Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Let’s Re-Do the Twins’ Offseason


Twins Video

A lot has been said about the Twins’ offseason, especially regarding comments made by members of ownership and those in baseball operations about the payroll decreasing.

 Some frustration, on one hand, is warranted considering the optics that inevitably surround explicitly telling fans that payroll will decrease immediately after the most successful season in the past 20 years. However, with how the roster is constructed, spending a lot of money in free agency never seemed likely. The Twins have a lot of young talent under team control for a significant amount of time, including the likes of Royce Lewis, Edouard Julien, Joe Ryan, Bailey Ober, and Jhoan Duran just to name a few. Having that level of talent making pre-arbitration or arbitration one numbers is just naturally conducive to having a lower payroll, and it never made sense to spend for players to play positions that are already filled with those young talents. That being said, there is some room for spending during the 2024 offseason. So, let’s go back in time to November 2nd, 2023, and re-do the Twins’ Offseason.

I am going to constrain myself to some rules for this thought exercise. The first rule is that I am going to be as realistic as possible so unfortunately, Shohei Ohtani: you are not a Twin. My second rule is that for any players that have already been signed, I will be using their real-world contracts here. For example, the San Francisco Giants signed outfielder Jorge Soler to a 3-year, $42 million contract. Therefore, if I were to sign him to the Twins, it would have to be for 3 years and $42 million. This, again, is to ensure as much realism as possible for my exercise. With that out of the way, let’s get started.

1.   LHP Shōta Imanaga (4-Years, $53 Million)

     With Sonny Gray and Kenta Maeda both being free agents, the Twins have a need to fill in the rotation. In 2023, Sonny and Kenta contributed 6.8 fWAR to the team. Maeda’s 1.5 fWAR contribution can be replaced in-house by Chris Paddack’s full return to the rotation. FanGraphs’ projections system projects the 50th percentile outcome for Paddack’s 2024 to be worth about 2.1 fWAR. That still leaves 4.7 fWAR to be replaced. Another portion of that will be filled by the progression in the young careers of Joe Ryan and Bailey Ober as they (hopefully) have healthier and better seasons when they enter their 3rd full year of service time. That still leaves room to fill with an outside addition, because resigning Sonny Gray never made sense as Sonny Gray himself is unlikely to replicate his 2023 season and giving 2024 Sonny Gray 3 years and $75 million never made sense due to the very likely regression of the aging pitcher. This was made more apparent by the disparity between his expected 2023 ERA, which was calculated by Statcast using his batted ball data, falling at 3.66, and his actual 2.79 ERA. While trading for a starting pitcher with control makes the most sense, teams with starters to move like Milwaukee and Miami seem unlikely to move anyone.

     This brings us to Shōta Imanaga, the 30-year-old left-hander out of NPB’s Yokohama Baystars. The 5 '10 pitcher pitched to a 2.80 ERA in 148 IP while pitching to a 10.9 K/9 and 1.5 BB/9 in NPB action. He led World Baseball Classic pitchers in Stuff+, a measurement of the movement and velocity of pitchers. This was off the back of his 4-Seam Fastball that, while it sits in the low 90s, has nearly 20 inches of induced vertical break, meaning most batters swing under the pitch expecting it to drop more than it does. To compare, Joe Ryan’s fastball averages 17 inches of induced vertical break, helping him strike out an absurd 29.3% of his batters faced. Imanaga profiles to have a fastball with a very similar effect, while also having better control than Ryan does with his fastball. Imanaga backs up his fastball with a very versatile arsenal, common for Japanese pitchers. He also throws a sweeper, a traditional slider, a splitter, and throws in a curveball, cutter, and changeup for fun. The Japanese pitcher’s fastball-slider combo is something that the Twins have valued in their pitchers and would allow him to fit right into the Twins’ rotation. In real life, Imanaga signed with the Chicago Cubs for 4-years and $53 million with player options in 2026 and 2027 and a club option in 2028, bringing the total potential value of the deal to $80 million, something the Twins could afford, especially with the year-to-year flexibility this contract gives the player and team.

     Some would point to the Twins’ failure in previous NPB dealings such as Tsuyoshi Nishioka as a reason the Twins should be hesitant to sign NPB talent. However, pitchers transitioning from NPB to MLB have a much better track record than hitters such as Nishioka. The current Falvey-led front office is also radically different from the Terry Ryan-led regime that last gave contracts to NPB talent. Shōta Imanaga looks to be a very good starting pitcher in MLB and one that could absolutely contribute to the Minnesota Twins’ rotation.

