-
Posts
1,786 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis
Minnesota Twins Videos
2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings
2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors
Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources
2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
The Minnesota Twins Players Project
2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Rod Carews Birthday
-
Minnesota Twins Mount Rushmore
Rod Carews Birthday commented on Luke Thompson's blog entry in Luke Thompson
How about a Mount Rushmore of Twins pitching seasons? It probably needs a limit of one per pitcher or It might be just Santana and Blyleven! Johan Santana 2006 Bert Blyleven 1973 Frank Viola 1988 Jim Perry 1970 OR Throw in a reliever -- Joe Nathan 2006 -
Twins PECOTA Projections: The Hitters
Rod Carews Birthday replied to Matt Braun's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
Ouch. . . I just looked. The preseason Pecota prediction in 2019 was for 81 wins. If I recall, the end results were somewhat better. . .- 23 replies
-
- byron buxton
- jorge polanco
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Twins PECOTA Projections: The Hitters
Rod Carews Birthday replied to Matt Braun's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
There are a number of players on the Twins that are very difficult to predict (Kiriloff, Larnach, Gallo, et al) due to previous injury or wide variation in performance. At the 50th percentile, many of the Twins players don't look that great but neither do other teams' players. It is the team whose players exceed the projections that will be successful. The law of averages says that half of these guys will outperform their projections and half will underperform. The degree is what will matter. If the underperformers hit their 45th percentile and a couple of the overperformers hit their 95th percentile the overall numbers look pretty decent. If the opposite happens, look out. We're in trouble. I'm betting on a team win total in the upper 80's, but hey. . . I'm an optimist. I would love to know what the Pecota projections were in 2019.- 23 replies
-
- byron buxton
- jorge polanco
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
The AK injury seems very worrisome, although as a previous article pointed out, the procedure has been done successfully before. Between AK and Larnach, this would seem to be the year that they either take a very large step forward or get passed in the pecking order. For all of their potential, they have yet to show any solid sustained production at the major league level. As for the pitchers, it seems likely that at least one them won't work out (wish I could tell you which) because that's how pitchers go. My hope is that there is enough depth to anticipate that happening and to be in place to prevent the number five starter from being a dumpster fire.
- 25 replies
-
- byron buxton
- tyler mahle
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Is There More to Trevor Megill?
Rod Carews Birthday replied to Cody Pirkl's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
I think that Megill is the potential surprise candidate for a breakout - not a Duran type breakout, but more like a Tyler Duffy breakout from a few years ago. As indicated, the stuff is definitely there, and he seems to be willing to keep working on his pitches as well. It would be great if he were really solid in a lower leverage role in the bullpen. That would mean that everyone else is doing their job and things are going well. Where it gets a little scary is if he is forced into a higher leverage situation than he is comfortable being in. That probably means that some of the rest of the bullpen is either injured or ineffective. -
EXACTLY THIS. At some point, we need to trust the talent evaluators and hope/believe they have done a good job in putting this together. One or two injuries to the wrong people derails the entire plan, but again, it’s the same for every team. Plus, it really is possible to build the bullpen on the fly at least to a certain extent. As to the naysayers about “this mediocre starting pitching staff” or “this disastrous starting rotation”, WHEN exactly have you as a Twins fan EVER seen a better starting rotation for the season on a MN Twins team? I only go back to the mid-seventies so if you hit me with Camilo Pasquale, Mudcat Grant, Jim Perry, et al, perhaps you may have a point, but since then. . . I don’t think so.
