Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Major League Ready

Verified Member
  • Posts

    7,641
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Major League Ready

  1. Are you having a good day, Mike? Are you going to need a sedative if they get something for Pineda?
  2. Like Blake Snell who many here thought was a no brainer trade who is playing at roughly replacement level or Albert Pujlos who was one of the very best in the game and produced a negative WAR for 5 years straight or Chris Davis who signed a mega deal and has produced -5 WAR or Jason Heyward who has produced 8 WAR in 6 seasons after signing a mega deal. Or Stephen Strausberg who signed for 7/245M and pitched 5 innings in 2020 and 21 IP in 2022. Maybe he will bounce back this one could be disasterous. We could go on and on. Dexter Fowler, David Price, Jacoby Elsbury, Eric Hosmer, Johnny Questo, Ryan Zimmerman, Carl Crawford, Pablo Sandavol, Josh Hamilton, Ryan Howard, Prince Fielder and on and on. We have not even mentioned the very long list of relief pitchers. That would take a while. Yep, sure bet!
  3. We added three very good pithing prospects this week and we are not done yet. We are deep in SP prospects and lean in SS/CF prospects. It is no surprise a guy who could play both SS and CF was part of the package the accepted.
  4. I doubt their chances of signing Berrios changed any today. They were going to need to outbid everyone to sign him and I think that scenario remains the same today. The difference is we add to prospects that individually could be as impactful as Berrios and in Martin's case even more so. The cost is Berrios for 2022.
  5. Hard to argue his "athleticism is unmatched", The part that "his production is unparalleled" even with the caveat "when healthy" is true for a 27 game stretch. I too hope for more of that production but he should not be mentioned in the same breadth as Kirby Puckett where production is concerned at least not at this point. Puckett produced a career WAR of 44.9. Rod Carew produced a career 72 WAR and had a 5 year stretch where he produced 35 WAR.
  6. They definitely have the pieces. Let's hope they are willing to include one of them very high on the list. I just don't know what to expect with how tight teams have been with top prospects. What's realistic from the Jays?
  7. Who here believes the Pineda trade comes in at 2:55 tomorrow afternoon?
  8. I think the Jays or Rays are a good match. The Rays seem to be in a very aggressive state and there has been quite a bit of trade interaction with them the last couple years..
  9. It's unfortunate that both Robles and Colome have sucked. At the risk of stating the obvious, those guys could have brought back something decent.
  10. Ah ha ... I thought you meant what they got for Berrios because there was a bunch of Berrios focused posts. My bad and I absolutely agree on Pineda. I also can't imagine he does not get moved. The one I am wondering about is Robles. I guess it does not matter much because he is not going to bring much back.
  11. How will we know what the alternatives were to what they end up getting? Hard to judge when we don't know what they turned down.
  12. I thought we were talking about pitching. Your argument seems to be they were ranked high but why do we care how they were ranked when we now know how they have performed? What did that system produce for pitching? We can evaluate based on results and that group produced virtually nothing in terms of pitching. We don't know how this group will rate 5 years from now when we can evaluate based on results. I would be willing to bet we get a whole lot more pitching out of the current system plus whoever they get for Berrios/Pineda assuming they are dealt.
  13. No doubt the free agents were not good but a lot of people here speak as if the FO failed to bring in the right guys. Who were the right guys? Were we going to get Wainwright away from STL? James Paxton pitched 1 inning Garret Richards’s ERA is 5.15 Drew Smyly has been decent with a 4.3 ERA but he certainly would not have made a difference Corey Kluber pitched 50 innings and is now on the 60 day IL Charlie Morton has been good but his geographic preference is well known so that was not going to happen. Mike Minor has an ERA of 5.32 Jake Odorizzi has been decent with an ERA of 4.3 but how much difference would he have made. The guy I wanted (Taijuan Walker) has been great but I got no support here when I floated him as a good option. We could have traded for Blake Snell like so many here insisted was a no brainer. We could have given up a bunch of prospects for a near replacement level player. We could have traded for Darvish. He was great the first couple months but he has given up 16 runs in his last 20 innings. We would still be talking about a horrible season even with Darvish so there is a lot more to this failure than our free agents SPs, one of which was a $2M depth play.
