Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

DJL44

Verified Member
  • Posts

    9,263
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    60

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by DJL44

  1. I am not a big fan of taking innings away from your top 3-4 starters and giving them to your 6th best option, especially since as the season goes on that 6th best option is 9th or 10th on the original depth chart. I don't see reducing the workload of your best pitchers as a positive. It would be great if they could give Lopez, Ryan and Ober more innings if they could maintain the same level of effectiveness. I have actually argued for the opposite. As the number of innings pitched in the actual game shrinks, I'm not convinced pitchers need as much time between games to recover. Relievers don't get 4 days between outings. If the starter goes a maximum of 5 innings they could go to a 4-man rotation. 40 starts of 5 innings is 200 innings for your best pitchers. The whole concept of "rest" is simplistic. MLB pitchers are training on their off days. You can't maintain velocity and avoid injury if you pitch once a week and sit on the couch the rest of the time. If an extra day of training helps improve performance and avoid injury, then I can see teams opting to go to a larger rotation.
  2. Looks like they do now. I didn't see that when the article first came out.
  3. I was surprised they didn't outright Canterino. Not happening. If a team wanted any of these players, they would have taken them when they didn't have to keep the player on the roster all season.
  4. None of the Twins outgoing free agents (Kepler, Santana) made the top 50 list or even the honorable mentions. I wonder just how cheaply Kepler will sign.
  5. Which means they're keeping Henriquez, Topa, Tonkin, Canterino, Keirsey and Helman for the time being. I would have guessed they would outright Canterino.
  6. Lee at 3B, Lewis at 1B and Miranda traded is a perfectly reasonable strategic plan. It might be a year too early to benefit from it because Lee isn't quite ready.
  7. I agree with this assessment. Royce Lewis also matches that description. That means the Twins are going to have to pick one for 3B and a) trade the other OR b) play the other one out of position.
  8. Rockies Journal: Forecasting Colorado's offseason moves If I was going to target a Rockies catcher, I think Jose Miranda and Jorge Alcala would get some interest. There might be a deal here, but I think you have the wrong players to fit their expressed needs.
  9. There was quite a bit of questioning whether Polanco was still a good player. He missed quite a bit of time with injury over the past few seasons.
  10. Why in the world would the Rockies, who want to cut payroll and are a non-contender, do a prospects-for-veterans trade? They're a poorly run organization but they know what cycle of competing they're in. I will also add that Colorado has had more than one opportunity to add Randy Dobnak to their team for the cost of a waiver claim and declined. The Twins will have to attach a prospect of at least $4M value to get rid of Dobnak's contract.
  11. Article after article of "Should the Twins pay this guy 1/4 of what they're worth?"
  12. The Twins don't have a lot of areas with surplus talent at the MLB level. There's 3B (Lewis, Lee, Miranda, Castro), lefthanded hitting corner outfielders (Larnach, Wallner, Rodriguez, Jenkins) and RH relief pitchers. The organization needs lefthanded pitching and catching. The only player I'm pretty sure they'll deal this offseason is Chris Paddack. They can trade either of Castro or Vazquez at the deadline and get the same trade return as they would in the offseason. With the team up for sale I don't see them making big moves. Falvey is not going to do anything risky. He's likely to be looking for a new job when the new owner takes over.
  13. No, I said the Twins should have gone for ALL prospects and not looked for ANY near-term help for 2024 in the Polanco trade. Then they would have had more prospects AND all of the $$ savings. That's far better than non-tendering him. There was a comment from Falvey that the trade was held up so long because they wanted some MLB talent in return. That was the mistake.
  14. I believe a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush leagues (or something like that). The second half of your comment sounds like the advice David Ortiz got from Tom Kelly. Wallner has an elite ability to hit the ball really, really hard. Lean into that.
  15. An equivalent free agent reliever would cost around $6M a season on a multiyear contract. Non-tendering Alcala would be sufficient reason to fire Derek Falvey.
  16. That's completely wrong. Seattle put in cash, not the Twins. Twins trade Jorge Polanco to Mariners in 5-player deal
  17. $5.25M which they would have spent on a different guy like DeSclafani. I don't know why that trade was expected to fill all the holes for 2024. The goal of a trade is to gain more than you give up. If they don't get exactly what they want for 2024 they can make a different trade. It's not like they have a one-transaction-per-offseason limit.
  18. I don't get this. The only thing that cost them anything was the $5M they paid DeSclafani to do nothing. Topa was paid $1.25M (which is nothing) and the prospects are free. If I can get free prospects by exercising an option and trading a player I would do it every time rather than declining the option.
  19. Altuve plays 2B, not SS. He's also an extreme outlier and nothing Eeles has done in AAA suggests he's anywhere near as good as Altuve. Short guys can throw hard, but the scouts say Eeles doesn't. I'm pretty sure they can measure how hard he throws correctly.
  20. He's 5'5" tall. He would be tied for the 5th shortest MLB player ever. There have been SS that short (Rizzuto, Maranville, Patek) but nobody since David Eckstein. The scouts don't think he has the arm for SS and that makes complete sense given his height. That's fine, there's more opportunity on this team at 2B anyway.
  21. In hindsight, Falvey should have gone for more prospects and less MLB ready help.
  22. The Twins won the trade by saving the cash they would have otherwise paid Polanco. They used that money to sign Carlos Santana for one season which puts them way ahead of the Mariners on this trade.
  23. You'll have to find some from a few years ago. According to statcast, Polanco was in the 2nd percentile for range (98% of infielders rated better than him) and 8th percentile for throwing arm (he only throws 75 MPH now). It's pretty clear he's no longer able to play 2B. Jorge Polanco Stats: Statcast, Visuals & Advanced Metrics | baseballsavant.com
×
×
  • Create New...