- 37 replies
-
- jhoan duran
- emilio pagan
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
First of all, let me say as a long time Twins fan, this is a wonderful problem to have. In my time watching and listening to the team since the early 1970’s, I don’t remember a time when we had to (got to) pick between a solid MLB veteran pitcher seemingly recovered from injury and a young up and coming starting pitcher (that at this time last year was maybe our #2 pitcher) for the NUMBER FIVE spot in the rotation. Usually that would be the #3 spot, as we have seldom had more than two starting pitchers that we could regard as particularly solid. Even in 1987 and 1991 the fifth starter spot was pretty much a black hole. It drives me crazy when I hear people complain about these “below average” starters in their rotation, because over the last 40 years, wow can I show you below average starters! The late 1990’s was not for the faint of heart. I find myself in agreement with many of the previous posters in that I think Maeda gets the spot and Ober goes to St. Paul. Between his contract, his veteran status, and the need for predictable normalcy in his routine, Maeda is the obvious choice. I don’t think that Ober becomes a bullpen piece either because I believe the team views him as a long term starter and keeping him stretched out will be important for when (not if) someone is injured and they need another starter. If we get to August/September, everyone is healthy, the team is in a pennant race, and there is a specific need, MAYBE Maeda moves to the pen because he has shown the ability to do that. I don’t think it is likely, however, unless several stars line up for the Twins.
-
It’s a Make Or Break Year for Jorge Polanco
Rod Carews Birthday replied to Cody Pirkl's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
I do agree that this is a make or break year for Jorge Polanco. I also agree that may have much more to do with the kind of pressure put on by Royce Lewis, Austin Martin, Brooks Lee, Edouard Julien, et al. If some of those guys start to force their way to the majors, Polanco becomes a logical candidate for trade, whether at the deadline this summer or next offseason. His value should be pretty solid, with two years of control after this year, and at a reasonable price. If he can be adequately (or superbly!) replaced by one of those players it will be time for the Twins to move on and cash in on any value that he has at that point.- 31 replies
-
- jorge polanco
- austin martin
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Actually it kind of is. That 0-18 record against the Yankees was compiled over MANY years by many different groups of players on both the Twins and Yankees teams. It is an anomaly if any team wins 18 in a row over another in baseball and winning them over a period of years is even more so. Baseball just doesn't work like that. At this point that record is kind in people's heads -- perhaps even more for fans than for players. I'm not saying that the Twins team will be some sort of juggernaut this year and go blasting through the regular season at record pace, but I do think if reasonably healthy they are certainly improved over last year's team. Remember in baseball, the worst teams win about 40% of their games and the best ones win about 60% of their games.
- 56 replies
-
- luis arraez
- pablo lopez
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I think that moving Miranda back to his original position, 3B, is reasonable, especially when you combine the fact that he was nothing special defensively at 1B and has much more experience at third. A slimmer version of him will likely be a little quicker and more nimble and will likely improve his defense. I also think that opening up 1B for a guy who seems to be very solid defensively there in Kiriloff, makes a good deal of sense. IF (and it's a big if) he is recovered sufficiently from his wrist issues, he has excellent potential as a hitter. If not, we have several backups there -- it's not the top of the defensive food chain. As to Miranda, slimming down does not equate to removing strength or muscle. Miranda carrying a few less pounds of fat will likely make him a better hitter with just as much power -- if not more if he gains some strength through more muscle. It would be trainer malpractice to tell players "Don't worry about your body. You don't really need to report to camp in your best condition."
-
Forgotten Twins Greats: Dave Goltz
Rod Carews Birthday replied to Matt Braun's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
Thank you for this fine article about a forgotten but important player in Twins History. He was the Twins #1 post-Blyleven and pre-Viola. The 1977 season with the monster seasons from Carew, Bostock, and Hisle with the 20 victory season from Dave Goltz certainly was exciting even if it didn’t end in a division championship. -
Point taken and I think I agree. I think that one of the side-benefits of a trade would be freeing up a spot on the 40 man roster, although two spots come free when Spring Training starts with Canterino and Paddack going on the 60 day. There are indeed some good options still out there as free agents, but I think the Twins now value the players on the 40 man (whether they should or not — Pagan?) too much to just DFA someone. So. . . someone needs to go. . . If those FA relievers are still out there during Spring Training, I think the Twins will sign one of them.