2.   1B Rhys Hoskins (2- Years, $34 million)

     Perhaps the Twins’ biggest holes throughout the 2023 season was their weaknesses against left-handed pitching and an inability to get consistent value out of their first basemen. The Twins hit a league average 100 WRC+ against LHP compared to a 111 WRC+ against RHP, ranked 5th in MLB. While Alex Kirilloff had a good 2023, he also showcased an inability to hit left-handed pitching, and his health remains a question. After missing most of 2023, Jose Miranda also needs to reestablish himself as a viable option for the Twins. A great way to kill both of those birds would be to sign the former Phillies’ first baseman: Rhys Hoskins. Though Hoskins missed all of the 2023 season after tearing his ACL in Spring Training, he had a potent 2022 where he hit a .794 OPS (123 OPS+) with 30 home runs. Importantly, he had a .945 OPS (163 OPS+) in 174 PAs against left-handed hitting. While Hoskins’ defense is not very good, posting -6 Outs Above Average in 2022, however, 1B is the least significant defensive position. As long as whoever plays there can catch a seed from Carlos Correa, it’ll do.

     In real life, the slugger signed with the Milwaukee Brewers for two years and $34 million. The deal includes an opt-out after the first year, as well as a mutual option for a third year that would raise the total value to $48 million. A right-handed hitter was the Twins’ biggest need going into this offseason, and with that price and fit, Rhys Hoskins is likely the best option the Twins could have had.

     This is the one that gets to me personally; if Rhys had any interest in playing for the Twins with the same price and contract structure, that is a deal that the front office should absolutely have pounced on and one that the Twins could end up regretting.

3.   What I’d Keep

     The Twins did work to improve the roster in real life, and there is plenty that I would replicate in this scenario. The Twins project to have one of the strongest bullpens in all of baseball for 2024, much of which is thanks to moves made this offseason.

     In this universe, I would replicate the Jorge Polanco and Nick Gordon trades, Although these two were fan favorites, they unfortunately did not have guaranteed roles on the 2024 roster with the emergence of Edouard Julien and Willi Castro. The combined return of Justin Topa, Anthony DeSclafani, Steven Okert as well as borderline top-100 prospect Gabriel Gonzalez do enough to improve the bullpen, depth, and farm system to justify moving Polanco and Gordon to Seattle and Miami respectively.

     The other move I would replicate is the Jay Jackson signing. Jay Jackson is an intriguing arm with a plus slider and fastball. He was signed for 1 year and $1.3 million with a club option that can raise the total value to 2 years and $5.45 million. For that low of a price, there is very little that can happen that can cause the Twins to regret this move.

     As Rhys Hoskins is a Twin in this alternate universe, there is no role for Carlos Santana to be on the roster, so that deal won’t be replicated.

 

For the first year in what feels like forever, the Twins came into the off-season looking very competitive and only requiring tweaks to the roster to be able to continue to compete. With the additions of Shōta Imanaga and Rhys Hoskins, the Twins could solidify themselves as powerhouses in the AL.

That being said, the Twins real-life roster looks to be very good on the backs of Pablo Lopez, Carlos Correa, Royce Lewis, and Byron Buxton. So, even if this offseason was a frustrating one, enjoy this upcoming summer, as it looks to be one of the most fun ones in recent memory.

 

13 Comments


Recommended Comments

GKuehl

Posted

How is this realistic considering it would add approximately $30 million to our existing payroll? I'm sure the Front Office would have loved to have another $30 million to play with, but I don't see how picking 2 deals you think the Twins should have matched but couldn't because of ownership's self-imposed payroll presents a realistic alternative to the status quo. 

nick_hansen

Posted

34 minutes ago, GKuehl said:

How is this realistic considering it would add approximately $30 million to our existing payroll? I'm sure the Front Office would have loved to have another $30 million to play with, but I don't see how picking 2 deals you think the Twins should have matched but couldn't because of ownership's self-imposed payroll presents a realistic alternative to the status quo. 

I could be wrong, but that would take us to a little under what the opening day payroll was last year so that at least seems realistic if we were not facing the uncertainty with the TV deal.

GKuehl

Posted

29 minutes ago, nick_hansen said:

I could be wrong, but that would take us to a little under what the opening day payroll was last year so that at least seems realistic if we were not facing the uncertainty with the TV deal.

I agree with you in principle -- but if Falvey could spend another $30 million, he would. 

nick_hansen

Posted

24 minutes ago, GKuehl said:

I agree with you in principle -- but if Falvey could spend another $30 million, he would. 

That is 100% my belief as well. It is totally an ownership decision and this FO will spend every dollar they have available.

AidanAver

Posted

1 hour ago, nick_hansen said:

That is 100% my belief as well. It is totally an ownership decision and this FO will spend every dollar they have available.

This is kind of the point that I am trying to make here, in a world where the Pohlads allowed further spending, that this is what they would/should do. If they opened the wallet as much as last off-season, these are the guys they would've targeted in my opinion. 

jorgenswest

Posted

I would have taken the Farmer and Santana and DeSclafani dollars and spent them on one player. It would be close to the Corbin Burnes salary.

