MLR, I’m responding to yours because it’s the most convenient and because you’ve conveniently listed the starter options.
24 / 23 / 27 / 11(+4)/ 0 / 5(+23) / 1(+22) / 5 / 11 (+6) / 0(+6)
That’s the number of starts those 10 guys had last year (including the minors in parentheses).
In summary, that’s three guys with 23+ starts in the majors; two with 23+ starts, but most of them in the minors; two guys with 15-17 starts (about one-third of them in the minors); a guy who missed the season and is coming off TJS; a guy with 5 starts, but not available until August because of TJS; and a guy with 6 minor league starts.
All in all, I’m actually relatively encouraged by the potential strength and depth that group provides. But the only ones that feel like true locks are Ryan and Gray (and I’ll give you Mahle, though he did miss the last month-plus). I like Maeda. A lot. To my knowledge, I was the first person to suggest him as a trade target in an offseason blueprint. But I now find it interesting that a bunch of people seem to be using his presence, coming back from TJS, as a reason we don’t want an injury-prone Wacha.
Folks have been clamoring for “ceiling.” That’s what Wacha presents. If you say, “What have you done for me lately,” he would arguably be the Opening Day starter if you consider starts (as many Mahle and Gray, a few fewer than Ryan), ERA+ (matching Gray, significantly better than Ryan or Mahle) and bWAR (0.9 more than any of them). He has always been highly regarded, a No. 1 draft pick, and at one point, we would have been clamoring to pick him up.
Look, it always comes down to “at the right price.” I don’t see any of us advocating for a three-year deal. Only some of us are suggesting two years, which is what MLBTR predicted (at $8M/yr.). That he hasn’t gotten that yet makes one wonder whether that’s a bit high. If they could get him for something like $8M for one year, with $1M bonuses for 18, 21, 24 and 27 starts, maybe with a $1M option for a similar figure that vests at 24 starts, I think it would be worth taking a shot.
In my mind, one of several things happens:
Maeda isn’t at full strength, Paddack isn’t back, etc. The added depth Wacha provides will be helpful — that list of 10 guys is now down to eight.
He pitches great, as do others. If so, he was worth it, because the team is probably in contention.
He pitches great, others don’t. He’s a significant trade chip. His 16 or so starts by the deadline won’t have significantly limited the opportunity for young guys, since they will still get chances when other guys stink.
He pitches poorly, others pitch great. He may still be a trade chip, because teams like “stuff.” Also, the team has actually shown a willingness to dump guys (Reed, Duffey, etc.) when they are on the last year of a contract and they have alternatives to use (Bundy and Archer don’t count — they didn’t realistically have options that were ready last midsummer). If Ober/SWR/Varland are beating down the door while Wacha struggles, I think they’d drop him.
He pitches poorly, others also stink or are hurt (including the young ones). They needed the body.
And finally, remember that deals don’t happen in a vacuum. If signing Wacha gives them the freedom use another pitcher for a SS upgrade, for example, that’s also a win.