-
I agree that this is an early point to be considering his HOF case, but this is when the really great players start to separate themselves from their peers. There are lots of players who are on a “HOF Trajectory” when they are 26 and have a couple of exciting years, but their candidacy starts to fade when they can’t sustain the production and/or Father Time or injury steps in to intervene. Sometimes when that happens, the thought that we considered them HOF material becomes laughable (HOF’ers Kerry Wood or Mark Prior anyone?). I think that Correa has a very strong foundation to his case at this point. If he continues to put up 5 WAR seasons for the next 5 or 6 years, his case becomes very strong. An added MVP and/or World Series title will add to the mix considerably. If he is in the top 35 before he hits 30 years old, he only moves up from here. Since his game isn’t built on speed, he may age better than people think and could put himself in position for election to the Hall. As an added bonus, if he has those kinds of seasons in the next 5 or 6 years, the Twins will benefit greatly. I don’t know if that will translate into WS appearances, but it is certainly something to hope for.
-
I think we are probably done trading until spring training starts. Their 40 man roster is full, as is everyone else’s. At that point, if everyone is mostly healthy and a few clubs get bit by early injuries, it could be a great time to trade one of the outfielders and one of the pitchers either for prospects or solid bullpen help. My vote is to trade Kepler and Sands (or Winder) for bullpen arms.
-
Twins Daily 2023 Top Prospects: #11-15
Rod Carews Birthday replied to Theodore Tollefson's topic in Twins Minor League Talk
I always like these prospect rundowns by people who are actually paying attention. Some of the national coverage can be a bit lacking. Recently they still had Luis Arraez playing second base all of last year for the Twins and I remember when they had Joe Mauer still catching two years after he had stopped. Those folks just don’t do their homework like you guys do. Of these prospects, I really like Waller and Festa the most. I think they both have potential to make some real impact with the big club - probably not much this year, but in 2024 and beyond. Yassir Mercedes is a player that I remembered them signing (vaguely) but didn’t really know much about. It’s good to get the update. He’s still miles away from the majors, but his potential is definitely strong to be an impact player a few years down the road. Thanks for not letting us forget about these prospects who don’t make the Top 100 lists. They often become very solid major league players.- 29 replies
-
- matt wallner
- yasser mercedes
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Health Has Changed Perception on Twins Youth
Rod Carews Birthday replied to Ted Schwerzler 's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
I really want Kiriloff to be back in full force but I’m skeptical about the wrist. I have much more faith in Larnach. He had an injury that he has healed from, but I fear Kiriloff has more of a “condition” that will result in a chronic ongoing situation. -
Who will lead Twins in WAR?
Rod Carews Birthday replied to Brad.dahlen's topic in Minnesota Twins Talk
Correa, Buxton, Lopez, Ryan, Larnach. I’m skeptical on Buxton’s AB’s and on Kiriloff’s wrist. I also fear a little sophomore slump for Jose Miranda. I think Ryan and Lopez are money in the bank and I think Correa goes off to an mvp caliber season. -
A Jose Miranda Breakout to Dream On
Rod Carews Birthday replied to Ted Schwerzler 's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
I agree with your thoughts on Julien. I think he has the potential to be really good. I just really want him to get some AAA time this season before he gets the promotion. Even with his Arizona fall league success, I think that some time in St. Paul will help his long term development a great deal.- 13 replies
-
- jose miranda
- gio urshela
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
A Jose Miranda Breakout to Dream On
Rod Carews Birthday replied to Ted Schwerzler 's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
If he could hit the Steamer projection, that would be a great year for him and hopefully be an even stronger foundation to continue to build upon. I feel like that makes his success more sustainable over several years than a big spike in year two with all of the added pressure and expectations that would immediately come with that. If the Twins can fill their team with “very good” players in many positions it will do as much for them as “great” players in one or two spots. Ask the Angels how that’s working out.- 13 replies
-
- jose miranda
- gio urshela
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Excellent summary of the offseason moves as well as putting them in context of the current team. It would be difficult to argue that the Twins ignored last year’s issues during this year’s off season. There is approximately 100% chance that some of the moves won’t work out, but that is to be expected. We just need to hope that the ones that don’t aren’t in a place to hurt the team too much. Go Twins!
