Jump to content
Our MLB mock draft board has updated! Who do we have the Twins taking with the 3rd pick? ×
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    46,391

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    Should we also take out the best players other teams sign, and see how they look in FA? Of course bad things happened, but you can't just throw out all the good stuff and say "see, they are bad at this". that said, I'm a year from doing so.....as I'm not in love with a lot of what they've done. IMO, the big mistake was thinking they could keep signing 2 FA starters and half a bullpen every year, rather than trading for a guy under control or signing a FA for more than 1-2 years. I think people also forget that the minor league season was cancelled last year. Kind of hard to move a SP from A or even one who got to AA late in 19, to the majors this year, let alone at the start of this year...... Which is my biggest issue with this season (now). They aren't promoting guys so that they can be in MN early next year, setting themselves up to have to acquire too much pitching again (which they'll hold onto because they are ok, rather than promoting guys that might be good or better).
  2. Mike Sixel
    They brought up 3 top 100 prospects (depending on how you feel about Jeffers) this year.....one of whom is hurt. That isn't a young core? They also have Arraez and Polanco, and Rortverdt ready in AAA if needed. How many new players do you want added every year? I'll give you the pitching, they have failed there so far..... Maybe I'm not clear.....I'm not "giving them credit" or saying there are good....I am saying we don't know yet. It takes A LONG time to develop a pitching pipeline. Like, next year ........ We are pretty clearly at an impasse. You've made up your mind, I haven't. I'm ok with that.
  3. Mike Sixel
    29 teams have no idea how the Rays do it....how many WS have the Rays won, btw? And I don't get giving them zero credit for the good years. Almost zero teams are great every year...expecting this team to do that right away (and after the pandemic) seems like you and others are setting yourselves up for disappointment.
  4. Mike Sixel
    Ya, this hasn't been 2-3 years in the making at all.....
  5. Mike Sixel
    Maybe I'm not clear....I think we have no idea if they are great at their job or not, and if they don't have legit pitchers up from the system next year, I'll start calling for their jobs......As for the division wins, they literally can only play the games they are scheduled to play, and they won A LOT of them......I fail to see how that isn't impressive after the previous regime was awful at winning.
  6. Mike Sixel
    I agree with that last sentence for sure. When your window is open, leap thru it. You might have injuries, or regression or FAs might want to make more elsewhere......very few people thought this team would be bad, but it is. What if they had gone more all in 2019? We'll never know, as only the McPhail led Twins ever did that (and, what do you know.....it worked!).
  7. Mike Sixel
    None of which were in his second term. He was good the first time, but awful the second time. Which is too bad. He really seems like a nice guy.
  8. Mike Sixel
    Nick Gordon, Kohl Stewart, and Tyler Jay say hi.
  9. Mike Sixel
    People realize the WS traded off stars to get some of the stars they have now, right? That they were building for the future the last few years? That if their plan worked, they'd be good? The Twins built a winner in 19 and 20, and couldn't maintain that. From what I read, that's pretty much to be expected in MLB for mid market or smaller teams.....that you can't win forever unless you have lots of money (and even then.....). I don't love the FO....and I'm not sure if they are great at their job or not....but no, Ryan wasn't building anything good. And yes, this FO took an AWFUL team and won two division championships. They deserve at least one more year to show us they can have a pitching system, imo.
  10. Mike Sixel
    I'd be ok with trading for a number 3 with years of control....but my point remains, Are there teams with no minor league pipeline in place (which it wasn't) acquiring 2 new starters on 1 year deals over and over doing well? They did it for two years, but at some point, it is HARD to do it over and over (sometimes there aren't good FAs in your budget, for example, certainly not often 2). That doesn't even count trying to build a bullpen with only 2-3 returning guys.
  11. Mike Sixel
    So it's their fault the other teams were bad? They won the division twice, after the team was awful under the previous leadership. It really is amazing how some won't give them credit for that. Truly.
  12. Mike Sixel
    You expect a contending team to count on a guy that hasn't played in two years, not even at a high level to play for them? The mistake is Cave over Wade, not Badoo. Imo.
  13. Mike Sixel
    Not a fan of bat first, no fielders, in round one at all. Then this? Very disappointing. The two pitchers are interesting, and the kind I would convert to reliever and move up fast, which is why I'm no GM ...
  14. Mike Sixel
    I agree with the general premise. I also agree with Brock. I'll be honest.... If Burrows is on this roster still, over at least three candidates in AAA, I don't like what they are doing at all. In five years, we still don't have one pitcher, starter or reliever, we are confident in. While there weren't great free agents this year, their inability to trade for or sign guys to longer deals, meant they had to, again, get two new starting pitchers. That's not a sustainable model. Next year is the year they are out of excuses. If there aren't multiple pitchers up from the system after six years...... Also, their emphasis on bat first, mediocre or worse fielders in the draft? Not a fan at all.
  15. Mike Sixel
    I'm all for doing it, just move on after a certain point. And, this happened in Detroit also, not just here. Take chances! But be willing to move on when it doesn't work.
  16. Mike Sixel
    This.
  17. Mike Sixel
    I don't understand how Moran isn't a Twin already.....
  18. Mike Sixel
    Well.... Gordon isn't getting singles either. And he is an ok fielder. He also swings at everything outside the zone. He has zero in common with the players you mentioned. Also, just because we used to not have data before does but mean it isn't useful.
  19. Mike Sixel
    I'm not sure why they'd move Polanco back to SS. He's not good there. He's a legit good 2B. I'm not sure why I mess with that. They do not have a SS in the system. It is priority 2 in FA this year for sure (or trade). That's why you keep playing Simmons. Because Polanco is a 2B. The real question is what is Arraez if Polanco is your 2B?
  20. Mike Sixel
    I'd 100% prefer Thorpe move the bullpen, where he has a much better chance of being a MLB pitcher. Ober, Jax, Dobnak are all as good or better than Thorpe as starters. Give Thorpe a legit shot to be part of the bullpen.
  21. Mike Sixel
    Ya. It was great going up from the bottom....oh well. Just need one drug....
  22. Mike Sixel
    I'd expect a start or two in St. Paul. Then hopefully with the big league club.
  23. Mike Sixel
    I hope Ryan is with the Twins, not saints.
  24. Mike Sixel
    If they want those guys in Minnesota next year, they should be in Minnesota now. How many terrible outings, in addition to his time in Detroit, do they need to see? Great play by Sano!
  25. Mike Sixel
    Guess we can kiss the idea of Winder being in the rotation day one goodbye. At this point B also looks out. Not looking good for the start of next year already, alas.
×
×
  • Create New...