At the beginning of the year, this team shouldn't have approached the futility we are seeing, but lets look at this: Position players in total are outperforming hopes and expectations: healthy Mauer, healthy Morneau, healthy Span (concussion wise), Willingham, Doumit, Plouffe, even Butera. Hard to argue against these decisions. Bullpen is, at the worst, doing what was expected. Not the league worst, fairly effective, even very good at times. Starting staff decimated by injuries and playing below expectations. Look at the opening day starting five: Pavano - if he only pitched at the same level he pitched last year, missed a lot of time due to injury (how long did he pitch hurt?). Baker - Out for season, injury. Liriano - 1st half was disaster, pitched better over last 8 starts with the team (couldn't even match last year's terrible numbers) Blackburn - Unmitigated disaster, should have been more effective (again, couldn't match last year's numbers) Marquis - Unmitigated disaster, should have been more effective (how much did missing Spring Training mess with him? Look at him now) If these five had pitched to the levels they were supposed to how many more wins would the Twins have? Ten is probably a conservative number. Add ten wins and subtract ten losses, what do you have? A .500 team. I guarantee you nobody around here would be complaining about .500 after last year. The Twins banked on these guys maintaining and being healthy. Virtually everything that could go wrong, did go wrong. Why is everybody ignoring the fact that this team has been about .500 since May? The sample size is large enough that you don't write it off. This is currently an average team that needs to improve it's starting pitching. But yet you say fire everybody and start over... How many IFS does it take to get to .500? I don't know how you can spin something positive out of the worst record in the AL, and the 2nd highest ERA in the Majors.