- 39 replies
-
- michael a taylor
- pablo lopez
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
While I might agree that this article is a little optimistic (but not nearly as much as a lot of folks think), going into the season in 2019 there were VERY few people that would have predicted a 101 win team. Some may have had a division winner in their prediction, but it took career years (and fluky ones -- 38 year old players with 40 home runs) for 101 victories to happen. Barring the kind of injuries that the Twins had last year, the results should be substantially better. In fact, I would argue that even WITH the kinds of injuries that were had last year, the floor has been raised substantially on the hitting, the fielding, and the pitching bench. I think that a first place finish can and should be the hope. Remember neither Cleveland nor Chicago are great juggernauts.
- 50 replies
-
- carlos correa
- byron buxton
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Luis Arraez is one of my absolute favorite Twins ever. I hate the fact that he won't be playing for the Twins anymore. That being said, I think this is a fantastic trade. Aside from the generic "you can't ever have too much pitching", which is true of course, the Twins are a better hitting team than pitching -- and may still be so after this trade. Lopez is a pitcher in the same class as Gray and Mahle and whether he slots in as #1, #2, or #3 is irrelevant. He makes the team better and that's what any trade is really all about. We are trading two years of Arraez for two years of Lopez, which I think is a good trade -- pitching is usually harder to get than hitting. The final year of controllable Arraez is being traded for one excellent prospect (top 100ish) and one good looking prospect who is miles away from the majors, which is also reasonable. Untalked about here and elsewhere is that if Arraez had collected four less hits this season, Aaron Judge would have won the triple crown and Luis Arraez would have just been a "good hitter Luis Arraez" and not "American League Batting Champion Luis Arraez." Perception matters a lot and it probably contributes greatly to the value it brought back in this trade. I think there is a good chance that Arraez wins another batting title, but I still think this was a good trade.
-
Taking a flier on a guy like Adell could be OK and trading a pitcher like Sands doesn't really hurt much either, since I'm pretty sure he has been long passed up in the pecking order -- if he was ever really in it in the first place. If that's all it takes, I say go for it. It's definitely (washout) low floor and high ceiling for some future year. Signing Sano to a minor league deal is actually pretty similar, but Sano is a guy the Twins have already failed to "fix" so it doesn't seem like doing that is going to work. As has been mentioned earlier, skill sets and problems are similar, but maybe Adell just needs the right person saying it to him in the right way. I don't put much weight into him having Mike Trout whispering to him in previous years. Mike Trout is an amazing ballplayer. I wish he was on my team, but how many actual baseball problems do you think he has ever had to work through in his life? Not many, so figuring things out and expressing them is probably not his strength. He definitely has a "relatability" problem as an instructor, and so far, Adell has had a "teachability" problem.
-
If we don't see a substantial trade of an outfielder (likely Kepler) and an infielder (Arraez? Gordon? Kiriloff? Polanco??) it would seem that we will start the season with a bench of Catcher, Farmer, Gordon, and one of the Kiriloff/Larnach/Celestino group. Otherwise, all of the latter group of guys wind up starting the season in St. Paul, which is not a terrible outcome either. They could probably all use it for either some seasoning (Celestino), or to gain some confidence/rehab (Larnach/Kiriloff). I do really like Gordon as he fits in so many places. He may not be a great defender (but he's young, athletic, and still learning), but he is a decent hitter and versatility gives them a guy to use in many situations. It gets messier when Lewis or Martin force their way to the majors later this summer, but that will be a nice problem to have and to solve at the trade deadline.
-
Luis Arraez’s Value Goes Beyond Excellent On-Field Performance
Rod Carews Birthday commented on Adam Friedman's blog entry in Adam Friedman
I think that difficulty here is that Luis Arraez has come to be a fan favorite, including for me. That unfortunately means that we no longer look at him objectively when it comes to either how much the team depends on his particular skill set or how much he would/should be worth in a trade. The downside is that he doesn't really have a natural position in the field, has balky knees, and doesn't hit for power the way an ideal DH would. However, if we think that this year's batting championship is just the beginning of a long run of Tony Gwynn-like or Rod Carew-like hitting prowess then it really doesn't matter. The upside to trading him now is that he may be at his peak value and could actually be used as a major part of a package for an ace caliber starting pitcher. If he hits .260 next year, that value is minimal. As much as it hurts, I think we need to trade him for the right pitcher.

