Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

IndianaTwin

Verified Member
  • Posts

    6,421
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by IndianaTwin

  1. I get annoyed with all the arguments about how to define an “ace,” but in that spirit, I don’t see what you’re describing as a “rebuild” if all you’re trading is Polanco, Kepler, Maeda, Gray and Pagan. And given that you’d be trading several of these at a point of low value, why bother? You’re not going to get much now, and thus not much less if you do it later. Conversely, you might actually get more later if any of them have a good first half. Plus, if they have a good first half, they’ve also potentially addressed an existing need. And if so, the team may actually be in the race. And if any them has had a good first half, but the team isn’t in the race, there’s probably a higher level of urgency on the part of trade partners than there is now. And at that point, they can trade several of them and open the Falvey Levine Buffet to also include Gallo and others among the offerings. So add me to the “no” column.
  2. Except that I think outbidding the deals the other three got would have been even sillier than offering Correa more.
  3. I saw you went to Garrett. Where did your father-in-law go?
  4. Here’s a “must see” when in New York: https://www.firstpizza.com Get a Clam Pie.
  5. “Have received interest” speaks to other teams doing their due diligence. I don’t have a problem with that, but it’s hardly news. I’d think it’s a bigger problem if the team has a rotation that other teams don’t have interest in.
  6. It's a little scary when I say that a few of us are dating ourselves with these references, and I'm including myself in the same age category as @USAFChief.
  7. Nah, it's an automatic, so I use my right foot on both pedals.
  8. Cool. I'll be 57 in a couple months, and I can hit 75 on the gun as well. I mean, I drive a 2004 Honda Accord, so it takes a few seconds to get there, but I can do it!
  9. As implied above, the two main reasons Swanson isn’t Correa are that he ain’t gonna need $300M and he ain’t gonna need 13 years. Given the FO’s desire for flexibility, I’d still like to sign him. I like Farmer and I get that Lewis will be ready soon, but the ability to use Farmer at both SS and 3B, Lewis and Lee coming, and possibility of moving Swanson to 2B in a couple years when Polanco leaves are all valuable.
  10. What about the Mystery Team? Isn’t there always a Mystery Team?
  11. I’m not that hung up about a lefty/righty balance. It’s not that they ignore platooning, but my sense is that the catcher rotation is much more about balancing workload and days off than it is about the opposing pitcher’s handedness.
  12. Ah, there was not a lot of Versatile in the area where I grew up, so I'm not as familiar with that profile or model numbering scheme. Beef or dairy? I grew up milking about 60, which for the time and place was a pretty decent number. Now, not so much -- I visited a 2400-head dairy operation near Freeman a few weeks ago.
  13. I get it -- as a kid, I mowed too much hay in an International 966 with a non-working air conditioner. So what model is that under the stylish paint job?
  14. Awesome idea. Please tell me you’re driving the tractor on all those miles.
  15. I was going to say, "Oh, no. Not another 'ace' story," but then I saw that Mahle pitched over 400 innings for the Reds last year. Anyone who can do that is definitely an ace! But seriously, are we going to all Jose Berrios on Mahle discussions for the next two years?
  16. And that's part of why Strider isn't a great comparison. He's more than two years younger than Ryan. With extension, Atlanta can keep Strider through age 30. Twins already control Ryan past that point.
  17. Looks like the prices are well over $25, so shipping is included as long as you don’t need it in two days.
  18. I thought of the fact that I hadn't identified someone as a longer relief guy. However, I do think that last year's shorter starts were an injury-based aberration, based on prior years' starter usage patterns when the Twins were more or less at league average. I also considered several other factors. First, I think the overall rotation will be stronger than a year ago, so there will be fewer really short starts. Second, they don't have an Archer in the mix, which was a guaranteed start of no more than five and often just four innings. The possible exception is Maeda. However, if he's indeed not up to a normal starter's workload, he's someone who does actually have the experience of being a several-inning guy in the bullpen. Third, my bullpen has a lot of experience, including guys who are more used to going on back-to-back days than last year's bullpen was. Finally, with the overall strength of this bullpen, they can afford to shift a guy like Jax to being a two-inning guy on occasion. With this year's experience, they couldn't do that, since they couldn't afford to use him up for a couple days.
  19. You did read me correctly, and apparently I've misunderstood that part. With your understanding, plus the $800k from my mistakenly including Cave, I'm adding Fulmer to the bullpen as well.
  20. There are a number of guys, including Pagan, who have no contract information other than the years of control. I see that on other teams as well, and all of them seem to be people who are in the arbitration window. It's not all people in the arbitration window, but there's enough of them that I read it as "incomplete." And I know that being a catcher has value, but it's hard for me to believe that two years of Jansen is worth six years of Lewis or Miranda. I was also basing my comment off this tweet. It's a tweet, so who knows what "far more interest" means, but it suggests that he's seen as having at least some value. I should have been more clear in my original post in saying that it would take more than Pagan, but I'd like to think his inclusion would soften the prospect inclusion need.
  21. I’m going off the word on the street that says teams have expressed interest in Pagan, along with assuming there would need to be some level of prospect inclusion.
  22. Thanks. I knew, but missed that. Guess that frees up a little to make sure Chapman fits!
×
×
  • Create New...