Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,384
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    338

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. totally fair. That still leaves Duffey. And Oliveras. And Achter. And Rogers.
  2. I don't understand the fear of using Duffey or Berrios in the 7th/8th. Just because they aren't "proven closers" doesn't mean they can't do the job. We are pretty sure the current guys can't (or aren't allowed for some reason) do the job, why not try something else?
  3. I don't really see this as a dilemma. I see it as some kind of odd, stubborn, refusal to use their assets to help the MLB team.
  4. Ironically, given his injury risk, I'd deal him if I could, for 3 guys I thought were MLB players.....Berrios, Polanco and someone? I'd do that if I was them. They are terrible right now....
  5. Age and injury are the only thing that make it possible to get him, imo. If he was 2 years younger and healthy? No chance....
  6. But I'd have Esco there.....so the negative WAR is zero nana nana, boo boo, I win! Sorry, on an awful work call, really needed to be silly for a second.....
  7. But they have May and Berrios......and then in AAA they have two number 4/5 types when someone needs time off next year.....
  8. If only the Twins agreed, and would not sign 40 year old OFers, keep Pelfrey in the lineup, sign Suzuki to an extension.........give some AAA pitchers a shot in the bullpen.....if only they agreed, Nick.
  9. Except they aren't playing with their own parts...... Polanco is in the minors. NONE of the AAA starters are being tried as RP (heck, neither are the RP) Arcia is down for a 40 year old to play May is doing nothing, while Pelfrey pitches (and the other BP pitch) They didn't play with their pieces last year, they aren't this year. It isn't their style.
  10. Used to listen to Aaron, but since he decided to ridicule me for participating on his site, after asking for more participation, and for suggesting they do a live podcast, which they did a few weeks later, well, I'd prefer not to give him my time.....
  11. This part isn't an argument that it is for 1 year? "And I don't think it's a prudent move to give up a significant portion of the farm to play a game that essentially gives a 50/50 chance of reaching a five game series." btw, I agree, it is risky.......but I have seen plenty of the Twins' prospects lately to think maybe, just maybe, they aren't all that great, and dealing a bunch of maybes for Tulo is a good idea. I see where others disagree.....
  12. Except I don't buy it is a 1 year deal, but you keep arguing it is. IMO, it helps A TON with next year and the year after also......
  13. That's all fair.......sure doesn't instill much confidence in next year either.....year what of the rebuild that isn't a rebuild?
  14. Isn't Sano the DH? If he's the 3B, then you have Plouffe to get a C........w/o giving up any prospects to do so. You expect them to acquire another SP from outside? I don't. they won't be spending tens of millions on the bullpen, will they? Tulo does fix SS....moving it from the WORST position player in all of baseball, to one of the best. That's a big swing, imo.
  15. I'm not the one saying they'll find a SS and C that are good in FA next year....you won't find me typing that for sure. Others are saying one of the reasons not to acquire Tulo is that they need that money for signing a SS and a C......
  16. What is their record against those teams in MN? Is it that different? How do they play on the road in general compared to these teams?
  17. The FA list is a known quantity right now. If he manages to spend $20MM on a SS and C, something bad happened. As for a trade, it is possible, sure, but that has nothing to do with signing FAs, which is what I thought we were discussing.
  18. Great, I'd love a big deal for an elite player in the off season. I don't see that happening either......btw, I don't see anyone arguing for trading for a 2 month rental in most of these threads.
  19. It isn't that they won't spend money, it is that there isn't a SS or C worth spending money on as a FA. Look at the lists......just plain bad. And, he has bought 4 medium priced pitchers, but not one ace type that is going to cost 20MM per year for 5-7 years (nor am I saying he should).
  20. Where are they spending that next offseason? Not on a FA SS or C. Not on an elite SP. Probably not on an OF or 3B or 1B or 2B. Where is that money going? Which 3-4 guys are they going to rotate thru? They aren't rotating Arcia through, or any of the SP in AAA that could be RP. They aren't rotating the worst position player in MLB with another guy. I'm not making these suggestions in a vacuum, I'm looking at how Ryan and Molitor are using their options today, and drawing the conclusion that we are not getting a lot of rotating/testing. They didn't do it last year, they aren't doing it this year.
  21. More risky: relying on guys never having played in the majors, or relying on Tulo?
  22. It's a fair stance to take, if you think Santana is a prospect to be a legit MLB SS. I don't share that belief, but if that is their belief, I am glad that they are sticking with it. My choice would be to go with Escobar, who is about the same level prospect in my mind.
  23. You can be more talented and win less games.......just look at the As this year.......
  24. so they'll be more than 9 games over .500 at the ASB?
×
×
  • Create New...