Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Is Kluber better than anyone on the roster? He's depth at this point, isn't he? I mean, look at the deal he got. It is clear teams don't think all that much of him.
  2. Agreed. 1000000%.
  3. There is a study out there showing that teams that trade more often get better faster than teams that are afraid to lose trades and sit pat..... I'd trade him, but I really don't think they will.
  4. Sucks. I hope he recovers somehow
  5. Agreed
  6. I'm not sure what any of that has to do with them now not spending, which is what we were talking about. Who are they going to spend money on now?
  7. Who else is out there to sign that is better than what they have on the roster?
  8. I'm sure Next Year they'll sign a big time free agent....... Not.
  9. I'd have gone 2/40 easy. But it's clear the owners are pocketing money this year without a trade for an expensive player.
  10. I suggest watching every episode of that show. Truly amazing tv.
  11. While I don't agree with a lot in this thread..... The owners will never spend like fans want. No FO ever has, that's not on the FO. As for spending, they don't always spend near the middle, and right now I see no way they will this coming year. All that money goes into their pocket, never to be seen by players or staff again. I have little sympathy for ownership given the year to year way they run the payroll. But, I don't expect it to ever be better. So I usually criticize decisions of the front office, because those can change.
  12. It's ownership. Every FO has operated the same.
  13. They have four drafts they could have found a pitcher. Some of that had to be used on hitting. They traded part of that for Gray, but that doesn't count. They traded for Ryan. Does anyone think TB thought Ryan would be this good, for 2.5 months of a hitter? I would hope they had one more established starter by now....but no one trusts a guy that debuted last year, so that's actually three drafts (since the last three don't count, as no one is up from the last two, and apparently we don't trust rookies, which, given the data, makes sense. Less than half of rookie starters are good more than a year or two later.....). So, how many do you expect in three years? I was hoping for 1.
  14. Of the three, Martin is the only one in that last that "needs to prove something." Prielipp hasn't even pitched yet....I have no idea how he's on this list. Severino and Javier could be on this list. And, as someone said above, Jordy B (not even going to try to spell his name).
  15. How many pitchers would you expect them to have "fixed" in 6 years of drafting (no player taken in the last two years is in the majors)? I'm guessing you'll see Ober, Varland, and SWR in the majors this year. Dobnak, before getting hurt, was exactly this pitcher. We all forget how good he was two years ago. Then there is Ryan. So many injuries the last few years.....Oh, and they traded one of those guys for Gray. Which clearly reduces the pipeline. This doesn't count Jax or Duran in the bullpen.
  16. do what? like, what is your actual issue?
  17. Facts, what are they good for?
  18. wut? Is this a real post?
  19. Kepler over .300? I'll take the under.
  20. I don't know..... Three years of Polanco (above average 2B signed to a good deal) Trade Kepler for a prospect in the 4-10 range for Boston. A guy that should fill the back of your rotation for 6 years (Varland). For one year of a player? Heck, they can likely deal Polanco for 2 good prospects if they really want. I'd do that if I'm Boston all day. Three years of Polanco and 6 of Varland is a lot of certainty compared to getting a couple highly rated prospects. That said, if Boston is punting the next couple years, I'd rather get Lee and Varland than Polanco and Varland. But I think people are over-estimating what you can get for 1 year of a player (unless you are dealing with a team that is certain to extend him, like SD or Seattle or NYY).
  21. I don't think 11 MM is the issue, it's three years for a RP that was hurt the last two.
  22. At this point? I probably go with the young guys. This roster isn't constructed to win it all, I don't think. May was well see what they have. Also, guys with options allow them to send guys up and down when there are issues, whereas these guys don't. But, if they sign a couple, I'm also ok with that.
×
×
  • Create New...