Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

KirbyDome89

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,562

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by KirbyDome89

  1. KirbyDome89
    I also read it as preaching patience for the current FO as well, maybe it wasn't. I can chop 3 IF singles, go 3-4, score a couple runs, and the team wins. Goal accomplished, we picked up the W. Can I rely on that outcome night after night? Unless you can convince me this FO has a crystal ball that perfectly, and consistently, predicts how to build flawed rosters that can eek out a division title and then go on lengthy playoff runs I'm out. Honestly. I hope they do win the WS. I also can't overlook some of the obvious failures when it comes to building a team. I think the process should consistently yield better results than a barely above .500 club clinging to a small lead in an atrocious division, during a stretch where they're trying to win. Is that goal really a radical departure?
  2. KirbyDome89
    I'm aware of what WAR measures. You introduced team wins as your metric for determining the success of moving established MLB talent for prospects. What I'm asking you is whether or not Cleveland's success is attributable entirely to those moves. You haven't answered that. You spit out a WAR comp between MLB players and their prospect counterparts without any parameters other than a floor and then ranted about how you "know the facts." Are they winning because they move players, or is that merely part of it? I vote the latter. All this supposed data and knowledge yet no FO has scooped you up yet. Their loss right?
  3. KirbyDome89
    "It takes years to see results," after 7 seasons at the helm is most definitely shifting the goalposts. MN entering the postseason is entirely a product of the division in which they play. This is a massively flawed roster, on the back of two consecutive down seasons due in large part to other massively flawed rosters. I'm not saying this regime is devoid of any success, so sure, celebrate those accomplishments. Why, as a fan, would I not want them to win playoff games? SP seems like their best route to doing that but maybe they reverse course and out hit their opponent, but that's not really the point. I'm less enamored with 2023 postseason results when the process once again seems faulty. Idk how, after 7 seasons, that's shifting the goalposts.
  4. KirbyDome89
    A risk worth taking rather than locking yourself into an underwhelming product. Lol, we're 7 years deep and still shifting the goalposts on results?
  5. KirbyDome89
    I don't understand why 2 wins in October should determine their job status if the 162 prior to that have been subpar. If the team continues to play as they have, backing into a division title or even winning a WC series on the back of great SP shouldn't negate how uninspiring the product has been for the last 2+ years.
  6. KirbyDome89
    Yeah, that was the point of my response, they've slow played injuries, so Kirilloff getting a day off and then being reinserted into the lineup doesn't mean the shoulder injury "isn't anything serious." Idk if the Twins have released any news since he had the MRI.
  7. KirbyDome89
    It bothered him for the last week. He sat out last Wednesday, they had Thursday off, and he was placed on the IL Sunday. I don't think that timeline has any bearing on the seriousness of the injury.
  8. KirbyDome89
    Lance Lynn and Noah Syndergaard were both moved. You don't think there was a market for Gray or Maeda? If you don't think you're going anywhere this year sell your expiring contracts. If winning is a priority at least upgrade around the margins (RP, RH OFer) at a nominal cost and increase your chances of securing that oh so important playoff berth. I don't understand why anybody is defending this FO's decision to do nothing with the massively flawed roster they built.
  9. KirbyDome89
    Source?
  10. KirbyDome89
    Neither party may have realized how potentially serious it was. Also, the Twins definitely have a history of being late to IL/DL guys so I wouldn't say I'm shocked.
  11. KirbyDome89
    Are player for prospect swaps directly correlated to MLB wins? Idk why you won't answer the question if you've got such an advantage in this debate. Is Cleveland winning games because they're doing this, or as I said earlier, are there other variables being ignored? Wins measuring team success was never a point I made, hence it's a strawman. Same goes for the "trades for prospects yield 5x the WAR as trades for established players," snippet, and that's assuming you aren't larping on an internet forum.
  12. KirbyDome89
    Strawman. Do you believe that trading MLB talent with years of control, for prospects, correlates directly with team wins or losses?
  13. KirbyDome89
    1. The trade landscape by definition will always change. It's literally the job of a FO to adjust. Idk how this can possibly be an excuse for getting nothing done. 2. Cleveland sold so MN can be content to do nothing? Coasting to a crown in an awful division misses the point. They know they'll have to play somebody other than KC, Detroit, Chicago, or Cleveland in the postseason right? 3. The roster that this FO built isn't worth investing in? If they really feel that way then lets cut bait now...
  14. KirbyDome89
    The fact that the metric you're using isn't close to being a direct correlation?
  15. KirbyDome89
    Was the price for some of those available arms really unreasonable? I'd guess this FO didn't get the green light, which flies in the face of their public comments, but Idk how you look at the current pen, knowing that Stewart has a MRI today, and do nothing.
  16. KirbyDome89
    Stewart has a setback Saturday, they schedule a MRI for today, and then they stand pat. Make it make sense...
  17. KirbyDome89
    Ah so we'll continue to ignore it? I thought we were being objective....
  18. KirbyDome89
    Moving into the upper echelon of contenders (and I'm using that term lightly) wasn't the goal. Shoring up a faltering pen and/or adding a RH bat was doable. Sure they can **** around and win this atrocious division without either, but doing nothing might be worse than selling SP or acquiring either of the above.
  19. KirbyDome89
    I don't want to listen to you preach about objectivity if you're going to purposely ignore other variables involved in getting to your 90 win standard.
  20. KirbyDome89
    Keeping one of the few productive (and young) hitters on an inept offensive squad doesn't make sense? I'm criticizing the notion that constantly shipping out established major league talent is a necessary evil, particularly at their current payroll.
  21. KirbyDome89
    What else is that FO going to tell their fans? "Hey guys, I know we're only .5 games back but ownership is cheap as ****, so we picked up a replacement for Naylor when we inevitably have to trade him in a year or two."
  22. KirbyDome89
    They scored 2 or fewer runs in 5/6 games against Baltimore post "meeting," and went 2-4. Why are we using the ASB as a cutoff if "the meeting," has had such a profound effect on the hitting? Playing half your games post June against KC, Oakland, and Chicago (three of the worst pitching staffs in baseball) probably has a lot more to do with the turnaround....
  23. KirbyDome89
    They definitely sold high on Civale, but that 1B hasn't seen a big league pitch so spark plug for them seems like a stretch but ya never know I guess. McKenzie and Bieber aren't coming back anytime soon (if at all) this season. To me this was a clear "sell," on 2023.
  24. KirbyDome89
    How is trading 2.5 years of Civale for a prospect considered buying?
  25. KirbyDome89
    But that roll of the dice isn't a small gamble. This isn't replacing Joey Gallo with Trevor Larnach. The step down from Gray to Keuchel is massive.
×
×
  • Create New...