Mauer's salary, starting threads like this isn't going to stop that. It's just going to start the argument up all over again.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Do we really need to be having this discussion for the 5th time this month?

Posted

The FG dollar values give credit for position scarcity. Mauer is not a full time Catcher anymore so the dollar figure is heavily inflated. I dont fully understand the calculation but I would guess if he was compared to other 1B/DH types he would be at a 10 mil pace.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

The FG dollar values give credit for position scarcity. Mauer is not a full time Catcher anymore so the dollar figure is heavily inflated. I dont fully understand the calculation but I would guess if he was compared to other 1B/DH types he would be at a 10 mil pace.

Much like WAR it's not currently giving him "full credit" as a full time catcher, its give him half credit at C and half at 1st base, so basically its a wash.

Posted

Much like WAR it's not currently giving him "full credit" as a full time catcher, its give him half credit at C and half at 1st base, so basically its a wash.

What about all the DH starts?

Old-Timey Member
Posted

What about all the DH starts?

Takes those into account as well.

Provisional Member
Posted

It's a pointless number that Dave Cameron and his merry band of jackasses assign to a win. When I first started ready FG I used it all the time, but as I looked more into it, it's just worthless to even use it in any type of debate.

Guest USAFChief
Guests
Posted

It's a pointless number that Dave Cameron and his merry band of jackasses assign to a win. When I first started ready FG I used it all the time, but as I looked more into it, it's just worthless to even use it in any type of debate.

So it's every bit as useful as WAR. Good to know.
Posted

So it's every bit as useful as WAR. Good to know.

Less useful, evidently. If you're not a fan of WAR, then you're probably less of a fan of statistics that rely on the accuracy of WAR, like Player Value.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

It's a pointless number that Dave Cameron and his merry band of jackasses assign to a win. When I first started ready FG I used it all the time, but as I looked more into it, it's just worthless to even use it in any type of debate.

It's not worthless, its just not strong enough to be used as a stand alone in an argument, it will show you some relative value of players. For instance Delmon was in negative numbers for a bit, which I think is entirely accurate.

Provisional Member
Posted

It's not worthless, its just not strong enough to be used as a stand alone in an argument, it will show you some relative value of players. For instance Delmon was in negative numbers for a bit, which I think is entirely accurate.

WOW...that's such a great analogy Dave, you totally changed my view by using Delmon ****ing Young to show how a worthless player is worth negative value.

Provisional Member
Posted

Agreed. It's basically useless.

to be fair a lot of teams use the "~4.5 million per win" formula in evaluating contracts

Guest USAFChief
Guests
Posted

to be fair a lot of teams use the "~4.5 million per win" formula in evaluating contracts

Might it be more accurate to say "a lot of writers and posters at Fangraphs use the ~4.5 million per win" formula in evaluating contracts?

 

Or is there actual evidence "a lot of teams" are using that?

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Yadier Molina must be worth 35 million then according to Fangraphs.

 

What was Mauer worth during his 09 season? 50 million?

Mauer had a $35.7 mil worth in 09

Molina has a 17.1 Mil worth vs Mauers 13.3 Mil worth this year.

Molina only has an OPS 20 pts higher then Mauer which suggests that since he is a full time catcher its effecting his worth quite a bit.

Provisional Member
Posted

Might it be more accurate to say "a lot of writers and posters at Fangraphs use the ~4.5 million per win" formula in evaluating contracts?

 

Or is there actual evidence "a lot of teams" are using that?

there was a post about how CC Sabathia's contract extension broke down almost exactly like that (with projected regression and all that good stuff) . I don't suppose you could get a major league GM to admit how he values contracts though, no.

Posted

God. This thread makes me sick. Fangraphs is not the end-all, but people are just absolutely stupid about statistics and damn mathematics sometimes around here.

Guest USAFChief
Guests
Posted

God. This thread makes me sick. Fangraphs is not the end-all, but people are just absolutely stupid about statistics and damn mathematics sometimes around here.

Please educate us.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...