Jump to content
If free agency is too rich for your blood, click here for the 35 players most likely to be traded this offseason. ×
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    48,925

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    It's possible sano want fixable. It's possible it takes more than one injured year to fix Jeffers. Or maybe it just requires health.....
  2. Mike Sixel
    They've signed zero. That's intentional. They traded middling prospects for a guy with two years left, twice. Again, not their best, and not for long term fixes.
  3. Mike Sixel
    Minnesota has the softest defense ever?
  4. Mike Sixel
    The Twins have no player I'd do that for right now. Like who?
  5. Mike Sixel
    Agreed. I have no idea how this is a good idea. People seem desperate for moves, or content.
  6. Mike Sixel
    This point is key. Their refusal to sign big time free agent pitchers, and unwillingness to trade their best protects for guys with more than two years of control, means they have to trade for prospects and develop prospects. That's a fine strategy, but they aren't following it. If they were, Arraez or Kepler would be dealt for pitching prospects......
  7. Mike Sixel
    Seems likey those 17 aren't the issue ...
  8. Mike Sixel
    Not even close. Other than the Guardians, none of those teams were good at any point last year.
  9. Mike Sixel
    Good one. Let me know when they do that with the millions they don't spend.
  10. Mike Sixel
    That's nearly half the league. This myth that the others can't spend is bunk. 100% bunk.
  11. Mike Sixel
    ?
  12. Mike Sixel
    Not at all. And, what free agent is as good?
  13. Mike Sixel
    I don't know what will happen, but if this team is healthy and they don't blow the vast majority of one run games, they win the division last year. The SP and RP is better to start this year than last year..... So, sure, they could win. That's why I don't believe for one minute they are trading Kepler or anyone else.
  14. Mike Sixel
    5 Vikings SB victories.
  15. Mike Sixel
    Wut?
  16. Mike Sixel
    Ok, thanks. Who of those that are left would you sign at this point?
  17. Mike Sixel
    We clearly didn't understand your either or statement then. What did it mean? Because both of us thought you were saying they could spend elsewhere. Our bad.
  18. Mike Sixel
    The Twins are better off with Gallo and a prospect, than with Kepler and 2.5 million they won't spend.
  19. Mike Sixel
    The leverage didn't change. That's just not how it works. And, does he really? come on.
  20. Mike Sixel
    I'll take that bet, but I'm 58, so I might not be here in twenty years.
  21. Mike Sixel
    No issue. I was just clarifying, since I was unclear
  22. Mike Sixel
    People keep saying this, and every contract is higher
  23. Mike Sixel
    So, you get the same player plus a prospect, that's a win. I remain convinced they aren't trading Kepler
  24. Mike Sixel
    This.
  25. Mike Sixel
    The asking price didn't change. Why would it?
×
×
  • Create New...