Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,364
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. I don't know. We have no idea why they played better. But awful teams win sometimes, and great ones lose, so I think it's more likely they just played better. And had three important starters back. But I could be wrong!
  2. Except they didnt trade for 9 7th round picks....but yes.
  3. Every one of these guys will get signed by some team. Are they all bad at this?
  4. Fangraphs list of the best: https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2026-top-50-mlb-free-agents/
  5. Prefer the Phillies deal, but it is hard to say w/o knowing what was offered. I don't think the Twins need a bad defensive OFer at this point (or in the next 5 years).
  6. As I said earlier, I'd have worked hard to deal Hockenson and somewhat to deal Addison....but I get why neither was. I would have gladly dealt a mid round pick for a DB, since this FO SUCKS at drafting.....
  7. Also, this is the org that kept Martin at SS for no reason, and is doing so with Winokur....I don't trust them to get more SS.....
  8. Just say no to HS pitchers early in the draft. The track record over decades is just not good. edit to add: Great writeups as always. Thank you.
  9. I really don't know what he could say, realistically, that would matter at all. I agree with that last part, btw....
  10. What do you expect people to say in things like this?
  11. I'm all in on OF and SP, since you need more than 1. Lots more than 1. They have limited assets, and have Culpeper and Houston (and to a lesser extent Lee) they clearly believe in. If I am dealing Ryan, I want OF and SP back, or a C, since they have none after next year basically. You can't play w/o a C. I'm happy to disagree here.....that's ok with me.
  12. He's talking about acquiring a SS that is already in the majors. If that's a good idea, in confused as to the plan for next year. Using one of the best players in the game as an example is silly.
  13. That's a lot to give up
  14. They have limited assets and two SS they believe in. If you need lots of things, you don't use limited assets on things you expect to have in half a year.
  15. It would be insane to use assets to acquire a SS if you have Culpeper and Houston.
  16. Good to see Dallas stink.
  17. I count 35 AA (or more advanced) players ranked 50 or higher by Fangraphs on playoff teams or teams even close to playoffs (no teams in the Twins division included). The Mets have an amazing 6 of those,, three of which are SP. That's your target, IMO. Most teams have 1-3 at most. It will be VERY hard to get multiple highly rated prospects from most teams because of that.....IF you want players that will be in MN in 26 or 27.
  18. Pretty sure there is..... Or should be.
  19. My packer friend says the coach is the real issue.
  20. Interesting. But KOC needs to tell him before those plays not to pass? But then, it's not like they talked..... That would change my thoughts on the coaching.
  21. Mostly in tech..... But I have a large chunk of cash earning 4.5 percent for a few months while I try to figure it what to do with it. Regret a few decisions earlier this year, but overall pretty good, other than unh refusing to recover.
  22. Send impossible. Darnold? Wow.
  23. Still think of they can get a first for Addison they need to do it. If they could get a taker for hockenson, trade him for the salary relief. Though that could wait for the off season. I'd love to deal anything past a third for a DB or two.
×
×
  • Create New...