  14. I have watched 7 or 8 games now but he has been at 1st for half the games. He looked good at 3B in the limited number of plays I have seen but you make a good point. He is going to rank quite a bit higher if he projects to stick at 3B although I don't mind the flexibility of him being able to play 3 infield positions.
  15. I would argue he has created the pipeline. Balazovic / Duran / Canterino / Ryan / Ober / Winder / Enlow / Sands / Ober / Strotman / Valimont / Varland. I would say the 1st 10 have good shot at being MLB starting pitchers. Valimont and Varland are too far off to tell. That's a better pitching pipeline than when Falvey got here in my opinion. You seem to be saying he has not created MLB players yet which is true. The difference is that the pipeline he inherited produced very little. It's going to take another couple of years to compare the current regime in terms of developing a pitching pipeline.\ BTW ... There might be 2 or even 3 more guys added to that list in the next 24 hours and 13 minutes.
  16. Miranda has to be the bright spot of the season. Winder has been good but in terms of elevating a players ranking, wow! Where doe everyone think ends up in terms of ranking? Is he top 50 if he keeps this up the rest of the year?
  17. How about the Odorizzi trade? I am more upset about Nick Anderson and Tyler Wells then Baddoo. Baddoo had very limited playing time in the previous 2 years and had a handful of ABs above high A. It was not exactly reckless to expect he would not get picked up or that if he would not be ready for the MLB level. It's also easy to point to keeping Jake Cave because fans tend to be very critical of this type of role player but they are valuable to staying in contention.
  18. Are you saying there is not a significant trend away from trading top prospects? I most certainly am not saying there are not deals to be made but I don't consider and Kirilloff to be equivalent prospects. I find it bizarre that you are not aware of the strong preference of other teams to not part with these assets. What is the basis for your support of practices that are being abandoned by other teams? Perhaps more to the point I think trading away a player that profiles like Kirilloff, including years of control for a team with as many holes as this one has would be gross incompetence. Maybe the Twins won't be able to get a reasonable offer for Berrios and he will stay. However, you are going to be disappointed if they get a decent offer. No competent executive is going to make 2022 their Alamo as you defined it in an earlier post. You have the privilege of being indifferent to the long-term. The FO is responsible for the long-term health of the organization and they are going to manage assets accordingly.
  19. Teams are stringently avoiding this practice. Do you know something they don't. I would be interested to hear why we should follow a practice the top teams have clearly avoided.
  20. There are many fans that can't imagine a strategy that does not put heavy weight on 2022. Team's however have learned that short-term focus is a good way to be bad often. The Dodger's are a very good example. Compare how they constructed teams 15 years ago. Of course, their front office has heavy influence from the origin of these strategic practices practices which would be the Tampa Bay Rays. Many fans don't look at all of the factors and determine the optimal strategies to get back to contention. They assume a focus on next year and develop a plan from there. As we have heard here, some fans dislike taking a step in order to improve in the future, even in a losing season. This is not how good teams operate thus the refusal to give up top prospects. The FO is not going to make "2022" their Alamo" unless they believe they are out the door if the team does not contend in 2022. IMO, any baseball executive who looks at this team and goes all-in for 2022 should be terminated. They need 3 starters, one of them at least as good as Berrios, and half the BP needs to be replaced. The lost their best hitter. Short-stop needs to be addressed. Will Sano continue to be a liability? Will Buxton stay on the field and is Larnach going to adapt? I guess we should throw in will age catch up to Donaldson. Is that a scenario in which you go to your board and recommend an all-in strategy?
  21. J.A. Happ is a 15 year veteran with over 1800 IPs. If looking for a reason for his regression, I would be more inclined to believe being 38 years old likely had more influence than his coach.
  22. I would hope this post and my previous posts were not so poorly constructed as to have you would believe I don't understand that a larger payroll is advantageous. My point was that others quite frequently measure the quality of a transaction by the amount spent and present that premise as if it's an obvious fact.
  23. I am really reluctant to trade Kepler given he is under team control (relatively cheap) through 2023. The return has to be substantial. It would also be more acceptable if it included a very good SS or high-end pitching prospects or one of each. Peraza plus pitching from the Yankees could make it worthwhile.
×
×
  • Create New...