Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Original_JB

Verified Member
  • Posts

    569
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Original_JB

  1. Michael Cuddyer: In Minn .272 .343 .451 .794 In Col .307 .362 .525 .886 In NYM (granted last year in MLB) .259 .309 .391 .699
  2. Louise Pohlad, without whom we probably wouldn't be having this discussion. Tony O. The smile alone. Our version of Mr. Baseball Hrbek The "one of us" made good Killer 'from the beginning' Puckett 'climb on my back' and 'we'll see you tomorrow night" Other than being a good player, Mauer just doesn't instill or evoke emotions in me the way gazing at such a monument should.
  3. Perhaps in the competitive balance award money there could be some sort of wins/payroll algorithm where if you aren't spending money and you aren't winning you get less than teams that aren't spending money and are winning. So put some sort of value on regular season wins. Keeps teams from eating too many bad contracts on injured/bad players just to reach some arbitrary 'floor'.
  4. And actually being favored in a game or series would be nice as well, as opposed to being a speed bump.
  5. Except it won't. If there are teams spending $200M+ a year on payroll, making a $50M payroll team spend $100M/yr isn't going to fly because truly, what is there to gain? Will (should) they be a incrementally better team? Should be. But MLB isn't a game of increments. You either qualify for the playoffs (and its $$$), or you don't. The only way the floor works is if they expand the playoffs to the point where it minimizes the financial risk of spending the money. Unless, of course, MLB goes "all in" and pools 100% of the television revenue and splits it evenly amongst the teams. Then you're talking bout enough money to restructure the entire league to a whole different pay structure (becomes a true "league" as opposed to a collection of independent contractors working under a pact).
  6. Why not go with a 4 year 'rolling average' type floor. That gives teams time/room to build for the 'windows' method many teams feel they must use.
  7. I only love this deal if there are 2 more "real" SP's to be signed/acquired by the Twins, otherwise, Pohlads/St.Peter signed the guy "the fans wanted", at a price 'they' liked and as such can consider their work 'done' outside of the retreads to fill out the rotation. You can't bring back a guy you already have with a shiny new contract and claim that you spent big money (like you would have with a free agent) and call it a day.
  8. That's the thing; for the money+player/prospect Segura would require for one year of service @$16M ($14.85M +$1M buyout), you could probably re-sign Simmons to a 2 year deal, figuring he is still great (not as good as at one time, but still) in the field, and most likely recovers somewhat at the plate. Doesn't cost you any prospects and gives you a controllable body at a reasonable rate at the deadline next year if things don't pan out. The question is, is he a good mix in the clubhouse? We've heard a variety of things this past season. Throw this idea completely out the window if there were personality clashes, aloofness, or whatever you want to call a "bad" teammate personality-wise.
  9. Can (would) JD play/platoon 1B?
  10. Not that I want him back, but did I miss an article somewhere where the Twins have stated they're moving on from him?
  11. Baldelli pulling Berrios at 84 pitches with a no-hitter going comes to mind. (and yes, I realize it's early in the season after a shortened season and he wants to be 'careful' with his pitchers, but still).
  12. Read the headline, thought about it for a few seconds and said to myself C-, read the article and saw you came to the same conclusion. The reason I went that 'high' is he did seem to keep the team from just going through the motions, and kept the clubhouse from imploding I guess; but from a "baseball" acumen, I guess I believe that you shouldn't be losing games because of poor managerial decisions, and we had a boatful of those.
  13. Think about who is doing the advertising. It is known as "selling hope", and the Twins have that skill running in perpetual motion. For all the touting, truly, how many "MLB Stars" have been developed and come out of the Twins organization over the last 25 years?
  14. The Twins are also sending cash. I just hope it's less than $10M.
  15. Let's be honest, the Twins didn't outscout or trick anyone with the Maeda deal. Maeda's contract is what had the FO salivating. $3M a year? For how many years? His ERA could have been 5+ and he would have still been on his way here.
  16. Not that he wasn't a 'good' player, but I don't want to see Dave Kingman 2.0.
  17. What would be a fair over/under number for the # of games that Donaldson, Simmons, Polanco, and Buxton are on the field together? 100? This team will only be stalwarts defensively --- if they are actually on the field.
  18. So final 5 will be? (not in any order) Lewis Kirilloff Berrios Maeda Rogers
  19. https://twitter.com/DWolfsonKSTP/status/1344027870289682437 With those specific "games finished" incentives in his contract, do you think that he has been signed to be or promised an opportunity to close, or more of a "well, if you end up using me as a closer, I'd like to be paid like one" clause, with no specific promises having been made by the Twins?
  20. You mean something crazy like getting fleeced in a trade for Max Scherzer?
  21. My initial thought on that was the lions/tigers in Gladiator, chained to a leash. Are you not entertained?
  22. No, no, and more no. Let the game monitor itself. Like others have said, it's on the batters to adapt to to this (not so) new defensive strategy. I'm not sure how you can legislate teams to not optimize their defensive plans based on 'real' numbers. Will they come back with 'oh, it's a short fence in left field at Fenway, so you can only have 3 RH batters in your line-up', because how is that any different? Let Manfred create his own off-season game where you don't even have defense in the field, you just paint it up and electrify it like the Marlins HR atrocity, sort of like they have at TopGolf.
×
×
  • Create New...