  • Deal Polanco to Seattle but let them keep DeSclafani. I wonder if Seattle does the deal without DeSclafani.
  • Nontender Farmer
  • Win the Corbin Burnes trade. They can better DJ Hall with Varland and then add two other prospects like Gonzalez and Miller or Salas.
  • If dollars remain as add that bat against left handed pitching.
  • The fight for Farmer’s utility spot is between Martin, Helman and Prato.
  • The fight for Santana’s more regular role is between Miranda, Severino and Lee (Julien would get more time at 1B/DH).

Burnes plus the two that emerge during the season of the 6 listed gives them a better shot in the playoffs than DeSclafani, Santana and Farmer. The 2025 team suffers with the loss of Varland but they will have a comp pick to develop in the longer term.

Fatbat

Posted

10 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

If you are going back to November, skip the Twins and buy one million shares of Nvidia (NVDA). It will bring you more satisfaction and is just as realistic.

The Pohlads spent all their $$$ on NVDA and aren't ready to cash out yet. 

Fatbat

Posted

Shōta signing would have been do able but the rest can play out just as it has. We will see some growing pains this year but I really like the health and young age of the team. They will be exciting for years as they grow together. The ‘24 roster has a nice mix of vets and young guns.  No Gallos standing in the way of the next rookie up. 

JD-TWINS

Posted

Imanaga would be a better fit than Burnes since the $$ are similar but there’s more years with Imanaga & no loss of trade assets. ……..Burnes probably more dominant but 1 year of a guy is a real clubhouse mess. ALL season there will be questions to the Team & the player about an extension or why there hasn’t been an extension, etc.

To me Rhys Hoskins is not special and blocks others. Santana at 1/3 the cost - a good fit from the right side in a platoon - a very good defender at 1B. Buxton will need to DH fairly often to keep him healthy through 6 months. He and Hoskins would be conflicting at DH. Kirilloff had a 117 OPS+ with 20HR probability with 500+ AB’s. Santana had 23HR in ‘23 so he’s got solid power in a platoon. Hoskins doesn’t get enough starts for the spend as only 25-30% of pitchers will be LH…….Miranda bounces back at the plate this year & then has nowhere to play in ‘25……a lesser issue.

I think, in hindsight, that Twins offense is fine.

Still could trade DeSclafani to free up $4M……Clevinger has to be available at near $15M/yr for two years. This way, still possible btw, they add a #3 (type) guy and only have a total spend of $133M……..adding $11M to the existing $122M.

Karbo

Posted

1 hour ago, JD-TWINS said:

Imanaga would be a better fit than Burnes since the $$ are similar but there’s more years with Imanaga & no loss of trade assets. ……..Burnes probably more dominant but 1 year of a guy is a real clubhouse mess. ALL season there will be questions to the Team & the player about an extension or why there hasn’t been an extension, etc.

To me Rhys Hoskins is not special and blocks others. Santana at 1/3 the cost - a good fit from the right side in a platoon - a very good defender at 1B. Buxton will need to DH fairly often to keep him healthy through 6 months. He and Hoskins would be conflicting at DH. Kirilloff had a 117 OPS+ with 20HR probability with 500+ AB’s. Santana had 23HR in ‘23 so he’s got solid power in a platoon. Hoskins doesn’t get enough starts for the spend as only 25-30% of pitchers will be LH…….Miranda bounces back at the plate this year & then has nowhere to play in ‘25……a lesser issue.

I think, in hindsight, that Twins offense is fine.

Still could trade DeSclafani to free up $4M……Clevinger has to be available at near $15M/yr for two years. This way, still possible btw, they add a #3 (type) guy and only have a total spend of $133M……..adding $11M to the existing $122M.

I agree with you except for 1 big if, AK staying healthy. If he does then maybe he puts up those kind of numbers. I hope for him and the team he does.

Brandon

Posted

Signing a pitcher for 4 years when we have Lopez for 4, Ryan, and Ober for 4 as well and Paddack for 2 and Varland for 6 with more on the way.  We only need 1 starter for 1 year.  
on Offense we needed 1 bat and Santana is fine.  I think JD Martinez would be a good fit if he plays some first base so there’s can DH too.  The Twins did a great job on the bench and bullpen.  Also on adding 3 prospects including a top 100 and a draft pick.  For what they were given, (a.mandate to cut payroll, they did a great job). San Diego is still working to balance their budget and build their team.  

Rosterman

Posted

We all have dream trades. Better yet, we want free agents to be signed. Yet there is always the aspect of: Does THAT free-agent want to sign and play for the Twins, no matter what the Twins might pay. Do they even listen to an offer (which usually isn't high).

The Twins do have a nice core of pitchers who will be around for 2025, and three that could be around at least another two seasons. Which sets up nice for the Twins advancing a rookie into he mix each of the next few years. So picking up an arm (or two) for a season with the hopes of getting at least 20-24 starts out of them is the Twins priority at best. And they pretty much did that this season. They could still add someone not ready to start the season, like a Jake Odorizzi (or Rich Hill). But got another week or two of spring games before any panic that they don't have five starters for the first month of the season.

They sure did manage to grab enough bullpen arms between those signed strictly for the majors and a few stashed at St. Paul.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...